How Notations Evolve: A Historical Analysis with Implications for Supporting User-Defined Abstractions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01525v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 01:38:05 GMT
• Title: How Notations Evolve: A Historical Analysis with Implications for Supporting User-Defined Abstractions
• Abstract summary: Recent AI systems promise a new set of informal interactions with computers through natural language and other notational forms.<n>These informal interactions can then lead to formal representations, but depend upon pre-existing formalisms known to both humans and AI.<n>We conduct a comparative historical analysis of notation development to identify some relevant characteristics.
• Score: 27.219003138635728
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Traditional human-computer interaction takes place through formally-specified systems like structured UIs and programming languages. Recent AI systems promise a new set of informal interactions with computers through natural language and other notational forms. These informal interactions can then lead to formal representations, but depend upon pre-existing formalisms known to both humans and AI. What about novel formalisms and notations? How are new abstractions created, evolved, and incrementally formalized over time -- and how might new systems, in turn, be explicitly designed to support these processes? We conduct a comparative historical analysis of notation development to identify some relevant characteristics. These include three social stages of notation development: invention & incubation, dispersion & divergence, and institutionalization & sanctification, as well as three functional stages: descriptive, generative, and evaluative. Within and across these stages, we detail several patterns, such as the role of linking and grounding metaphors, dimensions of meaningful variation, and analogical alignment. Finally, we offer some implications for design.

Related papers

• Does Syntax Matter? A Graph-Augmented Variational Topic Model for Computational Social Sciences [51.56484100374058]
  This paper introduces the Structural Contextual Probabilistic Topic Model ( SCPTM), an architecture that incorporates syntactic dependency relations into topic inference.<n>We evaluate seven topic modeling techniques across four corpora differing in register and discourse structure.<n>Results show that SCPTM's neural architecture yields substantial gains in document-topic alignment over generative baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T17:39:06Z)
• Human vs. Machine Deception: Distinguishing AI-Generated and Human-Written Fake News Using Ensemble Learning [0.13999481573773068]
  This study examines linguistic, structural, and emotional differences between human-written and AI-generated fake news.<n>A document-level feature representation is constructed using sentence structure, lexical diversity, punctuation patterns, readability indices, and emotion-based features.<n>The results show strong and consistent classification performance, with readability-based features emerging as the most informative predictors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T23:51:28Z)
• DiscoSum: Discourse-aware News Summarization [79.4884227574627]
  We introduce a novel approach to integrating discourse structure into summarization processes.<n>We present a novel summarization dataset where news articles are summarized multiple times in different ways across different social media platforms.<n>We develop a novel news discourse schema to describe summarization structures and a novel algorithm, DiscoSum, which employs beam search technique for structure-aware summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T22:00:30Z)
• Data2Concept2Text: An Explainable Multilingual Framework for Data Analysis Narration [42.95840730800478]
  This paper presents a complete explainable system that interprets a set of data, abstracts the underlying features and describes them in a natural language of choice.<n>The system relies on two crucial stages: (i) identifying emerging properties from data and transforming them into abstract concepts, and (ii) converting these concepts into natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T11:49:48Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• Non-verbal information in spontaneous speech -- towards a new framework of analysis [0.5559722082623594]
  This paper offers an analytical schema and a technological proof-of-concept for the categorization of prosodic signals. We present a classification process that disentangles prosodic phenomena of three orders. Disentangling prosodic patterns can direct a theory of communication and speech organization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T08:03:05Z)
• Unpacking Human-AI interactions: From interaction primitives to a design space [6.778055454461106]
  We show how these primitives can be combined into a set of interaction patterns. The motivation behind this is to provide a compact generalisation of existing practices. We discuss how this approach can be used towards a design space for Human-AI interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T12:27:18Z)
• Getting aligned on representational alignment [93.08284685325674]
  We study the study of representational alignment in cognitive science, neuroscience, and machine learning. Despite their overlapping interests, there is limited knowledge transfer between these fields. We propose a unifying framework that can serve as a common language for research on representational alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T17:47:58Z)
• Generative Models as a Complex Systems Science: How can we make sense of large language model behavior? [75.79305790453654]
  Coaxing out desired behavior from pretrained models, while avoiding undesirable ones, has redefined NLP. We argue for a systematic effort to decompose language model behavior into categories that explain cross-task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T22:58:41Z)
• Late-Binding Scholarship in the Age of AI: Navigating Legal and Normative Challenges of a New Form of Knowledge Production [8.497410878853309]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) is poised to enable a new leap in the creation of scholarly content. This article articulates ways in which those artifacts can be written, distributed, read, organized, and stored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T04:14:28Z)
• The Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth: Faithful and Controllable Dialogue Response Generation with Dataflow Transduction and Constrained Decoding [65.34601470417967]
  We describe a hybrid architecture for dialogue response generation that combines the strengths of neural language modeling and rule-based generation. Our experiments show that this system outperforms both rule-based and learned approaches in human evaluations of fluency, relevance, and truthfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T09:00:49Z)
• Modelling Compositionality and Structure Dependence in Natural Language [0.12183405753834563]
  Drawing on linguistics and set theory, a formalisation of these ideas is presented in the first half of this thesis. We see how cognitive systems that process language need to have certain functional constraints. Using the advances of word embedding techniques, a model of relational learning is simulated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-22T17:28:50Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.