Model Specific Task Similarity for Vision Language Model Selection via Layer Conductance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01346v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 17:29:43 GMT
• Title: Model Specific Task Similarity for Vision Language Model Selection via Layer Conductance
• Authors: Wei Yang, Hong Xie, Tao Tan, Xin Li, Defu Lian, Enhong Chen,
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework that grounds model selection in the internal functional dynamics of the visual encoder.<n>Our approach represents each task via layer wise conductance and derives a target-conditioned block importance distribution through entropy regularized alignment.<n>Building on this, we introduce Directional Conductance Divergence (DCD), an asymmetric metric that quantifies how effectively a source task covers the target's salient functional blocks.
• Score: 92.72779885657373
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While open sourced Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have proliferated, selecting the optimal pretrained model for a specific downstream task remains challenging. Exhaustive evaluation is often infeasible due to computational constraints and data limitations in few shot scenarios. Existing selection methods fail to fully address this: they either rely on data-intensive proxies or use symmetric textual descriptors that neglect the inherently directional and model-specific nature of transferability. To address this problem, we propose a framework that grounds model selection in the internal functional dynamics of the visual encoder. Our approach represents each task via layer wise conductance and derives a target-conditioned block importance distribution through entropy regularized alignment. Building on this, we introduce Directional Conductance Divergence (DCD), an asymmetric metric that quantifies how effectively a source task covers the target's salient functional blocks. This allows for predicting target model rankings by aggregating source task ranks without direct inference. Experimental results on 48 VLMs across 21 datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 14.7% improvement in NDCG@5 over SWAB.

Related papers

• TopoCurate:Modeling Interaction Topology for Tool-Use Agent Training [53.93696896939915]
  Training tool-use agents typically rely on Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on successful trajectories and Reinforcement Learning (RL) on pass-rate-selected tasks.<n>We propose TopoCurate, an interaction-aware framework that projects multi-trial rollouts from the same task into a unified semantic quotient topology.<n>TopoCurate achieves consistent gains of 4.2% (SFT) and 6.9% (RL) over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T10:38:54Z)
• Neural Coherence : Find higher performance to out-of-distribution tasks from few samples [22.92306176087978]
  This work proposes a novel approach for model selection that operates reliably on just a few unlabeled examples from the target task.<n>We provide experiments where models are pre-trained on ImageNet1K and examine target domains consisting of Food-101, PlantNet-300K and iNaturalist.<n>Our approach significantly improves generalization across these different target domains compared to established baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T16:55:41Z)
• Every Step Counts: Decoding Trajectories as Authorship Fingerprints of dLLMs [63.82840470917859]
  We show that the decoding mechanism of dLLMs can be used as a powerful tool for model attribution.<n>We propose a novel information extraction scheme called the Directed Decoding Map (DDM), which captures structural relationships between decoding steps and better reveals model-specific behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T06:25:10Z)
• Task-Specific Data Selection for Instruction Tuning via Monosemantic Neuronal Activations [19.25205110583291]
  A critical bottleneck is selecting the most relevant data to maximize task-specific performance.<n>Existing data selection approaches include unstable influence-based methods and more stable distribution alignment methods.<n>We introduce a dedicated similarity metric for this space to better identify task-relevant data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T11:35:57Z)
• Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Models [79.2162092822111]
  We systematically evaluate reinforcement learning (RL) and control-based methods on a suite of navigation tasks.<n>We employ a latent dynamics model using the Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) and employ it for planning.<n>Our results show that model-free RL benefits most from large amounts of high-quality data, whereas model-based planning generalizes better to unseen layouts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:39:41Z)
• Modeling Multi-Task Model Merging as Adaptive Projective Gradient Descent [72.10987117380584]
  Merging multiple expert models offers a promising approach for performing multi-task learning without accessing their original data.<n>We find existing methods discard task-specific information that, while causing conflicts, is crucial for performance.<n>Our approach consistently outperforms previous methods, achieving state-of-the-art results across diverse architectures and tasks in both vision and NLP domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T12:45:21Z)
• AgentOhana: Design Unified Data and Training Pipeline for Effective Agent Learning [98.26836657967162]
  textbfAgentOhana aggregates agent trajectories from distinct environments, spanning a wide array of scenarios. textbfxLAM-v0.1, a large action model tailored for AI agents, demonstrates exceptional performance across various benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:56:26Z)
• Task-Distributionally Robust Data-Free Meta-Learning [99.56612787882334]
  Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to efficiently learn new tasks by leveraging multiple pre-trained models without requiring their original training data. For the first time, we reveal two major challenges hindering their practical deployments: Task-Distribution Shift ( TDS) and Task-Distribution Corruption (TDC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T15:46:54Z)
• Building a Winning Team: Selecting Source Model Ensembles using a Submodular Transferability Estimation Approach [20.86345962679122]
  Estimating the transferability of publicly available pretrained models to a target task has assumed an important place for transfer learning tasks. We propose a novel Optimal tranSport-based suBmOdular tRaNsferability metric (OSBORN) to estimate the transferability of an ensemble of models to a downstream task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T17:57:31Z)
• Towards Estimating Transferability using Hard Subsets [25.86053764521497]
  We propose HASTE, a new strategy to estimate the transferability of a source model to a particular target task using only a harder subset of target data. We show that HASTE can be used with any existing transferability metric to improve their reliability. Our experimental results across multiple source model architectures, target datasets, and transfer learning tasks show that HASTE modified metrics are consistently better or on par with the state of the art transferability metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T14:50:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.