Thought-Transfer: Indirect Targeted Poisoning Attacks on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19061v2
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 15:16:22 GMT
- Title: Thought-Transfer: Indirect Targeted Poisoning Attacks on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Models
- Authors: Harsh Chaudhari, Ethan Rathbun, Hanna Foerster, Jamie Hayes, Matthew Jagielski, Milad Nasr, Ilia Shumailov, Alina Oprea,
- Abstract summary: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as a powerful technique for enhancing large language models' capabilities.<n>Our work unveils a new class of Indirect Targeted Poisoning attacks in reasoning models.
- Score: 46.18909391478578
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as a powerful technique for enhancing large language models' capabilities by generating intermediate reasoning steps for complex tasks. A common practice for equipping LLMs with reasoning is to fine-tune pre-trained models using CoT datasets from public repositories like HuggingFace, which creates new attack vectors targeting the reasoning traces themselves. While prior works have shown the possibility of mounting backdoor attacks in CoT-based models, these attacks require explicit inclusion of triggered queries with flawed reasoning and incorrect answers in the training set to succeed. Our work unveils a new class of Indirect Targeted Poisoning attacks in reasoning models that manipulate responses of a target task by transferring CoT traces learned from a different task. Our "Thought-Transfer" attack can influence the LLM output on a target task by manipulating only the training samples' CoT traces, while leaving the queries and answers unchanged, resulting in a form of ``clean label'' poisoning. Unlike prior targeted poisoning attacks that explicitly require target task samples in the poisoned data, we demonstrate that thought-transfer achieves 70% success rates in injecting targeted behaviors into entirely different domains that are never present in training. Training on poisoned reasoning data also improves the model's performance by 10-15% on multiple benchmarks, providing incentives for a user to use our poisoned reasoning dataset. Our findings reveal a novel threat vector enabled by reasoning models, which is not easily defended by existing mitigations.
Related papers
- BadThink: Triggered Overthinking Attacks on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [24.513640096951566]
We propose BadThink, the first backdoor attack designed to deliberately induce "overthinking" behavior in large language models.<n>When activated by carefully crafted trigger prompts, BadThink manipulates the model to generate inflated reasoning traces.<n>We implement this attack through a sophisticated poisoning-based fine-tuning strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T13:44:51Z) - Variance-Based Defense Against Blended Backdoor Attacks [0.0]
Backdoor attacks represent a subtle yet effective class of cyberattacks targeting AI models.<n>We propose a novel defense method that trains a model on the given dataset, detects poisoned classes, and extracts the critical part of the attack trigger.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T09:01:35Z) - Revisiting Backdoor Attacks on LLMs: A Stealthy and Practical Poisoning Framework via Harmless Inputs [54.90315421117162]
We propose a novel poisoning method via completely harmless data.<n>Inspired by the causal reasoning in auto-regressive LLMs, we aim to establish robust associations between triggers and an affirmative response prefix.<n>We observe an interesting resistance phenomenon where the LLM initially appears to agree but subsequently refuses to answer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T08:13:59Z) - Wicked Oddities: Selectively Poisoning for Effective Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks [11.390175856652856]
Clean-label attacks are a more stealthy form of backdoor attacks that can perform the attack without changing the labels of poisoned data.
We study different strategies for selectively poisoning a small set of training samples in the target class to boost the attack success rate.
Our threat model poses a serious threat in training machine learning models with third-party datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T15:38:21Z) - Pre-trained Trojan Attacks for Visual Recognition [106.13792185398863]
Pre-trained vision models (PVMs) have become a dominant component due to their exceptional performance when fine-tuned for downstream tasks.
We propose the Pre-trained Trojan attack, which embeds backdoors into a PVM, enabling attacks across various downstream vision tasks.
We highlight the challenges posed by cross-task activation and shortcut connections in successful backdoor attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-23T05:51:40Z) - FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning
Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks.
FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain.
We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z) - Poisoning Network Flow Classifiers [10.055241826257083]
This paper focuses on poisoning attacks, specifically backdoor attacks, against network traffic flow classifiers.
We investigate the challenging scenario of clean-label poisoning where the adversary's capabilities are constrained to tampering only with the training data.
We describe a trigger crafting strategy that leverages model interpretability techniques to generate trigger patterns that are effective even at very low poisoning rates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T16:24:15Z) - Hidden Backdoor Attack against Semantic Segmentation Models [60.0327238844584]
The emphbackdoor attack intends to embed hidden backdoors in deep neural networks (DNNs) by poisoning training data.
We propose a novel attack paradigm, the emphfine-grained attack, where we treat the target label from the object-level instead of the image-level.
Experiments show that the proposed methods can successfully attack semantic segmentation models by poisoning only a small proportion of training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-06T05:50:29Z) - How Robust are Randomized Smoothing based Defenses to Data Poisoning? [66.80663779176979]
We present a previously unrecognized threat to robust machine learning models that highlights the importance of training-data quality.
We propose a novel bilevel optimization-based data poisoning attack that degrades the robustness guarantees of certifiably robust classifiers.
Our attack is effective even when the victim trains the models from scratch using state-of-the-art robust training methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-02T15:30:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.