Beyond Abstract Compliance: Operationalising trust in AI as a moral relationship

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22769v1
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:48:24 GMT
• Title: Beyond Abstract Compliance: Operationalising trust in AI as a moral relationship
• Authors: Lameck Mbangula Amugongo, Tutaleni Asino, Nicola J Bidwell,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes some expanded principles for trust in AI that can be incorporated into common development methods.<n>We draw on relational ethics and, in particular, African communitarian philosophies to foreground the nuances of inclusive, participatory processes.<n>Involving communities throughout the AI lifecycle can foster meaningful relationships with AI design and development teams.
• Score: 1.0498094137943175
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Dominant approaches, e.g. the EU's "Trustworthy AI framework", treat trust as a property that can be designed for, evaluated, and governed according to normative and technical criteria. They do not address how trust is subjectively cultivated and experienced, culturally embedded, and inherently relational. This paper proposes some expanded principles for trust in AI that can be incorporated into common development methods and frame trust as a dynamic, temporal relationship, which involves transparency and mutual respect. We draw on relational ethics and, in particular, African communitarian philosophies, to foreground the nuances of inclusive, participatory processes and long-term relationships with communities. Involving communities throughout the AI lifecycle can foster meaningful relationships with AI design and development teams that incrementally build trust and promote more equitable and context-sensitive AI systems. We illustrate how trust-enabling principles based on African relational ethics can be operationalised, using two use-cases for AI: healthcare and education.

Related papers

• Enriching Moral Perspectives on AI: Concepts of Trust amongst Africans [2.9108763024251805]
  We surveyed 157 people with professional and/or educational interests in AI from 25 African countries.<n>Most respondents had links with workshops about trust and AI in Africa in Namibia and Ghana.<n>Our study motivates more empirical research about the ways trust is practically enacted and experienced in African social realities of AI design, use and governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T12:04:40Z)
• Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators and users, modelling their strategic choices under different regulatory scenarios.<n>Our research identifies emerging behaviours of strategic AI agents, which tend to adopt more "pessimistic" stances than pure game-theoretic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T15:41:21Z)
• On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective [377.2483044466149]
  Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools.<n>Their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive framework to address these challenges through three key contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T06:20:36Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [51.85131234265026]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
  Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z)
• Who to Trust, How and Why: Untangling AI Ethics Principles, Trustworthiness and Trust [0.0]
  We argue for the need to distinguish these concepts more clearly. We discuss that trust in AI involves not only reliance on the system itself, but also trust in the developers of the AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T05:00:34Z)
• A multilevel framework for AI governance [6.230751621285321]
  We propose a multilevel governance approach that involves governments, corporations, and citizens. The levels of governance combined with the dimensions of trust in AI provide practical insights that can be used to further enhance user experiences and inform public policy related to AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T03:59:16Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI [4.729969944853141]
  We argue that public distrust of AI originates from the under-development of a regulatory ecosystem that would guarantee the trustworthiness of the AIs that pervade society. We elaborate the pivotal role of externally auditable AI documentation within this model and the work to be done to ensure it is effective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-22T22:01:30Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.