AutoMerge: Search-Based Model Merging Framework for Effective Model Reuse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22748v1
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:27:01 GMT
• Title: AutoMerge: Search-Based Model Merging Framework for Effective Model Reuse
• Authors: You Lu, Jiyang Zhang, Bihuan Chen, Chaofeng Sha, Dingji Wang, Xin Peng,
• Abstract summary: Recently, model merging has emerged in the domain of large language models (LLMs) as a training-free approach.<n>No prior work has systematically investigated whether such an approach can be effectively applied to other deep learning models.<n>We present the first systematic study that evaluates five model merging techniques on three distinct model architectures.
• Score: 8.950520457150178
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Software reuse has long been recognized as a critical and widely studied topic in software engineering, offering substantial benefits in reducing development costs, improving software quality, and enhancing operational efficiency. This paradigm extends into deep learning through model reuse. Recently, model merging has emerged in the domain of large language models (LLMs) as a training-free approach that takes multiple task-specific models with the same architecture as source models and merges them without retraining, enhancing model reuse within LLMs. However, no prior work has systematically investigated whether such an approach can be effectively applied to other deep learning models with different architectures across domains. To bridge this gap, we present the first systematic study that evaluates five model merging techniques on three distinct model architectures across three domains: LLMs, image classification, and autonomous driving. Our findings reveal that directly applying existing model merging techniques leads to highly inconsistent results and falls notably short of their success within LLMs. Moreover, a single model merging technique often fails to handle the heterogeneous structural properties within a model, limiting its applicability to different model architectures across domains. Furthermore, the effectiveness of model merging techniques is highly sensitive to hyperparameter configurations, thereby constraining their potential for broader adoption. Inspired by these insights, we propose AutoMerge, a novel search-based model merging framework that first segments complex models into multiple heterogeneous blocks and then systematically explores the merging space to identify the merging technique and its hyperparameter configuration.

Related papers

• Merge and Guide: Unifying Model Merging and Guided Decoding for Controllable Multi-Objective Generation [49.98025799046136]
  We introduce Merge-And-GuidE, a two-stage framework that leverages model merging for guided decoding.<n>In Stage 1, MAGE resolves a compatibility problem between the guidance and base models.<n>In Stage 2, we merge explicit and implicit value models into a unified guidance proxy, which then steers the decoding of the base model from Stage 1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T11:10:07Z)
• Speed Always Wins: A Survey on Efficient Architectures for Large Language Models [51.817121227562964]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have delivered impressive results in language understanding, generation, reasoning, and pushes the ability boundary of multimodal models.<n> Transformer models, as the foundation of modern LLMs, offer a strong baseline with excellent scaling properties.<n>The traditional transformer architecture requires substantial computations and poses significant obstacles for large-scale training and practical deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T14:13:46Z)
• OptMerge: Unifying Multimodal LLM Capabilities and Modalities via Model Merging [124.91183814854126]
  Model merging seeks to combine multiple expert models into a single model.<n>We introduce a benchmark for model merging research that clearly divides the tasks for MLLM training and evaluation.<n>We find that model merging offers a promising way for building improved MLLMs without requiring training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:23:14Z)
• AdaMMS: Model Merging for Heterogeneous Multimodal Large Language Models with Unsupervised Coefficient Optimization [86.8133939108057]
  We propose AdaMMS, a novel model merging method tailored for heterogeneous MLLMs.<n>Our method tackles the challenges in three steps: mapping, merging and searching.<n>As the first model merging method capable of merging heterogeneous MLLMs without labeled data, AdaMMS outperforms previous model merging methods on various vision-language benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T05:13:02Z)
• From Task-Specific Models to Unified Systems: A Review of Model Merging Approaches [13.778158813149833]
  This paper establishes a new taxonomy of model merging methods, systematically comparing different approaches and providing an overview of key developments.<n>Despite the rapid progress in this field, a comprehensive taxonomy and survey summarizing recent advances and predicting future directions are still lacking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T02:17:31Z)
• A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval [59.61734783818073]
  The period from 2019 to the present has represented one of the biggest paradigm shifts in information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP)<n>We trace the development from traditional term-based methods to modern neural approaches, particularly highlighting the impact of transformer-based models and subsequent large language models (LLMs)<n>We conclude with a forward-looking discussion of emerging challenges and future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:42:58Z)
• A Model Is Not Built By A Single Prompt: LLM-Based Domain Modeling With Question Decomposition [4.123601037699469]
  In real-world domain modeling, engineers usually decompose complex tasks into easily solvable sub-tasks. We propose an LLM-based domain modeling approach via question decomposition, similar to developer's modeling process. Preliminary results show that our approach outperforms the single-prompt-based prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T14:28:04Z)
• HM3: Hierarchical Multi-Objective Model Merging for Pretrained Models [28.993221775758702]
  Model merging is a technique that combines multiple large pretrained models into a single model with enhanced performance and broader task adaptability. This paper marks a significant advance toward more flexible and comprehensive model merging techniques. We train policy and value networks using offline sampling of weight vectors, which are then employed for the online optimization of merging strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T16:31:31Z)
• Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunities [89.40778301238642]
  Model merging is an efficient empowerment technique in the machine learning community. There is a significant gap in the literature regarding a systematic and thorough review of these techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:58:48Z)
• Model Merging and Safety Alignment: One Bad Model Spoils the Bunch [70.614652904151]
  Merging Large Language Models (LLMs) is a cost-effective technique for combining multiple expert LLMs into a single versatile model. Current approaches often overlook the importance of safety alignment during merging, leading to highly misaligned models. We evaluate several popular model merging techniques, demonstrating that existing methods do not only transfer domain expertise but also propagate misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:59:58Z)
• An Empirical Study of Multimodal Model Merging [148.48412442848795]
  Model merging is a technique that fuses multiple models trained on different tasks to generate a multi-task solution. We conduct our study for a novel goal where we can merge vision, language, and cross-modal transformers of a modality-specific architecture. We propose two metrics that assess the distance between weights to be merged and can serve as an indicator of the merging outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T15:43:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.