"Lighting The Way For Those Not Here": How Technology Researchers Can Help Fight the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives (MMIR) Crisis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17966v1
• Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 19:49:59 GMT
• Title: "Lighting The Way For Those Not Here": How Technology Researchers Can Help Fight the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives (MMIR) Crisis
• Abstract summary: Technology plays a crucial role in the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives crisis.<n>Technology's role in shaping the MMIR crisis by centering community voices.<n>We analyze 140 webpages to identify systemic, technological, and institutional barriers that hinder communities' efforts.
• Score: 9.392684530847408
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Indigenous peoples across Turtle Island (North America) face disproportionate rates of disappearance and murder, a "genocide" rooted in settler-colonial violence and systemic erasure. Technology plays a crucial role in the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives (MMIR) crisis: perpetuating harm and impeding investigations, yet enabling advocacy and resistance. Communities utilize technologies such as AMBER alerts, news websites, social media groups, and campaigns (like #MMIW, #MMIWR, #NoMoreStolenSisters, and #NoMoreStolenDaughters) to mobilize searches, amplify awareness, and honor missing relatives. Yet, little research in HCI has critically examined technology's role in shaping the MMIR crisis by centering community voices. Through a large-scale study, we analyze 140 webpages to identify systemic, technological, and institutional barriers that hinder communities' efforts, while highlighting socio-technical actions that foster healing and safety. Finally, we amplify Indigenous voices by providing a dataset of stories that resist epistemic erasure, along with recommendations for HCI researchers to support Indigenous-led initiatives with cultural sensitivity, accountability, and self-determination.

Related papers

• Human-Centered Threat Modeling in Practice: Lessons, Challenges, and Paths Forward [8.374213820742199]
  We conduct 23 semi-structured interviews with researchers to examine the state of human-centered threat modeling (HCTM)<n>We find that HCTM is not a prescriptive process but a set of evolving practices shaped by relationships with participants, disciplinary backgrounds, and institutional structures.<n>We conclude by identifying opportunities to advance HCTM through shared infrastructure, broader recognition of diverse contributions, and stronger mechanisms for translating findings into policy, design, and societal change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T03:03:41Z)
• Seeing Isn't Believing: Addressing the Societal Impact of Deepfakes in Low-Tech Environments [5.183876599841578]
  Deepfakes pose significant risks to political stability, social trust, and economic well-being.<n>This work aims to understand how these technologies are perceived and impact resource-limited communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T18:18:24Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• A Unifying Bias-aware Multidisciplinary Framework for Investigating Socio-Technical Issues [6.307051347179095]
  This paper aims to bring together the disciplines of social science (SS) and computer science (CS)<n>Various analysis approaches from social science and machine learning (ML) were applied in a structured sequence to arrive at an original methodology of identifying and quantifying objects of inquiry.<n>A core feature of this framework is that it highlights where bias occurs and suggests possible steps to mitigate it.<n>To test our framework, we utilised it in the multidisciplinary investigation of the online harms encountered by minoritised ethnic (ME) communities when accessing and using digitalised social housing services in the UK.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T14:52:04Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• Misrepresented Technological Solutions in Imagined Futures: The Origins and Dangers of AI Hype in the Research Community [0.060998359915727114]
  We look at the origins and risks of AI hype to the research community and society more broadly. We propose a set of measures that researchers, regulators, and the public can take to mitigate these risks and reduce the prevalence of unfounded claims about the technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T20:47:17Z)
• Deepfake Media Forensics: State of the Art and Challenges Ahead [51.33414186878676]
  AI-generated synthetic media, also called Deepfakes, have influenced so many domains, from entertainment to cybersecurity. Deepfake detection has become a vital area of research, focusing on identifying subtle inconsistencies and artifacts with machine learning techniques. This paper reviews the primary algorithms that address these challenges, examining their advantages, limitations, and future prospects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T08:57:47Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• The Rise of Technology in Crime Prevention: Opportunities, Challenges and Practitioners Perspectives [2.283665431721732]
  It is a moral obligation for the research community to consider how the contemporary technological developments might help reduce crime worldwide. This paper provides a discussion of how a sample of contemporary hardware and software-based technologies might help further reduce criminal actions. After a thorough analysis of a wide array of technologies, we believe that the adoption of novel technologies by vulnerable individuals, victim support organisations and law enforcement can help reduce the occurrence of criminal activity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T16:02:40Z)
• Clustering of Social Media Messages for Humanitarian Aid Response during Crisis [47.187609203210705]
  We show that recent advances in Deep Learning and Natural Language Processing outperform prior approaches for the task of classifying informativeness. We extend these methods to two sub-tasks of informativeness and find that the Deep Learning methods are effective here as well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T02:18:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.