Modelling the Morphology of Verbal Paradigms: A Case Study in the Tokenization of Turkish and Hebrew

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05648v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 13:31:21 GMT
• Title: Modelling the Morphology of Verbal Paradigms: A Case Study in the Tokenization of Turkish and Hebrew
• Authors: Giuseppe Samo, Paola Merlo,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how transformer models represent complex verb paradigms in Turkish and Modern Hebrew.<n>We show that for Turkish, both monolingual and multilingual models succeed, either when tokenization is atomic or when it breaks words into small subword units.<n>For Hebrew, instead, monolingual and multilingual models diverge.
• Score: 1.0857263744676489
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigate how transformer models represent complex verb paradigms in Turkish and Modern Hebrew, concentrating on how tokenization strategies shape this ability. Using the Blackbird Language Matrices task on natural data, we show that for Turkish -- with its transparent morphological markers -- both monolingual and multilingual models succeed, either when tokenization is atomic or when it breaks words into small subword units. For Hebrew, instead, monolingual and multilingual models diverge. A multilingual model using character-level tokenization fails to capture the language non-concatenative morphology, but a monolingual model with morpheme-aware segmentation performs well. Performance improves on more synthetic datasets, in all models.

Related papers

• Beyond Subtokens: A Rich Character Embedding for Low-resource and Morphologically Complex Languages [5.338837380875301]
  Tokenization and sub-tokenization based models like word2vec, BERT and the GPTs are the state-of-the-art in natural language processing.<n>We propose to compute word vectors directly from character strings, integrating both semantic and syntactic information.<n>It has the potential to improve performance for both large context-based language models like BERT and small models like word2vec for under-resourced and morphologically rich languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T21:16:08Z)
• False Friends Are Not Foes: Investigating Vocabulary Overlap in Multilingual Language Models [53.01170039144264]
  Subword tokenizers trained on multilingual corpora naturally produce overlapping tokens across languages.<n>Does token overlap facilitate cross-lingual transfer or instead introduce interference between languages?<n>We find that models with overlap outperform models with disjoint vocabularies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T07:47:54Z)
• Tokenization and Morphology in Multilingual Language Models: A Comparative Analysis of mT5 and ByT5 [4.779196219827507]
  We capture the impact of tokenization by contrasting two multilingual language models: mT5 and ByT5. Probing the morphological knowledge encoded in these models on four tasks and 17 languages, our analyses show that the models learn the morphological systems of some languages better than others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T14:14:19Z)
• The Less the Merrier? Investigating Language Representation in Multilingual Models [8.632506864465501]
  We investigate the linguistic representation of different languages in multilingual models. We observe from our experiments that community-centered models perform better at distinguishing between languages in the same family for low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T02:26:34Z)
• Tik-to-Tok: Translating Language Models One Token at a Time: An Embedding Initialization Strategy for Efficient Language Adaptation [19.624330093598996]
  Training monolingual language models for low and mid-resource languages is made challenging by limited and often inadequate pretraining data. By generalizing over a word translation dictionary encompassing both the source and target languages, we map tokens from the target tokenizer to semantically similar tokens from the source language tokenizer. We conduct experiments to convert high-resource models to mid- and low-resource languages, namely Dutch and Frisian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T11:45:29Z)
• Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Neurons in Multilingual Language Models [28.036233760742125]
  We causally probe multilingual language models (XGLM and multilingual BERT) across various languages. We find significant neuron overlap across languages in autoregressive multilingual language models, but not masked language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T20:43:36Z)
• Discovering Representation Sprachbund For Multilingual Pre-Training [139.05668687865688]
  We generate language representation from multilingual pre-trained models and conduct linguistic analysis. We cluster all the target languages into multiple groups and name each group as a representation sprachbund. Experiments are conducted on cross-lingual benchmarks and significant improvements are achieved compared to strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T09:32:06Z)
• Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parsers [73.50960967598654]
  We explore the use of large pretrained language models as few-shot semantics. The goal in semantic parsing is to generate a structured meaning representation given a natural language input. We use language models to paraphrase inputs into a controlled sublanguage resembling English that can be automatically mapped to a target meaning representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T08:13:06Z)
• Are Multilingual Models Effective in Code-Switching? [57.78477547424949]
  We study the effectiveness of multilingual language models to understand their capability and adaptability to the mixed-language setting. Our findings suggest that pre-trained multilingual models do not necessarily guarantee high-quality representations on code-switching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T16:20:02Z)
• How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Models [96.32118305166412]
  We study a set of nine typologically diverse languages with readily available pretrained monolingual models on a set of five diverse monolingual downstream tasks. We find that languages which are adequately represented in the multilingual model's vocabulary exhibit negligible performance decreases over their monolingual counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-31T14:11:00Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.