DeDPO: Debiased Direct Preference Optimization for Diffusion Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06195v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 21:11:00 GMT
• Title: DeDPO: Debiased Direct Preference Optimization for Diffusion Models
• Authors: Khiem Pham, Quang Nguyen, Tung Nguyen, Jingsen Zhu, Michele Santacatterina, Dimitris Metaxas, Ramin Zabih,
• Abstract summary: We propose a semi-supervised framework augmenting limited human data with a large corpus of unlabeled pairs annotated via cost-effective synthetic AI feedback.<n>Our paper introduces Debiased DPO (DeDPO), which uniquely integrates a debiased estimation technique from causal inference into the DPO objective.<n> Experiments demonstrate that DeDPO is robust to the variations in synthetic labeling methods, achieving performance that matches and occasionally exceeds the theoretical upper bound of models trained on fully human-labeled data.
• Score: 13.068043495097378
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a predominant alignment method for diffusion models, facilitating off-policy training without explicit reward modeling. However, its reliance on large-scale, high-quality human preference labels presents a severe cost and scalability bottleneck. To overcome this, We propose a semi-supervised framework augmenting limited human data with a large corpus of unlabeled pairs annotated via cost-effective synthetic AI feedback. Our paper introduces Debiased DPO (DeDPO), which uniquely integrates a debiased estimation technique from causal inference into the DPO objective. By explicitly identifying and correcting the systematic bias and noise inherent in synthetic annotators, DeDPO ensures robust learning from imperfect feedback sources, including self-training and Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Experiments demonstrate that DeDPO is robust to the variations in synthetic labeling methods, achieving performance that matches and occasionally exceeds the theoretical upper bound of models trained on fully human-labeled data. This establishes DeDPO as a scalable solution for human-AI alignment using inexpensive synthetic supervision.

Related papers

• A Statistical Framework for Alignment with Biased AI Feedback [20.653424560119554]
  AI labels can be systematically biased compared to high-quality human feedback datasets.<n>We develop two debiased alignment methods that accommodate heterogeneous prompt-response distributions and external human feedback sources.<n> Empirical studies on sentiment generation, summarization, and single-turn dialogue demonstrate that the proposed methods substantially improve alignment efficiency and recover performance close to that of an oracle trained on fully human-labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T04:37:10Z)
• Self-NPO: Negative Preference Optimization of Diffusion Models by Simply Learning from Itself without Explicit Preference Annotations [60.143658714894336]
  Diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable success in various visual generation tasks, including image, video, and 3D content generation.<n> Preference optimization (PO) is a prominent and growing area of research that aims to align these models with human preferences.<n>We introduce Self-NPO, a Negative Preference Optimization approach that learns exclusively from the model itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T01:03:46Z)
• A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization [103.59317151002693]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated unprecedented generative capabilities.<n>Their alignment with human values remains critical for ensuring helpful and harmless deployments.<n>Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently gained prominence as a streamlined alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T08:45:15Z)
• Uncertainty-Penalized Direct Preference Optimization [52.387088396044206]
  We develop a pessimistic framework for DPO by introducing preference uncertainty penalization schemes. The penalization serves as a correction to the loss which attenuates the loss gradient for uncertain samples. We show improved overall performance compared to vanilla DPO, as well as better completions on prompts from high-uncertainty chosen/rejected responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T14:24:37Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC.<n>We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications.<n>We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• The Hitchhiker's Guide to Human Alignment with *PO [43.4130314879284]
  We focus on identifying the algorithm that, while being performant, is simultaneously more robust to varying hyper parameters. Our analysis reveals that the widely adopted DPO method consistently produces lengthy responses of inferior quality. Motivated by these findings, we propose an embarrassingly simple extension to the DPO algorithm, LN-DPO, resulting in more concise responses without sacrificing quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T17:35:20Z)
• Towards Robust Alignment of Language Models: Distributionally Robustifying Direct Preference Optimization [45.6430987775264]
  This study addresses the challenge of noise in training datasets for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)<n>We categorize noise into pointwise noise, which includes low-quality data points, and pairwise noise, which encompasses erroneous data pair associations.<n>We introduce Distributionally Robustifying DPO, which integrates pairwise robustness by optimizing against worst-case pairwise scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T17:48:25Z)
• RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Models [7.676477609461592]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has been extensively employed to align large language models with user intent. DPO relies on contrastive responses generated from human annotator and alternative LLM, instead of the policy model. In this paper, we address both challenges by systematically combining sampling rejection (RS) and DPO. Our proposed method effectively fine-tunes LLMs with limited resource environments, leading to improved alignment with user intent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T16:00:58Z)
• Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization [103.2238655827797]
  Diffusion-DPO is a method to align diffusion models to human preferences by directly optimizing on human comparison data. We fine-tune the base model of the state-of-the-art Stable Diffusion XL (SDXL)-1.0 model with Diffusion-DPO. We also develop a variant that uses AI feedback and has comparable performance to training on human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T15:24:05Z)
• Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignment [80.96507425217472]
  We propose a novel algorithm for aligning large language models to human preferences. We show that it consistently outperforms PPO in language tasks by a large margin. We also provide a theoretical justification supporting the design of our loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T01:59:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.