BioAgent Bench: An AI Agent Evaluation Suite for Bioinformatics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21800v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:44:03 GMT
• Title: BioAgent Bench: An AI Agent Evaluation Suite for Bioinformatics
• Abstract summary: BioAgent Bench is a benchmark dataset and an evaluation suite designed for measuring the performance and robustness of AI agents.<n>The benchmark contains curated end-to-end tasks with prompts that specify concrete output artifacts to support automated assessment.<n>We evaluate frontier closed-source and open-weight models across multiple agent harnesses.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces BioAgent Bench, a benchmark dataset and an evaluation suite designed for measuring the performance and robustness of AI agents in common bioinformatics tasks. The benchmark contains curated end-to-end tasks (e.g., RNA-seq, variant calling, metagenomics) with prompts that specify concrete output artifacts to support automated assessment, including stress testing under controlled perturbations. We evaluate frontier closed-source and open-weight models across multiple agent harnesses, and use an LLM-based grader to score pipeline progress and outcome validity. We find that frontier agents can complete multi-step bioinformatics pipelines without elaborate custom scaffolding, often producing the requested final artifacts reliably. However, robustness tests reveal failure modes under controlled perturbations (corrupted inputs, decoy files, and prompt bloat), indicating that correct high-level pipeline construction does not guarantee reliable step-level reasoning. Finally, because bioinformatics workflows may involve sensitive patient data, proprietary references, or unpublished IP, closed-source models can be unsuitable under strict privacy constraints; in such settings, open-weight models may be preferable despite lower completion rates. We release the dataset and evaluation suite publicly.

Related papers

• Bioinfoysis Technical Report [22.71562563762352]
  We introduce textbfBioinfoysis, a multi-agent harness that represents each request as a persistent artifact-grounded analysis run.<n>A controlled runtime validates generated scripts, tables, and figures before they are used in downstream analysis or reporting.<n>Across four underlying language models, Bioinfoysis increases average accuracy from 27.81% to 64.13% on SeqQA2 and from 3.13% to 31.25% on DbQA2.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-03T13:59:00Z)
• ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step [74.83535434786145]
  We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T15:07:46Z)
• Automated Hardware Validation Test Plan Generation for Large Scale AI Datacenter Platforms Using a Generative AI Multi-Agents Architecture [4.668322408437681]
  This paper presents a generative AI multi-agent architecture that automates the generation of structured hardware validation test plans.<n> evaluated on two production platforms against manual baselines, the framework achieves coverage expansions of 74.2% and 51.4%, cutting authoring from days to hours.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T17:41:33Z)
• The Meta-Agent Challenge: Are Current Agents Capable of Autonomous Agent Development? [80.24951682268332]
  We introduce the Meta-Agent Challenge (MAC), an evaluation framework designed to test the capacity of frontier models for autonomous agent development.<n>To ensure evaluation integrity, this framework is secured by multi-layer defenses against reward hacking.<n>We demonstrate that meta-agents rarely match human-engineered baseline policies, and the few that do are dominated by proprietary frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T04:58:17Z)
• Towards a Virtual Neuroscientist: Autonomous Neuroimaging Analysis via Multi-Agent Collaboration [53.772014300855375]
  We introduce NIAgent, a multi-agent system for autonomous end-to-end neuroimaging analysis.<n>Unlike conventional flat tool-calling agents, NIAgent adopts a code-centric execution paradigm.<n>We propose a hierarchical verification framework for autonomous quality control, integrating cohort-level metric screening with agentic visual inspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T06:30:19Z)
• LiveFMBench: Unveiling the Power and Limits of Agentic Workflows in Specification Generation [75.05397479715576]
  Large language models (LLMs) and agents have shown promising progress, but their true capabilities and failure modes remain unclear.<n>We present the first systematic and contamination-aware study of LLM- and agent-based formal specification generation for C programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T11:31:33Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• Mozi: Governed Autonomy for Drug Discovery LLM Agents [21.429647382651677]
  In dependency-heavy pharmaceutical pipelines, autonomous agents often drift into irreproducible trajectories.<n>We present Mozi, a dual-layer architecture that bridges the flexibility of generative AI with the deterministic rigor of computational biology.<n>We demonstrate Mozi's ability to navigate massive chemical spaces, enforce stringent toxicity filters, and generate highly competitive in silico candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T02:22:21Z)
• Agentic AI for Self-Driving Laboratories in Soft Matter: Taxonomy, Benchmarks,and Open Challenges [8.153488410654004]
  Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) close the loop between experiment design, automated execution, and data-driven decision making.<n>This survey uses soft matter as a representative setting but focuses on the AI questions that arise in real laboratories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T17:44:19Z)
• Inference-Time Scaling of Verification: Self-Evolving Deep Research Agents via Test-Time Rubric-Guided Verification [71.98473277917962]
