Articulation Work and Tinkering for Fairness in Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16496v2
• Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:20:42 GMT
• Title: Articulation Work and Tinkering for Fairness in Machine Learning
• Authors: Miriam Fahimi, Mayra Russo, Kristen M. Scott, Maria-Esther Vidal, Bettina Berendt, Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda,
• Abstract summary: We study the tension between computer science and interdisciplinary (SOI) research in the field of fair AI. We analyze the tasks, resources, and actors required for doable research in the case of fair AI. We find that CS researchers engage with SOI research to some extent, but organizational conditions, articulation work, and ambiguities of the social world constrain the doability of SOI research for them.
• Score: 5.4773558295476885
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The field of fair AI aims to counter biased algorithms through computational modelling. However, it faces increasing criticism for perpetuating the use of overly technical and reductionist methods. As a result, novel approaches appear in the field to address more socially-oriented and interdisciplinary (SOI) perspectives on fair AI. In this paper, we take this dynamic as the starting point to study the tension between computer science (CS) and SOI research. By drawing on STS and CSCW theory, we position fair AI research as a matter of 'organizational alignment': what makes research 'doable' is the successful alignment of three levels of work organization (the social world, the laboratory, and the experiment). Based on qualitative interviews with CS researchers, we analyze the tasks, resources, and actors required for doable research in the case of fair AI. We find that CS researchers engage with SOI research to some extent, but organizational conditions, articulation work, and ambiguities of the social world constrain the doability of SOI research for them. Based on our findings, we identify and discuss problems for aligning CS and SOI as fair AI continues to evolve.

Related papers

• Artificial Intelligence and Accounting Research: A Framework and Agenda [0.0]
  generative AI (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs) are transforming accounting research.<n>This paper proposes a framework that classifies AI-accounting research along two dimensions: research focus and methodological approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T05:18:39Z)
• Rethinking Science in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  We argue that AI must augment but not replace human judgment in academic academic such as peer review, ethical evaluation, and validation.<n>This paper calls for the deliberate adoption of AI within the scientific practice through policies that promote transparency, validation, and accountability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T17:26:00Z)
• Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Research [58.95406995634148]
  We argue that systems research, long focused on designing and evaluating new performance-oriented algorithms, is particularly well-suited for AI-driven solution discovery.<n>We term this approach as AI-Driven Research for Systems ( ADRS), which iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines solutions.<n>Our results highlight both the disruptive potential and the urgent need to adapt systems research practices in the age of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T17:49:24Z)
• AI, Humans, and Data Science: Optimizing Roles Across Workflows and the Workforce [0.0]
  We consider the potential and limitation of analytic, generative, and agentic AI to augment data scientists or take on tasks traditionally done by human analysts and researchers.<n>Just as earlier eras of survey analysis created issues when the increased ease of using statistical software allowed researchers to conduct analyses they did not fully understand, the new AI tools may create similar but larger risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T17:59:06Z)
• Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research [2.2665233748698355]
  We present a community-centric study drawing on 284 survey responses and 15 semi-structured interviews with social scientists.<n>We find that the use of AI in research settings has increased significantly among social scientists in step with the widespread popularity of generative AI (genAI)<n>Ethical concerns, particularly around automation bias, deskilling, research misconduct, complex interpretability, and representational harm, are raised in relation to genAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T19:55:36Z)
• Societal AI Research Has Become Less Interdisciplinary [3.9599054392856483]
  This study analyzes over 100,000 AI-related papers published on ArXiv between 2014 and 2024.<n>Computer science-only teams now account for a growing share of the field's overall societal output.<n>These findings challenge common assumptions about the drivers of societal AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T12:34:53Z)
• Towards the Terminator Economy: Assessing Job Exposure to AI through LLMs [10.844598404826355]
  One-third of U.S. employment is highly exposed to AI, primarily in high-skill jobs requiring a graduate or postgraduate level of education. Even in high-skill occupations, AI exhibits high variability in task substitution, suggesting that AI and humans complement each other within the same occupation. All results, models, and code are freely available online to allow the community to reproduce our results, compare outcomes, and use our work as a benchmark to monitor AI's progress over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T08:14:18Z)
• Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions [101.67121669727354]
  Recent advancements in AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment. The lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment. We introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
  Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
• On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades. The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness. To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z)
• Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-based AI for Self-determination [1.4305544869388402]
  Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have emerged as fundamental platforms for powering intelligent decision-making. The integration of KGs with neuronal learning is currently a topic of active research. This paper conceptualises the foundational topics and research pillars to support KG-based AI for self-determination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T12:51:52Z)
• The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices [2.28438857884398]
  This study explores how, and to what extent, comparable research ethics requirements and norms have developed for AI research and data enrichment. Leading AI venues have begun to establish protocols for human data collection, but these are are inconsistently followed by authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T16:12:55Z)
• Coordinated Science Laboratory 70th Anniversary Symposium: The Future of Computing [80.72844751804166]
  In 2021, the Coordinated Science Laboratory CSL hosted the Future of Computing Symposium to celebrate its 70th anniversary. We summarize the major technological points, insights, and directions that speakers brought forward during the symposium. Participants discussed topics related to new computing paradigms, technologies, algorithms, behaviors, and research challenges to be expected in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T17:32:27Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challenges [31.382000425295885]
  Technologists and AI researchers have a responsibility to develop trustworthy AI systems. To build long-lasting trust between AI and human beings, we argue that the key is to think beyond algorithmic fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-01T17:34:42Z)
• A narrowing of AI research? [0.0]
  We study the evolution of the thematic diversity of AI research in academia and the private sector. We measure the influence of private companies in AI research through the citations they receive and their collaborations with other institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T08:23:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.