Maintaining the Heterogeneity in the Organization of Software Engineering Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03093v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 04:34:59 GMT
• Title: Maintaining the Heterogeneity in the Organization of Software Engineering Research
• Authors: Yang Yue, Zheng Jiang, Yi Wang,
• Abstract summary: The funded research model is becoming dominant in software engineering research.<n>The choice is at our hands, and we urge our community to seriously consider maintaining the heterogeneity in the organization of software engineering research.
• Score: 8.527400683178472
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The heterogeneity in the organization of software engineering (SE) research historically exists, i.e., funded research model and hands-on model, which makes software engineering become a thriving interdisciplinary field in the last 50 years. However, the funded research model is becoming dominant in SE research recently, indicating such heterogeneity has been seriously and systematically threatened. In this essay, we first explain why the heterogeneity is needed in the organization of SE research, then present the current trend of SE research nowadays, as well as the consequences and potential futures. The choice is at our hands, and we urge our community to seriously consider maintaining the heterogeneity in the organization of software engineering research.

Related papers

• From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery [108.1082357960201]
  Agentic AI shows capabilities in hypothesis generation, experimental design, execution, analysis, and iterative refinement.<n>This survey provides a domain-oriented review of autonomous scientific discovery across life sciences, chemistry, materials science, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T05:25:54Z)
• AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
  We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z)
• From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [67.07598263346591]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are catalyzing a paradigm shift in scientific discovery.<n>This survey systematically charts this burgeoning field, placing a central focus on the changing roles and escalating capabilities of LLMs in science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T15:41:32Z)
• Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shift [9.284024538100063]
  This vision paper examines how the integration of large language models into software engineering disrupts established research paradigms.<n>We discuss how it transforms the phenomena we study, the methods and theories we rely on, the data we analyze, and the threats to validity that arise in dynamic AI-mediated environments.<n>Our aim is to help the empirical software engineering community adapt its questions, instruments, and validation standards to a future in which AI systems are not merely tools, but active collaborators shaping software engineering and its study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T04:13:07Z)
• Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
  A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
• Articulation Work and Tinkering for Fairness in Machine Learning [5.4773558295476885]
  We study the tension between computer science and interdisciplinary (SOI) research in the field of fair AI. We analyze the tasks, resources, and actors required for doable research in the case of fair AI. We find that CS researchers engage with SOI research to some extent, but organizational conditions, articulation work, and ambiguities of the social world constrain the doability of SOI research for them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T14:11:12Z)
• Making Software Development More Diverse and Inclusive: Key Themes, Challenges, and Future Directions [50.545824691484796]
  We identify six themes around the theme challenges and opportunities to improve Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion (SDDI)<n>We identify benefits, harms, and future research directions for the four main themes.<n>We discuss the remaining two themes, Artificial Intelligence & SDDI and AI & Computer Science education, which have a cross-cutting effect on the other themes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z)
• Looking back and forward: A retrospective and future directions on Software Engineering for systems-of-systems [0.11470070927586014]
  The textitInternational Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (SESoS) series started in 2013 to fill a gap in scientific forums addressing SoS from the Software Engineering perspective. This article presents a study aimed at outlining the evolution and future trajectory of Software Engineering for SoS based on the examination of 57 papers spanning the 11 editions of the SESoS workshop (2013-2023).
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T13:12:39Z)
• Data Science for Social Good [2.8621556092850065]
  We present a framework for "data science for social good" (DSSG) research. We perform an analysis of the literature to empirically demonstrate the paucity of work on DSSG in information systems. We hope that this article and the special issue will spur future DSSG research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T15:40:20Z)
• Open Problems in DAOs [12.007226344585092]
  Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are a new, rapidly-growing class of organizations governed by contracts. We describe how researchers can contribute to the emerging science of smart-constituted organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T23:48:45Z)
• Recommendations for Systematic Research on Emergent Language [1.52292571922932]
  We identify the overarching goals of emergent language research, categorizing them as either science or engineering. We present core methodological elements of science and engineering, analyze their role in current emergent language research, and recommend how to apply these elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T18:10:44Z)
• Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
  Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines. We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA. FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.