GDPR-Compliant Person Recognition in Industrial Environments Using MEMS-LiDAR and Hybrid Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01764v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 07:48:03 GMT
• Title: GDPR-Compliant Person Recognition in Industrial Environments Using MEMS-LiDAR and Hybrid Data
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a privacy-compliant approach based on Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems LiDAR (MEMS-LiDAR)<n>MEMS-LiDAR exclusively captures anonymized 3D point clouds and avoids personal identification features.<n>Results demonstrate that the hybrid data improves the average precision by 44 percentage points compared to a model trained exclusively with real data.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The reliable detection of unauthorized individuals in safety-critical industrial indoor spaces is crucial to avoid plant shutdowns, property damage, and personal hazards. Conventional vision-based methods that use deep-learning approaches for person recognition provide image information but are sensitive to lighting and visibility conditions and often violate privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union. Typically, detection systems based on deep learning require annotated data for training. Collecting and annotating such data, however, is highly time-consuming and due to manual treatments not necessarily error free. Therefore, this paper presents a privacy-compliant approach based on Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems LiDAR (MEMS-LiDAR), which exclusively captures anonymized 3D point clouds and avoids personal identification features. To compensate for the large amount of time required to record real LiDAR data and for post-processing and annotation, real recordings are augmented with synthetically generated scenes from the CARLA simulation framework. The results demonstrate that the hybrid data improves the average precision by 44 percentage points compared to a model trained exclusively with real data while reducing the manual annotation effort by 50 %. Thus, the proposed approach provides a scalable, cost-efficient alternative to purely real-data-based methods and systematically shows how synthetic LiDAR data can combine high performance in person detection with GDPR compliance in an industrial environment.

Related papers

• Optimal Transport for Efficient, Unsupervised Anomaly Detection on Industrial Data [3.4490389424908776]
  We introduce an Optimal Transport (OT)-based framework for anomaly detection, designed to detect deviations from normal behaviour in time-series sensor data.<n>The OT-based method requires minimal user input and adapts to real-time data without the need for labelled training data.<n>We evaluate our approach on three industrial datasets, from shipping, industrial HVAC systems, and publicly available benchmark data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-12T13:34:49Z)
• Phantoms and Disclosures: a Causal Framework for Auditing Synthetic Data [56.86147283213652]
  We present a customizable empirical auditing framework designed to detect and explain data disclosures.<n>Our framework introduces a mechanism to distinguish between "true disclosures"-where the system directly reproduces a user's information-and "phantom disclosures"-where the system incidentally generates a user's data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T16:54:02Z)
• Learning More with Less: A Generalizable, Self-Supervised Framework for Privacy-Preserving Capacity Estimation with EV Charging Data [84.37348569981307]
  We propose a first-of-its-kind capacity estimation model based on self-supervised pre-training.<n>Our model consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T08:58:35Z)
• Improving Noise Efficiency in Privacy-preserving Dataset Distillation [59.57846442477106]
  We introduce a novel framework that decouples sampling from optimization for better convergence and improves signal quality.<n>On CIFAR-10, our method achieves a textbf10.0% improvement with 50 images per class and textbf8.3% increase with just textbfone-fifth the distilled set size of previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T13:15:52Z)
• Context-Aware Online Conformal Anomaly Detection with Prediction-Powered Data Acquisition [35.59201763567714]
  We introduce context-aware prediction-powered conformal online anomaly detection (C-PP-COAD)<n>Our framework strategically leverages synthetic calibration data to mitigate data scarcity, while adaptively integrating real data based on contextual cues.<n>Experiments conducted on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that C-PP-COAD significantly reduces dependency on real calibration data without compromising guaranteed false discovery rate (FDR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T10:58:05Z)
• VAE-based Feature Disentanglement for Data Augmentation and Compression in Generalized GNSS Interference Classification [42.14439854721613]
  We propose variational autoencoders (VAEs) for disentanglement to extract essential latent features that enable accurate classification of interferences.<n>Our proposed VAE achieves a data compression rate ranging from 512 to 8,192 and achieves an accuracy up to 99.92%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T13:38:00Z)
• Dataset Protection via Watermarked Canaries in Retrieval-Augmented LLMs [67.0310240737424]
  We introduce a novel approach to safeguard the ownership of text datasets and effectively detect unauthorized use by the RA-LLMs.<n>Our approach preserves the original data completely unchanged while protecting it by inserting specifically designed canary documents into the IP dataset.<n>During the detection process, unauthorized usage is identified by querying the canary documents and analyzing the responses of RA-LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T04:56:45Z)
• Communication-Efficient and Privacy-Adaptable Mechanism for Federated Learning [54.20871516148981]
  We introduce the Communication-Efficient and Privacy-Adaptable Mechanism (CEPAM)<n>CEPAM achieves communication efficiency and privacy protection simultaneously.<n>We theoretically analyze the privacy guarantee of CEPAM and investigate the trade-offs among user privacy and accuracy of CEPAM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T11:16:05Z)
• SafeSynthDP: Leveraging Large Language Models for Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation Using Differential Privacy [0.0]
  We investigate capability of Large Language Models (Ms) to generate synthetic datasets with Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms.<n>Our approach incorporates DP-based noise injection methods, including Laplace and Gaussian distributions, into the data generation process.<n>We then evaluate the utility of these DP-enhanced synthetic datasets by comparing the performance of ML models trained on them against models trained on the original data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T01:10:10Z)
• PAC-Based Formal Verification for Out-of-Distribution Data Detection [4.406331747636832]
  This study places probably approximately correct (PAC) based guarantees on OOD detection using the encoding process within VAEs. It is used to bound the detection error on unfamiliar instances with user-defined confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T07:33:02Z)
• Cluster-level pseudo-labelling for source-free cross-domain facial expression recognition [94.56304526014875]
  We propose the first Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (SFUDA) method for Facial Expression Recognition (FER) Our method exploits self-supervised pretraining to learn good feature representations from the target data. We validate the effectiveness of our method in four adaptation setups, proving that it consistently outperforms existing SFUDA methods when applied to FER.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T08:24:50Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
• Privacy Preservation in Federated Learning: An insightful survey from the GDPR Perspective [10.901568085406753]
  Article is dedicated to surveying on the state-of-the-art privacy techniques, which can be employed in Federated learning. Recent research has demonstrated that retaining data and on computation in FL is not enough for privacy-guarantee. This is because ML model parameters exchanged between parties in an FL system, which can be exploited in some privacy attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-10T21:41:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.