A Comparative Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models for 2D Object Detection under SOTIF Conditions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22830v1
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 10:58:24 GMT
• Title: A Comparative Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models for 2D Object Detection under SOTIF Conditions
• Authors: Ji Zhou, Yilin Ding, Yongqi Zhao, Jiachen Xu, Arno Eichberger,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a systematic evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) for safety-critical 2D object detection.<n>The PeSOTIF dataset is a benchmark specifically curated for long-tail traffic scenarios and environmental degradations.<n> Experimental results reveal a critical trade-off: top-performing LVLMs surpass the YOLO baseline in recall by over 25% in complex natural scenarios.
• Score: 2.7694879331630182
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reliable environmental perception remains one of the main obstacles for safe operation of automated vehicles. Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF) concerns safety risks from perception insufficiencies, particularly under adverse conditions where conventional detectors often falter. While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate promising semantic reasoning, their quantitative effectiveness for safety-critical 2D object detection is underexplored. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of ten representative LVLMs using the PeSOTIF dataset, a benchmark specifically curated for long-tail traffic scenarios and environmental degradations. Performance is quantitatively compared against the classical perception approach, a YOLO-based detector. Experimental results reveal a critical trade-off: top-performing LVLMs (e.g., Gemini 3, Doubao) surpass the YOLO baseline in recall by over 25% in complex natural scenarios, exhibiting superior robustness to visual degradation. Conversely, the baseline retains an advantage in geometric precision for synthetic perturbations. These findings highlight the complementary strengths of semantic reasoning versus geometric regression, supporting the use of LVLMs as high-level safety validators in SOTIF-oriented automated driving systems.

Related papers

• Cross-Paradigm Evaluation of Gaze-Based Semantic Object Identification for Intelligent Vehicles [2.867517731896504]
  This paper tackles this challenge as a semantic identification task from the road scenes captured by a vehicle's front-view camera.<n>Three vision-based approaches are investigated: direct object detection (YOLOv13), segmentation-assisted classification (SAM2 paired with EfficientNetV2 versus YOLOv13), and query-based Vision-Language Models, VLMs.<n>The results demonstrate that the direct object detection (YOLOv13) and Qwen2.5-VL-32b significantly outperform other approaches, achieving Macro F1-Scores over 0.84.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T21:43:02Z)
• Semantic Misalignment in Vision-Language Models under Perceptual Degradation [2.9140696506330723]
  We study semantic misalignment in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) under controlled degradation of visual perception.<n>We observe severe failures in downstream VLM behavior, including hallucinated object mentions, omission of safety-critical entities, and inconsistent safety judgments.<n>Our results reveal a clear disconnect between pixel-level robustness and multimodal semantic reliability, highlighting a critical limitation of current VLM-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T09:13:05Z)
• Think-Reflect-Revise: A Policy-Guided Reflective Framework for Safety Alignment in Large Vision Language Models [58.17589701432514]
  Think-Reflect-Revise (TRR) is a training framework designed to enhance the safety alignment of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs)<n>We first build a Reflective Safety Reasoning (ReSafe) dataset with 5,000 examples that follow a think-reflect-revise process.<n>We then fine-tune the target model using the ReSafe dataset to initialize reflective behavior, and finally reinforce policy-guided reflection through reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T03:46:03Z)
• Breaking the Safety-Capability Tradeoff: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Maintains Safety Guardrails in LLMs [3.198812241868092]
  reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising alternative that optimize models on objectively measurable tasks.<n>We present the first comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis of safety properties in RLVR.<n> Empirically, we conduct extensive experiments across five adversarial safety benchmarks, demonstrating that RLVR can simultaneously enhance reasoning capabilities while maintaining or improving safety guardrails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T04:36:34Z)
• Sycophancy Mitigation Through Reinforcement Learning with Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories [58.988535279557546]
  We introduce textbf sycophancy Mitigation through Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories.<n>We show that SMART significantly reduces sycophantic behavior while preserving strong performance on out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T17:09:14Z)
• Adaptive Dual Uncertainty Optimization: Boosting Monocular 3D Object Detection under Test-Time Shifts [80.32933059529135]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) methods have emerged to adapt to target distributions during inference.<n>We propose Dual Uncertainty Optimization (DUO), the first TTA framework designed to jointly minimize both uncertainties for robust M3OD.<n>In parallel, we design a semantic-aware normal field constraint that preserves geometric coherence in regions with clear semantic cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T07:09:21Z)
• Fundamental Safety-Capability Trade-offs in Fine-tuning Large Language Models [92.38300626647342]
  Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) on some task-specific datasets has been a primary use of LLMs.<n>This paper presents a theoretical framework for understanding the interplay between safety and capability in two primary safety-aware LLM fine-tuning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T20:41:57Z)
• REVAL: A Comprehension Evaluation on Reliability and Values of Large Vision-Language Models [59.445672459851274]
  REVAL is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the textbfREliability and textbfVALue of Large Vision-Language Models.<n>REVAL encompasses over 144K image-text Visual Question Answering (VQA) samples, structured into two primary sections: Reliability and Values.<n>We evaluate 26 models, including mainstream open-source LVLMs and prominent closed-source models like GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5-Pro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T07:54:35Z)
• Source-Free Domain Adaptive Object Detection with Semantics Compensation [54.00183496587841]
  We introduce Weak-to-strong Semantics Compensation (WSCo) for strong data augmentation.<n>WSCo compensates for the class-relevant semantics that may be lost during strong augmentation on the fly.<n>WSCo can be implemented as a generic plug-in, easily integrable with any existing SFOD pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T23:32:06Z)
• USC: Uncompromising Spatial Constraints for Safety-Oriented 3D Object Detectors in Autonomous Driving [7.355977594790584]
  We consider the safety-oriented performance of 3D object detectors in autonomous driving contexts.<n>We present uncompromising spatial constraints (USC), which characterize a simple yet important localization requirement.<n>We incorporate the quantitative measures into common loss functions to enable safety-oriented fine-tuning for existing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T14:03:08Z)
• Exploring Robustness of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentation [74.05906222376608]
  We propose adversarial self-supervision UDA (or ASSUDA) that maximizes the agreement between clean images and their adversarial examples by a contrastive loss in the output space. This paper is rooted in two observations: (i) the robustness of UDA methods in semantic segmentation remains unexplored, which pose a security concern in this field; and (ii) although commonly used self-supervision (e.g., rotation and jigsaw) benefits image tasks such as classification and recognition, they fail to provide the critical supervision signals that could learn discriminative representation for segmentation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-23T01:50:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.