Whitespaces Don't Lie: Feature-Driven and Embedding-Based Approaches for Detecting Machine-Generated Code

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19264v1
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 06:43:51 GMT
• Title: Whitespaces Don't Lie: Feature-Driven and Embedding-Based Approaches for Detecting Machine-Generated Code
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have made it remarkably easy to synthesize plausible source code from natural language prompts.<n>This paper investigates the problem of distinguishing human-written from machine-generated code by comparing two complementary approaches.
• Score: 0.2624902795082451
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have made it remarkably easy to synthesize plausible source code from natural language prompts. While this accelerates software development and supports learning, it also raises new risks for academic integrity, authorship attribution, and responsible AI use. This paper investigates the problem of distinguishing human-written from machine-generated code by comparing two complementary approaches: feature-based detectors built from lightweight, interpretable stylometric and structural properties of code, and embedding-based detectors leveraging pretrained code encoders. Using a recent large-scale benchmark dataset of 600k human-written and AI-generated code samples, we find that feature-based models achieve strong performance (ROC-AUC 0.995, PR-AUC 0.995, F1 0.971), while embedding-based models with CodeBERT embeddings are also very competitive (ROC-AUC 0.994, PR-AUC 0.994, F1 0.965). Analysis shows that features tied to indentation and whitespace provide particularly discriminative cues, whereas embeddings capture deeper semantic patterns and yield slightly higher precision. These findings underscore the trade-offs between interpretability and generalization, offering practical guidance for deploying robust code-origin detection in academic and industrial contexts.

Related papers

• Base Models Look Human To AI Detectors [68.7723287560362]
  We show that generated text from base models is often judged overwhelmingly human, whereas text generated by their instruction-tuned counterparts is not.<n>We propose Humanization by Iterative Paraphrasing (HIP), a detector-agnostic pipeline that minimally fine-tunes a base model into a paraphraser and applies it iteratively.<n>Our findings suggest that current detectors are tracking artifacts of instruction tuning and local context more than any in notion of machine-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T08:13:12Z)
• LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning [0.31034395048547575]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in software development has made distinguishing AI-generated code from human-written code a critical challenge.<n>We present a detection framework that fine-tune GraphCodeBERT using a two-stage supervised contrastive learning pipeline.<n>We evaluate on two benchmark datasets - GPTSniffer and Whodunit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:32:25Z)
• Error Understanding in Program Code With LLM-DL for Multi-label Classification [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation tasks.<n>This study proposes a multi-label error classification framework for source code that leverages fine-tuned LLMs.<n>This work lays the foundation for developing intelligent, scalable tools for automated code feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T04:05:42Z)
• CLAIRE: Compressed Latent Autoencoder for Industrial Representation and Evaluation -- A Deep Learning Framework for Smart Manufacturing [51.56484100374058]
  CLAIRE is a hybrid end-to-end learning framework that integrates unsupervised deep representation learning with supervised classification for intelligent quality control in smart manufacturing systems.<n>It employs an optimized deep autoencoder to transform raw input into a compact latent space, effectively capturing the intrinsic data structure while suppressing irrelevant or noisy features.<n>The proposed framework highlights the potential of integrating explainable AI with feature-aware regularization for robust fault detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T15:11:58Z)
• AI Generated Text Detection [0.0]
  This paper presents an evaluation of AI text detection methods, including both traditional machine learning models and transformer-based architectures.<n>We utilize two datasets, HC3 and DAIGT v2, to build a unified benchmark and apply a topic-based data split to prevent information leakage.<n>Results indicate that contextual modeling is significantly superior to lexical features and highlight the importance of mitigating topic memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T11:18:10Z)
• Every Step Counts: Decoding Trajectories as Authorship Fingerprints of dLLMs [63.82840470917859]
  We show that the decoding mechanism of dLLMs can be used as a powerful tool for model attribution.<n>We propose a novel information extraction scheme called the Directed Decoding Map (DDM), which captures structural relationships between decoding steps and better reveals model-specific behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T06:25:10Z)
• Large Language Models Versus Static Code Analysis Tools: A Systematic Benchmark for Vulnerability Detection [0.0]
  Three industry-standard rule-based static code-analysis tools (Sonar, CodeQL and Snyk Code) and three state-of-the-art large language models hosted on the GitHub Models platform (GPT-4.1, Mistral Large and DeepSeek V3) were evaluated.<n>Using a curated suite of ten real-world C# projects that embed 63 vulnerabilities, we measure classical accuracy (precision, recall, F-score), analysis latency, granularity and the developer effort required to vet true positives.<n>We recommend a hybrid pipeline: employ language models early in development for broad, context-aware detection and
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T13:48:38Z)
• Is Compression Really Linear with Code Intelligence? [60.123628177110206]
  textitFormat Annealing is a lightweight, transparent training methodology designed to assess the intrinsic capabilities of pre-trained models equitably.<n>Our empirical results reveal a fundamental logarithmic relationship between measured code intelligence and bits-per-character (BPC)<n>Our work provides a more nuanced understanding of compression's role in developing code intelligence and contributes a robust evaluation framework in the code domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T16:59:14Z)
• An Empirical Study on Automatically Detecting AI-Generated Source Code: How Far Are We? [8.0988059417354]
  We propose a range of approaches to improve the performance of AI-generated code detection. Our best model outperforms state-of-the-art AI-generated code detector (GPTSniffer) and achieves an F1 score of 82.55.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T22:48:18Z)
• Applying Ensemble Methods to Model-Agnostic Machine-Generated Text Detection [0.0]
  We study the problem of detecting machine-generated text when the large language model it is possibly derived from is unknown. We use a zero-shot model for machine-generated text detection which is highly accurate when the generative (or base) language model is the same as the discriminative (or scoring) language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T12:58:01Z)
• Uncovering LLM-Generated Code: A Zero-Shot Synthetic Code Detector via Code Rewriting [78.48355455324688]
  We propose a novel zero-shot synthetic code detector based on the similarity between the original code and its LLM-rewritten variants.<n>Our results demonstrate a significant improvement over existing SOTA synthetic content detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T08:57:28Z)
• Between Lines of Code: Unraveling the Distinct Patterns of Machine and Human Programmers [14.018844722021896]
  We study the specific patterns that characterize machine- and human-authored code. We propose DetectCodeGPT, a novel method for detecting machine-generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T09:15:20Z)
• Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Codes [83.0342513054389]
  This work proposes a training-free approach for the detection of LLMs-generated codes. We find that existing training-based or zero-shot text detectors are ineffective in detecting code. Our method exhibits robustness against revision attacks and generalizes well to Java codes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T10:08:21Z)
• Software Vulnerability Detection via Deep Learning over Disaggregated Code Graph Representation [57.92972327649165]
  This work explores a deep learning approach to automatically learn the insecure patterns from code corpora. Because code naturally admits graph structures with parsing, we develop a novel graph neural network (GNN) to exploit both the semantic context and structural regularity of a program.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T21:24:36Z)
• CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis [57.87741831987889]
  In the area of code synthesis, the commonly used evaluation metric is BLEU or perfect accuracy. We introduce a new automatic evaluation metric, dubbed CodeBLEU. It absorbs the strength of BLEU in the n-gram match and further injects code syntax via abstract syntax trees (AST) and code semantics via data-flow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T03:10:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.