Rethinking LLM-as-a-Judge: Representation-as-a-Judge with Small Language Models via Semantic Capacity Asymmetry
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22588v1
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 05:34:24 GMT
- Title: Rethinking LLM-as-a-Judge: Representation-as-a-Judge with Small Language Models via Semantic Capacity Asymmetry
- Authors: Zhuochun Li, Yong Zhang, Ming Li, Yuelyu Ji, Yiming Zeng, Ning Cheng, Yun Zhu, Yanmeng Wang, Shaojun Wang, Jing Xiao, Daqing He,
- Abstract summary: We investigate whether smaller models can serve as efficient evaluators by leveraging internal representations instead of surface generation.<n>We propose the Semantic Capacity Asymmetry Hypothesis: evaluation requires significantly less semantic capacity than generation.<n>We instantiate this paradigm through INSPECTOR, a probing-based framework that predicts aspect-level evaluation scores from small model representations.
- Score: 41.26991813225211
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as reference-free evaluators via prompting, but this "LLM-as-a-Judge" paradigm is costly, opaque, and sensitive to prompt design. In this work, we investigate whether smaller models can serve as efficient evaluators by leveraging internal representations instead of surface generation. We uncover a consistent empirical pattern: small LMs, despite with weak generative ability, encode rich evaluative signals in their hidden states. This motivates us to propose the Semantic Capacity Asymmetry Hypothesis: evaluation requires significantly less semantic capacity than generation and can be grounded in intermediate representations, suggesting that evaluation does not necessarily need to rely on large-scale generative models but can instead leverage latent features from smaller ones. Our findings motivate a paradigm shift from LLM-as-a-Judge to Representation-as-a-Judge, a decoding-free evaluation strategy that probes internal model structure rather than relying on prompted output. We instantiate this paradigm through INSPECTOR, a probing-based framework that predicts aspect-level evaluation scores from small model representations. Experiments on reasoning benchmarks (GSM8K, MATH, GPQA) show that INSPECTOR substantially outperforms prompting-based small LMs and closely approximates full LLM judges, while offering a more efficient, reliable, and interpretable alternative for scalable evaluation.
Related papers
- Small Reward Models via Backward Inference [100.59075794599768]
FLIP (FLipped Inference for Prompt Reconstruction) is a reference-free and rubric-free reward modeling approach.<n>It reformulates reward modeling through backward inference: inferring the instruction that would most plausibly produce a given response.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-14T01:55:39Z) - JudgeBoard: Benchmarking and Enhancing Small Language Models for Reasoning Evaluation [13.831735556002426]
Small language models (SLMs) have shown promise on various reasoning tasks.<n>Their ability to judge the correctness of answers remains unclear compared to large language models (LLMs)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-20T01:14:39Z) - InverseScope: Scalable Activation Inversion for Interpreting Large Language Models [5.670123459649656]
InverseScope is an assumption-light and scalable framework for interpreting neural activations via input inversion.<n>To address the inefficiency of sampling in high-dimensional spaces, we propose a novel conditional generation architecture.<n>We also introduce a quantitative evaluation protocol that tests interpretability hypotheses using the feature consistency rate computed over the sampled inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T03:59:28Z) - Meta-Evaluating Local LLMs: Rethinking Performance Metrics for Serious Games [3.725822359130832]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being explored as evaluators in serious games.<n>This study investigates the reliability of five small-scale LLMs when assessing player responses in textitEn-join, a game that simulates decision-making within energy communities.<n>Our results highlight the strengths and limitations of each model, revealing trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-13T10:46:13Z) - Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z) - Beyond the Singular: The Essential Role of Multiple Generations in Effective Benchmark Evaluation and Analysis [10.133537818749291]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant utilities in real-world applications.<n> Benchmark evaluations are crucial for assessing the capabilities of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T03:43:33Z) - Predicting the Performance of Black-box LLMs through Self-Queries [60.87193950962585]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly relied on in AI systems, predicting when they make mistakes is crucial.<n>In this paper, we extract features of LLMs in a black-box manner by using follow-up prompts and taking the probabilities of different responses as representations.<n>We demonstrate that training a linear model on these low-dimensional representations produces reliable predictors of model performance at the instance level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-02T22:26:54Z) - Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode.
We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z) - CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models [109.60793869938534]
We introduce a novel task, Counterfactual Logical Modification (CLOMO), and a high-quality human-annotated benchmark.
In this task, LLMs must adeptly alter a given argumentative text to uphold a predetermined logical relationship.
We propose an innovative evaluation metric, the Self-Evaluation Score (SES), to directly evaluate the natural language output of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T08:29:54Z) - Evaluating Representations with Readout Model Switching [19.907607374144167]
In this paper, we propose to use the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle to devise an evaluation metric.
We design a hybrid discrete and continuous-valued model space for the readout models and employ a switching strategy to combine their predictions.
The proposed metric can be efficiently computed with an online method and we present results for pre-trained vision encoders of various architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T14:08:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.