Learning to Decode Against Compositional Hallucination in Video Multimodal Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00559v1
• Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 06:50:43 GMT
• Title: Learning to Decode Against Compositional Hallucination in Video Multimodal Large Language Models
• Authors: Wenbin Xing, Quanxing Zha, Lizheng Zu, Mengran Li, Ming Li, Junchi Yan,
• Abstract summary: We introduce OmniVCHall, a benchmark designed to evaluate both isolated and compositional hallucinations in video multimodal large language models (VLLMs)<n>We propose TriCD, a contrastive decoding framework with a triple-pathway calibration mechanism.<n> Experimental results show that TriCD consistently improves performance across two representative backbones, achieving an average accuracy improvement of over 10%.
• Score: 44.84227796501077
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Current research on video hallucination mitigation primarily focuses on isolated error types, leaving compositional hallucinations, arising from incorrect reasoning over multiple interacting spatial and temporal factors largely underexplored. We introduce OmniVCHall, a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate both isolated and compositional hallucinations in video multimodal large language models (VLLMs). OmniVCHall spans diverse video domains, introduces a novel camera-based hallucination type, and defines a fine-grained taxonomy, together with adversarial answer options (e.g., "All are correct" and "None of the above") to prevent shortcut reasoning. The evaluations of 39 representative VLLMs reveal that even advanced models (e.g., Qwen3-VL and GPT-5) exhibit substantial performance degradation. We propose TriCD, a contrastive decoding framework with a triple-pathway calibration mechanism. An adaptive perturbation controller dynamically selects distracting operations to construct negative video variants, while a saliency-guided enhancement module adaptively reinforces grounded token-wise visual evidences. These components are optimized via reinforcement learning to encourage precise decision-making under compositional hallucination settings. Experimental results show that TriCD consistently improves performance across two representative backbones, achieving an average accuracy improvement of over 10%. The data and code can be find at https://github.com/BMRETURN/OmniVCHall.

Related papers

• SEASON: Mitigating Temporal Hallucination in Video Large Language Models via Self-Diagnostic Contrastive Decoding [30.820850789099932]
  We propose a training-free method that adaptively enhances temporal and spatial faithfulness for each output token.<n>SEASON outperforms all existing training-free hallucination mitigation approaches on three hallucination examination benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T10:17:20Z)
• Beyond Single Models: Mitigating Multimodal Hallucinations via Adaptive Token Ensemble Decoding [41.828387997311474]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have recently achieved impressive results in multimodal tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering.<n>They remain prone to object hallucination -- generating descriptions of nonexistent or misidentified objects.<n>We propose Adaptive Token Ensemble Decoding (ATED), a training-free, token-level ensemble framework that mitigates hallucination by aggregating predictions from multiple LVLMs during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T06:11:24Z)
• Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models by Self-Injecting Hallucinations [73.37711261605271]
  hallucination mitigation methods are mainly based on preference alignment and require external human annotations or auxiliary models for preference data collection.<n>We propose Autonomous Preference Alignment via Self-Injection (APASI), a novel and generalizable method that mitigates hallucinations without external dependencies.<n>APASI leverages the target LVLM to self-inject hallucinations into a generated response, creating a pair of responses with varying preference levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-14T14:26:53Z)
• ELV-Halluc: Benchmarking Semantic Aggregation Hallucinations in Long Video Understanding [61.526407756322264]
  We introduce ELV-Halluc, the first benchmark dedicated to long-video hallucination.<n>We find that models are more prone to SAH on rapidly changing semantics.<n>We also achieve improvements on both ELV-Halluc and Video-MME.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T10:25:03Z)
• Generate, but Verify: Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models with Retrospective Resampling [78.78822033285938]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual understanding but often suffer from visual hallucinations.<n>In this work, we introduce REVERSE, a unified framework that integrates hallucination-aware training with on-the-fly self-verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:59:22Z)
• Decoupling Contrastive Decoding: Robust Hallucination Mitigation in Multimodal Large Language Models [23.846371966667927]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) generate outputs misaligned with obvious visual or factual evidence.<n>We propose a novel framework: Decoupling Contrastive Decoding (DCD)<n>DCD decouples the learning of positive and negative samples in preference datasets, and trains separate positive and negative image projections within the MLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T02:59:18Z)
• Exploring Hallucination of Large Multimodal Models in Video Understanding: Benchmark, Analysis and Mitigation [49.885797244626694]
  hallucination of large multimodal models (LMMs) provides responses that appear correct but are actually incorrect.<n>This paper aims to study the hallucination problem of LMMs in video modality, which is dynamic and more challenging compared to static modalities like images and text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T13:12:17Z)
• VideoHallucer: Evaluating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Hallucinations in Large Video-Language Models [59.05674402770661]
  This work introduces VideoHallucer, the first comprehensive benchmark for hallucination detection in large video-language models (LVLMs) VideoHallucer categorizes hallucinations into two main types: intrinsic and extrinsic, offering further subcategories for detailed analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T06:21:59Z)
• Thinking Hallucination for Video Captioning [0.76146285961466]
  In video captioning, there are two kinds of hallucination: object and action hallucination. We identify three main factors: (i) inadequate visual features extracted from pre-trained models, (ii) improper influences of source and target contexts during multi-modal fusion, and (iii) exposure bias in the training strategy. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the MSR-Video to Text (MSR-VTT) and the Microsoft Research Video Description Corpus (MSVD) datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T06:15:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.