FIT: Defying Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual LLM Unlearning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21682v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 13:15:32 GMT
• Title: FIT: Defying Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual LLM Unlearning
• Authors: Xiaoyu Xu, Minxin Du, Kun Fang, Zi Liang, Yaxin Xiao, Zhicong Huang, Cheng Hong, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu,
• Abstract summary: fit is a framework for continual unlearning that handles large numbers of deletion requests.<n>fit mitigates degradation through rigorous data underlineFiltering, underlineImportance-aware updates, and underlineTargeted layer attribution.<n>fit surpasses existing methods on MMLU, CommonsenseQA, and GSM8K, and remains resistant against both relearning and quantization recovery attacks.
• Score: 23.471857001200465
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities across diverse tasks but raise concerns about privacy, copyright, and harmful materials. Existing LLM unlearning methods rarely consider the continual and high-volume nature of real-world deletion requests, which can cause utility degradation and catastrophic forgetting as requests accumulate. To address this challenge, we introduce \fit, a framework for continual unlearning that handles large numbers of deletion requests while maintaining robustness against both catastrophic forgetting and post-unlearning recovery. \fit mitigates degradation through rigorous data \underline{F}iltering, \underline{I}mportance-aware updates, and \underline{T}argeted layer attribution, enabling stable performance across long sequences of unlearning operations and achieving a favorable balance between forgetting effectiveness and utility retention. To support realistic evaluation, we present \textbf{PCH}, a benchmark covering \textbf{P}ersonal information, \textbf{C}opyright, and \textbf{H}armful content in sequential deletion scenarios, along with two symmetric metrics, Forget Degree (F.D.) and Retain Utility (R.U.), which jointly assess forgetting quality and utility preservation. Extensive experiments on four open-source LLMs with hundreds of deletion requests show that \fit achieves the strongest trade-off between F.D. and R.U., surpasses existing methods on MMLU, CommonsenseQA, and GSM8K, and remains resistant against both relearning and quantization recovery attacks.

Related papers

• AceGRPO: Adaptive Curriculum Enhanced Group Relative Policy Optimization for Autonomous Machine Learning Engineering [52.67783579040657]
  AceGRPO is a machine learning system that prioritizes tasks at the agent's learning frontier to maximize learning efficiency.<n>Our trained Ace-30B model achieves a 100% valid submission rate on MLE-Bench-Lite, approaches the performance of proprietary frontier models, and outperforms larger open-source baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T10:55:03Z)
• Distill, Forget, Repeat: A Framework for Continual Unlearning in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [42.10036183563499]
  We introduce a novel generative distillation based continual unlearning framework that ensures targeted and stable unlearning under sequences of deletion requests.<n>Experiments on a 10-step sequential benchmark demonstrate that our method unlearns forget concepts with better fidelity.<n>This framework provides a viable pathway for the responsible deployment and maintenance of large-scale generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T11:22:32Z)
• Retrofit: Continual Learning with Bounded Forgetting for Security Applications [25.185616916987158]
  We propose RETROFIT, a data retrospective-free continual learning method that achieves bounded forgetting for effective knowledge transfer.<n>To mitigate interference, we apply low-rank and sparse updates that confine parameter changes to independent subspaces.<n>In malware detection under temporal drift, it substantially improves the retention score, from 20.2% to 38.6% over CL baselines, and exceeds the oracle upper bound on new data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T16:07:03Z)
• MaP: A Unified Framework for Reliable Evaluation of Pre-training Dynamics [72.00014675808228]
  Instability in Large Language Models evaluation process obscures true learning dynamics.<n>We introduce textbfMaP, a framework that integrates underlineMerging underlineand the underlinePass@k metric.<n>Experiments show that MaP yields significantly smoother performance curves, reduces inter-run variance, and ensures more consistent rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T11:40:27Z)
• OFMU: Optimization-Driven Framework for Machine Unlearning [5.100622189286672]
  Large language models increasingly require the ability to unlearn specific knowledge, such as user requests, copyrighted materials, or outdated information.<n>We propose OFMU, a penalty-based bi-level optimization framework that explicitly prioritizes forgetting while preserving retention.<n>We show that OFMU consistently outperforms existing unlearning methods in both efficacy and retained utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T15:31:32Z)
• Towards Mitigating Excessive Forgetting in LLM Unlearning via Entanglement-Aware Unlearning with Proxy Constraint [28.25159814956888]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on massive datasets that may include private or copyrighted content.<n>Due to growing privacy and ownership concerns, data owners may request the removal of their data from trained models.<n>Most existing methods lack a sound forgetting boundary, causing some samples to be under-forgotten.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T05:45:40Z)
• Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting [70.83781268763215]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across diverse multimodal tasks by leveraging large-scale pre-training.<n>VLMs face unique challenges such as cross-modal feature drift, parameter interference due to shared architectures, and zero-shot capability erosion.<n>This survey aims to serve as a comprehensive and diagnostic reference for researchers developing lifelong vision-language systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T09:03:10Z)
• Constrained Entropic Unlearning: A Primal-Dual Framework for Large Language Models [14.321060805197874]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed in real-world settings increasingly face the need to unlearn sensitive, outdated, or proprietary information.<n>Existing unlearning methods formulate forgetting and retention as a regularized trade-off, combining both objectives into a single scalarized loss.<n>We propose a new formulation of LLM unlearning as a constrained optimization problem: forgetting is enforced via a novel logit-margin flattening loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T17:55:23Z)
• UniErase: Towards Balanced and Precise Unlearning in Language Models [69.04923022755547]
  Large language models (LLMs) require iterative updates to address the outdated information problem.<n>UniErase is a novel unlearning framework that demonstrates precision and balanced performances between knowledge unlearning and ability retaining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T15:53:28Z)
• RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content [62.685566387625975]
  Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks. This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently moderate harmful and unsafe inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T07:25:02Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Models [52.734140807634624]
  Aligned large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in task-solving, following instructions, and ensuring safety. Existing continual learning benchmarks lack sufficient challenge for leading aligned LLMs. We introduce TRACE, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate continual learning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T16:38:49Z)
• RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
  We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target. RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead. Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.