TimeMachine-bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Model Capabilities in Repository-Level Migration Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22597v1
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 05:42:45 GMT
• Title: TimeMachine-bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Model Capabilities in Repository-Level Migration Tasks
• Authors: Ryo Fujii, Makoto Morishita, Kazuki Yano, Jun Suzuki,
• Abstract summary: TimeMachine-bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate software migration in real-world Python projects.<n>Our benchmark consists of GitHub repositories whose tests begin to fail in response to dependency updates.
• Score: 12.573674060643787
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the advancement of automated software engineering, research focus is increasingly shifting toward practical tasks reflecting the day-to-day work of software engineers. Among these tasks, software migration, a critical process of adapting code to evolving environments, has been largely overlooked. In this study, we introduce TimeMachine-bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate software migration in real-world Python projects. Our benchmark consists of GitHub repositories whose tests begin to fail in response to dependency updates. The construction process is fully automated, enabling live updates of the benchmark. Furthermore, we curated a human-verified subset to ensure problem solvability. We evaluated agent-based baselines built on top of 11 models, including both strong open-weight and state-of-the-art LLMs on this verified subset. Our results indicated that, while LLMs show some promise for migration tasks, they continue to face substantial reliability challenges, including spurious solutions that exploit low test coverage and unnecessary edits stemming from suboptimal tool-use strategies. Our dataset and implementation are available at https://github.com/tohoku-nlp/timemachine-bench.

Related papers

• MEnvAgent: Scalable Polyglot Environment Construction for Verifiable Software Engineering [54.236614097082395]
  We introduce MEnvAgent, a framework for automated Environment construction.<n>MEnvAgent employs a multi-agent Planning-Execution-Verification architecture to autonomously resolve construction failures.<n>MEnvData-SWE is the largest open-source polyglot dataset of realistic verifiable Docker environments to date.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T11:36:10Z)
• SWE-fficiency: Can Language Models Optimize Real-World Repositories on Real Workloads? [22.075705411944895]
  SWE-fficiency is a benchmark for evaluating repository-level performance optimization on real workloads.<n>Our suite contains 498 tasks across nine widely used data-science, machine-learning, and HPC repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T17:55:09Z)
• Using Copilot Agent Mode to Automate Library Migration: A Quantitative Assessment [0.5735035463793009]
  Keeping software systems up to date is essential to avoid technical debt, security vulnerabilities, and the rigidity typical of legacy systems.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and agentic coding systems offer new opportunities for automating such maintenance tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T17:05:13Z)
• MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers [86.00932417210477]
  We introduce MCP-Universe, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic and hard tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers.<n>Our benchmark encompasses 6 core domains spanning 11 different MCP servers: Location Navigation, Repository Management, Financial Analysis, 3D Design, Browser Automation, and Web Searching.<n>We find that even SOTA models such as GPT-5 (43.72%), Grok-4 (33.33%) and Claude-4.0-Sonnet (29.44%) exhibit significant performance limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T13:28:58Z)
• Automated Validation of LLM-based Evaluators for Software Engineering Artifacts [0.7548538278943616]
  REFINE (Ranking Evaluators for FIne grained Nuanced Evaluation) is an automated framework for benchmarking large language models (LLMs)<n> REFINE applies novel generation techniques to automatically synthesize artifacts with progressively reduced quality.<n>It quantifies each candidate evaluator configuration by measuring how closely its rankings align with expected ordering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T18:52:01Z)
• ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks [64.86209459039313]
  ThinkGeo is an agentic benchmark designed to evaluate tool-augmented agents on remote sensing tasks via structured tool use and multi-step planning.<n>We implement a ReAct-style interaction loop and evaluate both open and closed-source LLMs on 486 structured agentic tasks with 1,773 expert-verified reasoning steps.<n>Our analysis reveals notable disparities in tool accuracy and planning consistency across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:59:38Z)
• AutoPT: How Far Are We from the End2End Automated Web Penetration Testing? [54.65079443902714]
  We introduce AutoPT, an automated penetration testing agent based on the principle of PSM driven by LLMs. Our results show that AutoPT outperforms the baseline framework ReAct on the GPT-4o mini model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T13:24:30Z)
• Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows? [73.81908518992161]
  We introduce Spider2-V, the first multimodal agent benchmark focusing on professional data science and engineering. Spider2-V features real-world tasks in authentic computer environments and incorporating 20 enterprise-level professional applications. These tasks evaluate the ability of a multimodal agent to perform data-related tasks by writing code and managing the GUI in enterprise data software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T17:54:37Z)
• Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents [12.19683999553113]
  We build Agentless -- an agentless approach to automatically solve software development problems. Compared to the verbose and complex setup of agent-based approaches, Agentless employs a simplistic three-phase process of localization, repair, and patch validation. Our results on the popular SWE-bench Lite benchmark show that surprisingly the simplistic Agentless is able to achieve both the highest performance and low cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:24:45Z)
• Automated Program Repair: Emerging trends pose and expose problems for benchmarks [7.437224586066947]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used to generate software patches. Evaluations and comparisons must take care to ensure that results are valid and likely to generalize. This is especially true for LLMs, whose large and often poorly-disclosed training datasets may include problems on which they are evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T23:09:43Z)
• Planning, Creation, Usage: Benchmarking LLMs for Comprehensive Tool Utilization in Real-World Complex Scenarios [93.68764280953624]
  UltraTool is a novel benchmark designed to improve and evaluate Large Language Models' ability in tool utilization. It emphasizes real-world complexities, demanding accurate, multi-step planning for effective problem-solving. A key feature of UltraTool is its independent evaluation of planning with natural language, which happens before tool usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T16:52:56Z)
• TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
  We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation. Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed. Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z)
• MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation [96.71370747681078]
  We introduce MLAgentBench, a suite of 13 tasks ranging from improving model performance on CIFAR-10 to recent research problems like BabyLM. For each task, an agent can perform actions like reading/writing files, executing code, and inspecting outputs. We benchmark agents based on Claude v1.0, Claude v2.1, Claude v3 Opus, GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, Gemini-Pro, and Mixtral and find that a Claude v3 Opus agent is the best in terms of success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T04:06:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.