  Recent advances in Deep Research Agents (DRAs) are transforming automated knowledge discovery and problem-solving.<n>We propose an alternative paradigm: self-evolving the agent's ability by iteratively verifying the policy model's outputs, guided by meticulously crafted rubrics.<n>We present DeepVerifier, a rubrics-based outcome reward verifier that leverages the asymmetry of verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T09:47:31Z)
• Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces [126.23612941699565]
  Terminal-Bench 2.0 is a benchmark composed of 89 tasks in computer terminal environments inspired by problems from real world.<n>We show that frontier models and agents score less than 65% on the benchmark.<n>We publish the dataset and evaluation harness to assist developers and researchers in future work at https://www.tbench.ai/.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T01:29:30Z)
• BiomechAgent: AI-Assisted Biomechanical Analysis Through Code-Generating Agents [1.1458853556386797]
  We present BiomechAgent, a code-generating AI agent that enables biomechanical analysis through natural language.<n>We developed a benchmark spanning data retrieval, visualization, activity classification, temporal segmentation, and clinical reasoning.<n>Biomechanically-informed, domain-specific instructions significantly improved performance over generic prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T04:30:04Z)
• Impatient Users Confuse AI Agents: High-fidelity Simulations of Human Traits for Testing Agents [58.00130492861884]
  TraitBasis is a lightweight, model-agnostic method for systematically stress testing AI agents.<n>TraitBasis learns directions in activation space corresponding to steerable user traits.<n>We observe on average a 2%-30% performance degradation on $tau$-Trait across frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T05:03:57Z)
• Automatic Building Code Review: A Case Study [6.530899637501737]
  Building officials face labor-intensive, error-prone, and costly manual reviews of design documents as projects increase in size and complexity.<n>This study introduces a novel agent-driven framework that integrates BIM-based data extraction with automated verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T00:30:14Z)
• ConformalSAM: Unlocking the Potential of Foundational Segmentation Models in Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Conformal Prediction [57.930531826380836]
  This work explores whether a foundational segmentation model can address label scarcity in the pixel-level vision task as an annotator for unlabeled images.<n>We propose ConformalSAM, a novel SSSS framework which first calibrates the foundation model using the target domain's labeled data and then filters out unreliable pixel labels of unlabeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:02:57Z)
• Stress-Testing ML Pipelines with Adversarial Data Corruption [11.91482648083998]
  Regulators now demand evidence that high-stakes systems can withstand realistic, interdependent errors.<n>We introduce SAVAGE, a framework that formally models data-quality issues through dependency graphs and flexible corruption templates.<n>Savanage employs a bi-level optimization approach to efficiently identify vulnerable data subpopulations and fine-tune corruption severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T00:41:24Z)
• InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [63.55258191625131]
  InfoDeepSeek is a new benchmark for assessing agentic information seeking in real-world, dynamic web environments.<n>We propose a systematic methodology for constructing challenging queries satisfying the criteria of determinacy, difficulty, and diversity.<n>We develop the first evaluation framework tailored to dynamic agentic information seeking, including fine-grained metrics about the accuracy, utility, and compactness of information seeking outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T14:44:40Z)
• LLM Agent Swarm for Hypothesis-Driven Drug Discovery [2.7036595757881323]
  PharmaSwarm is a unified multi-agent framework that orchestrates specialized "agents" to propose, validate, and refine hypotheses for novel drug targets and lead compounds.<n>By acting as an AI copilot, PharmaSwarm can accelerate translational research and deliver high-confidence hypotheses more efficiently than traditional pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T22:27:50Z)
• Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIs [71.7892165868749]
  Commercial Large Language Model (LLM) APIs create a fundamental trust problem.<n>Users pay for specific models but have no guarantee that providers deliver them faithfully.<n>We formalize this model substitution problem and evaluate detection methods under realistic adversarial conditions.<n>We propose and evaluate the use of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) as one practical and robust solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:57:41Z)
• MIBP-Cert: Certified Training against Data Perturbations with Mixed-Integer Bilinear Programs [50.41998220099097]
  Data errors, corruptions, and poisoning attacks during training pose a major threat to the reliability of modern AI systems.<n>We introduce MIBP-Cert, a novel certification method based on mixed-integer bilinear programming (MIBP)<n>By computing the set of parameters reachable through perturbed or manipulated data, we can predict all possible outcomes and guarantee robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T14:56:39Z)
• Benchmarking Uncertainty Qualification on Biosignal Classification Tasks under Dataset Shift [16.15816241847314]
  We propose a framework to evaluate the capability of the estimated uncertainty in capturing different types of biosignal dataset shifts. In particular, we use three classification tasks based on respiratory sounds and electrocardiography signals to benchmark five representative uncertainty qualification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T20:42:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.