Generative and Nonparametric Approaches for Conditional Distribution Estimation: Methods, Perspectives, and Comparative Evaluations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22650v1
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 07:10:36 GMT
• Title: Generative and Nonparametric Approaches for Conditional Distribution Estimation: Methods, Perspectives, and Comparative Evaluations
• Authors: Yen-Shiu Chin, Zhi-Yu Jou, Toshinari Morimoto, Chia-Tse Wang, Ming-Chung Chang, Tso-Jung Yen, Su-Yun Huang, Tailen Hsing,
• Abstract summary: This article reviews and compares several representative approaches spanning classical nonparametric methods and modern generative models.<n>The performance metrics used for the estimated conditional distribution include the mean-squared errors of conditional mean and standard deviation.
• Score: 2.0236506875465863
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The inference of conditional distributions is a fundamental problem in statistics, essential for prediction, uncertainty quantification, and probabilistic modeling. A wide range of methodologies have been developed for this task. This article reviews and compares several representative approaches spanning classical nonparametric methods and modern generative models. We begin with the single-index method of Hall and Yao (2005), which estimates the conditional distribution through a dimension-reducing index and nonparametric smoothing of the resulting one-dimensional cumulative conditional distribution function. We then examine the basis-expansion approaches, including FlexCode (Izbicki and Lee, 2017) and DeepCDE (Dalmasso et al., 2020), which convert conditional density estimation into a set of nonparametric regression problems. In addition, we discuss two recent generative simulation-based methods that leverage modern deep generative architectures: the generative conditional distribution sampler (Zhou et al., 2023) and the conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model (Fu et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2025). A systematic numerical comparison of these approaches is provided using a unified evaluation framework that ensures fairness and reproducibility. The performance metrics used for the estimated conditional distribution include the mean-squared errors of conditional mean and standard deviation, as well as the Wasserstein distance. We also discuss their flexibility and computational costs, highlighting the distinct advantages and limitations of each approach.

Related papers

• Flow-Based Density Ratio Estimation for Intractable Distributions with Applications in Genomics [80.05951561886123]
  We leverage condition-aware flow matching to derive a single dynamical formulation for tracking density ratios along generative trajectories.<n>We demonstrate competitive performance on simulated benchmarks for closed-form ratio estimation, and show that our method supports versatile tasks in single-cell genomics data analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T17:27:55Z)
• Learning Survival Distributions with the Asymmetric Laplace Distribution [16.401141867387324]
  We propose a parametric survival analysis method based on the Asymmetric Laplace Distribution (ALD)<n>This distribution allows for closed-form calculation of popular event summaries such as mean, median, mode, variation, and quantiles.<n>We show that the proposed method outperforms parametric and nonparametric approaches in terms of accuracy, discrimination and calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T17:34:41Z)
• Inflationary Flows: Calibrated Bayesian Inference with Diffusion-Based Models [0.0]
  We show how diffusion-based models can be repurposed for performing principled, identifiable Bayesian inference.<n>We show how such maps can be learned via standard DBM training using a novel noise schedule.<n>The result is a class of highly expressive generative models, uniquely defined on a low-dimensional latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T19:58:19Z)
• Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity [81.30551968980143]
  We develop a new method for generating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution. Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of conditional coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:44:48Z)
• Unveil Conditional Diffusion Models with Classifier-free Guidance: A Sharp Statistical Theory [87.00653989457834]
  Conditional diffusion models serve as the foundation of modern image synthesis and find extensive application in fields like computational biology and reinforcement learning. Despite the empirical success, theory of conditional diffusion models is largely missing. This paper bridges the gap by presenting a sharp statistical theory of distribution estimation using conditional diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:08:24Z)
• Partially factorized variational inference for high-dimensional mixed models [0.0]
  Variational inference is a popular way to perform such computations, especially in the Bayesian context.<n>We show that standard mean-field variational inference dramatically underestimates posterior uncertainty in high-dimensions.<n>We then show how appropriately relaxing the mean-field assumption leads to methods whose uncertainty quantification does not deteriorate in high-dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T16:12:37Z)
• Semi-Parametric Inference for Doubly Stochastic Spatial Point Processes: An Approximate Penalized Poisson Likelihood Approach [3.085995273374333]
  Doubly-stochastic point processes model the occurrence of events over a spatial domain as an inhomogeneous process conditioned on the realization of a random intensity function. Existing implementations of doubly-stochastic spatial models are computationally demanding, often have limited theoretical guarantee, and/or rely on restrictive assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-11T19:48:39Z)
• MAUVE Scores for Generative Models: Theory and Practice [95.86006777961182]
  We present MAUVE, a family of comparison measures between pairs of distributions such as those encountered in the generative modeling of text or images. We find that MAUVE can quantify the gaps between the distributions of human-written text and those of modern neural language models. We demonstrate in the vision domain that MAUVE can identify known properties of generated images on par with or better than existing metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-30T07:37:40Z)
• The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z)
• Evaluating Aleatoric Uncertainty via Conditional Generative Models [15.494774321257939]
  We study conditional generative models for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. We introduce two metrics to measure the discrepancy between two conditional distributions. We demonstrate numerically how our metrics provide correct measurements of conditional distributional discrepancies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T05:39:04Z)
• Divergence Frontiers for Generative Models: Sample Complexity, Quantization Level, and Frontier Integral [58.434753643798224]
  Divergence frontiers have been proposed as an evaluation framework for generative models. We establish non-asymptotic bounds on the sample complexity of the plug-in estimator of divergence frontiers. We also augment the divergence frontier framework by investigating the statistical performance of smoothed distribution estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T06:26:25Z)
• Loss function based second-order Jensen inequality and its application to particle variational inference [112.58907653042317]
  Particle variational inference (PVI) uses an ensemble of models as an empirical approximation for the posterior distribution. PVI iteratively updates each model with a repulsion force to ensure the diversity of the optimized models. We derive a novel generalization error bound and show that it can be reduced by enhancing the diversity of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T12:13:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.