Counting Hypothesis: Potential Mechanism of In-Context Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01687v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 05:57:33 GMT
• Title: Counting Hypothesis: Potential Mechanism of In-Context Learning
• Authors: Jung H. Lee, Sujith Vijayan,
• Abstract summary: In-Context Learning (ICL) indicates that large language models (LLMs) pretrained on a massive amount of data can learn specific tasks from input prompts' examples.<n>We propose 1the counting hypothesis' of ICL, which suggests that LLMs' encoding strategy may underlie ICL.
• Score: 0.4583541422554718
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In-Context Learning (ICL) indicates that large language models (LLMs) pretrained on a massive amount of data can learn specific tasks from input prompts' examples. ICL is notable for two reasons. First, it does not need modification of LLMs' internal structure. Second, it enables LLMs to perform a wide range of tasks/functions with a few examples demonstrating a desirable task. ICL opens up new ways to utilize LLMs in more domains, but its underlying mechanisms still remain poorly understood, making error correction and diagnosis extremely challenging. Thus, it is imperative that we better understand the limitations of ICL and how exactly LLMs support ICL. Inspired by ICL properties and LLMs' functional modules, we propose 1the counting hypothesis' of ICL, which suggests that LLMs' encoding strategy may underlie ICL, and provide supporting evidence.

Related papers

• ICLEval: Evaluating In-Context Learning Ability of Large Language Models [68.7494310749199]
  In-Context Learning (ICL) is a critical capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) as it empowers them to comprehend and reason across interconnected inputs.<n>Existing evaluation frameworks primarily focus on language abilities and knowledge, often overlooking the assessment of ICL ability.<n>We introduce the ICLEval benchmark to evaluate the ICL abilities of LLMs, which encompasses two key sub-abilities: exact copying and rule learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T08:06:10Z)
• Efficient Prompting for LLM-based Generative Internet of Things [88.84327500311464]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capacities on various tasks, and integrating the capacities of LLMs into the Internet of Things (IoT) applications has drawn much research attention recently. Due to security concerns, many institutions avoid accessing state-of-the-art commercial LLM services, requiring the deployment and utilization of open-source LLMs in a local network setting. We propose a LLM-based Generative IoT (GIoT) system deployed in the local network setting in this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T19:24:00Z)
• Is In-Context Learning Sufficient for Instruction Following in LLMs? [38.29072578390376]
  We show that, while effective, ICL alignment withAL still underperforms compared to instruction fine-tuning on the established benchmark MT-Bench.<n>We provide the first, to our knowledge, systematic comparison of ICL and instruction fine-tuning (IFT) for instruction following in the low data regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T09:28:56Z)
• Tokenization Matters! Degrading Large Language Models through Challenging Their Tokenization [12.418844515095035]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) tend to produce inaccurate responses to specific queries.<n> incorrect tokenization is the critical point that hinders LLMs in understanding the input precisely.<n>We construct an adversarial dataset, named as $textbfADT (Adrial dataset for Tokenizer)$, which draws upon the vocabularies of various open-source LLMs to challenge LLMs' tokenization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T11:39:59Z)
• Potential and Limitations of LLMs in Capturing Structured Semantics: A Case Study on SRL [78.80673954827773]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play a crucial role in capturing structured semantics to enhance language understanding, improve interpretability, and reduce bias. We propose using Semantic Role Labeling (SRL) as a fundamental task to explore LLMs' ability to extract structured semantics. We find interesting potential: LLMs can indeed capture semantic structures, and scaling-up doesn't always mirror potential. We are surprised to discover that significant overlap in the errors is made by both LLMs and untrained humans, accounting for almost 30% of all errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T11:44:05Z)
• Does In-Context Learning Really Learn? Rethinking How Large Language Models Respond and Solve Tasks via In-Context Learning [41.606494950216764]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful capability alongside the development of scaled-up large language models (LLMs) This paper decomposes the overall performance of ICL into three dimensions, label space, format, and discrimination. We show that ICL exhibits significant efficacy in regulating the label space and format, which helps LLMs respond to desired label words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T08:20:10Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Tasks [54.71034943526973]
  In-context learning (ICL) has become the default method for using large language models (LLMs) We find that ICL falls short of handling specification-heavy tasks, which are tasks with complicated and extensive task specifications. We identify three primary reasons: inability to specifically understand context, misalignment in task schema comprehension with humans, and inadequate long-text understanding ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T14:26:30Z)
• In-Context Exemplars as Clues to Retrieving from Large Associative Memory [1.2952137350423816]
  In-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to learn patterns from in-context exemplars without training. How to choose exemplars remains unclear due to the lack of understanding of how in-context learning works. Our study sheds new light on the mechanism of ICL by connecting it to memory retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T20:13:29Z)
• Hint-enhanced In-Context Learning wakes Large Language Models up for knowledge-intensive tasks [54.153914606302486]
  In-context learning (ICL) ability has emerged with the increasing scale of large language models (LLMs) We propose a new paradigm called Hint-enhanced In-Context Learning (HICL) to explore the power of ICL in open-domain question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T14:39:20Z)
• What In-Context Learning "Learns" In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learning [24.395288160951118]
  Large language models (LLMs) exploit in-context learning (ICL) to solve tasks with only a few demonstrations. We characterize two ways through which ICL leverages demonstrations. We show that models can achieve non-trivial performance with only TR, and TR does not further improve with larger models or more demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T18:05:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.