Trust-Based Incentive Mechanisms in Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08290v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 05:47:51 GMT
• Title: Trust-Based Incentive Mechanisms in Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning Systems
• Authors: Ajay Kumar Shrestha,
• Abstract summary: In federated learning (FL), decentralized model training allows multi-ple participants to collaboratively improve a shared machine learning model without exchanging raw data.<n>This paper proposes a novel trust-based incentive mechanism designed to evaluate and reward the quality of contributions in FL systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In federated learning (FL), decentralized model training allows multi-ple participants to collaboratively improve a shared machine learning model without exchanging raw data. However, ensuring the integrity and reliability of the system is challenging due to the presence of potentially malicious or faulty nodes that can degrade the model's performance. This paper proposes a novel trust-based incentive mechanism designed to evaluate and reward the quality of contributions in FL systems. By dynamically assessing trust scores based on fac-tors such as data quality, model accuracy, consistency, and contribution fre-quency, the system encourages honest participation and penalizes unreliable or malicious behavior. These trust scores form the basis of an incentive mechanism that rewards high-trust nodes with greater participation opportunities and penal-ties for low-trust participants. We further explore the integration of blockchain technology and smart contracts to automate the trust evaluation and incentive distribution processes, ensuring transparency and decentralization. Our proposed theoretical framework aims to create a more robust, fair, and transparent FL eco-system, reducing the risks posed by untrustworthy participants.

Related papers

• Toward a Sustainable Federated Learning Ecosystem: A Practical Least Core Mechanism for Payoff Allocation [71.86087908416255]
  We introduce a payoff allocation framework based on the least core (LC) concept.<n>Unlike traditional methods, the LC prioritizes the cohesion of the federation by minimizing the maximum dissatisfaction.<n>Case studies in federated intrusion detection demonstrate that our mechanism correctly identifies pivotal contributors and strategic alliances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:10:50Z)
• Mind the Generation Process: Fine-Grained Confidence Estimation During LLM Generation [63.49409574310576]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit overconfidence, assigning high confidence scores to incorrect predictions.<n>We introduce FineCE, a novel confidence estimation method that delivers accurate, fine-grained confidence scores during text generation.<n>Our code and all baselines used in the paper are available on GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T13:29:35Z)
• Zero-Trust Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Secure and Collaborative Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things [61.43014629640404]
  Zero-Trust Foundation Models (ZTFMs) embed zero-trust security principles into the lifecycle of foundation models (FMs) for Internet of Things (IoT) systems.<n>ZTFMs can enable secure, privacy-preserving AI across distributed, heterogeneous, and potentially adversarial IoT environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T06:44:31Z)
• A Weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Driven Trusted Multiple Large Language Models Network [53.37983409425452]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of applications.<n>Recently, collaborative frameworks such as the Multi-LLM Network (MultiLLMN) have been introduced.<n>We propose a novel Trusted MultiLLMN framework driven by a weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance (WBFT) blockchain consensus mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T10:04:41Z)
• Blockchain-based Framework for Scalable and Incentivized Federated Learning [0.820828081284034]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without sharing raw data, preserving privacy while harnessing distributed datasets.<n>Traditional FL systems often rely on centralized aggregating mechanisms, introducing trust issues, single points of failure, and limited mechanisms for incentivizing meaningful client contributions.<n>This paper presents a blockchain-based FL framework that addresses these limitations by integrating smart contracts and a novel hybrid incentive mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T00:38:35Z)
• Proof-of-Data: A Consensus Protocol for Collaborative Intelligence [4.362312381717716]
  We propose a blockchain-based Byzantine fault-tolerant federated learning framework based on a novel Proof-of-Data (PoD) consensus protocol.<n>PoD is able to enjoy the benefit of learning efficiency and system liveliness from societal-scale PoW-style learning.<n>To mitigate false reward claims by data forgery from Byzantine attacks, a privacy-aware data verification and contribution-based reward allocation mechanism is designed to complete the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T12:27:59Z)
• Blockchain-Empowered Cyber-Secure Federated Learning for Trustworthy Edge Computing [0.36700088931938835]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed machine learning scheme.<n>The FL paradigm may become vulnerable due to an active attack from the network participants, called a poisonous attack.<n>This paper presents a cross-device FL model that ensures trustworthiness, fairness, and authenticity in the underlying FL training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T02:58:18Z)
• Protocol Learning, Decentralized Frontier Risk and the No-Off Problem [56.74434512241989]
  We identify a third paradigm - Protocol Learning - where models are trained across decentralized networks of incentivized participants.<n>This approach has the potential to aggregate orders of magnitude more computational resources than any single centralized entity.<n>It also introduces novel challenges: heterogeneous and unreliable nodes, malicious participants, the need for unextractable models to preserve incentives, and complex governance dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T19:53:50Z)
• Securing Federated Learning with Control-Flow Attestation: A Novel Framework for Enhanced Integrity and Resilience against Adversarial Attacks [2.28438857884398]
  Federated Learning (FL) as a distributed machine learning paradigm has introduced new cybersecurity challenges. This study proposes an innovative security framework inspired by Control-Flow (CFA) mechanisms, traditionally used in cybersecurity. We authenticate and verify the integrity of model updates across the network, effectively mitigating risks associated with model poisoning and adversarial interference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T04:03:34Z)
• Enhancing Scalability and Reliability in Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning With Blockchain: Trust Penalization and Asynchronous Functionality [0.0]
  The paper focuses on enhancing the trustworthiness of participating nodes through a trust penalization mechanism. The proposed system aims to create a fair, secure and transparent environment for collaborative machine learning without compromising data privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T06:05:50Z)
• Reliable Federated Disentangling Network for Non-IID Domain Feature [62.73267904147804]
  In this paper, we propose a novel reliable federated disentangling network, termed RFedDis. To the best of our knowledge, our proposed RFedDis is the first work to develop an FL approach based on evidential uncertainty combined with feature disentangling. Our proposed RFedDis provides outstanding performance with a high degree of reliability as compared to other state-of-the-art FL approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T11:46:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.