Equity by Design: Fairness-Driven Recommendation in Heterogeneous Two-Sided Markets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10739v2
• Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 18:47:28 GMT
• Title: Equity by Design: Fairness-Driven Recommendation in Heterogeneous Two-Sided Markets
• Authors: Dominykas Seputis, Alexander Timans, Rajeev Verma,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Conditional Value-at-Risk as a consumer-side objective that compresses group-level utility disparities.<n>Our experiments reveal that the "free fairness" regime, where producer constraints impose no consumer cost, disappears in multi item settings.<n>Strikingly, moderate fairness constraints can improve business metrics by diversifying exposure away from saturated producers.
• Score: 44.675845572303324
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Two-sided marketplaces embody heterogeneity in incentives: producers seek exposure while consumers seek relevance, and balancing these competing objectives through constrained optimization is now a standard practice. Yet real platforms face finer-grained complexity: consumers differ in preferences and engagement patterns, producers vary in catalog value and capacity, and business objectives impose additional constraints beyond raw relevance. We formalize two-sided fairness under these realistic conditions, extending prior work from soft single-item allocations to discrete multi-item recommendations. We introduce Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) as a consumer-side objective that compresses group-level utility disparities, and integrate business constraints directly into the optimization. Our experiments reveal that the "free fairness" regime, where producer constraints impose no consumer cost, disappears in multi item settings. Strikingly, moderate fairness constraints can improve business metrics by diversifying exposure away from saturated producers. Scalable solvers match exact solutions at a fraction of the runtime, making fairness-aware allocation practical at scale. These findings reframe fairness not as a tax on platform efficiency but as a lever for sustainable marketplace health.

Related papers

• Fairness Aware Reward Optimization [78.85867531002346]
  We introduce Fairness Aware Reward Optimization (Faro), an in-processing framework that trains reward models under demographic parity, equalized odds, or counterfactual fairness constraints.<n>We provide the first theoretical analysis of reward-level fairness in LLM alignment.<n>Faro significantly reduces bias and harmful generations while maintaining or improving model quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T03:35:49Z)
• Fairness-Aware Insurance Pricing: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach [1.529342790344802]
  Machine learning improves predictive accuracy in insurance pricing but exacerbates trade-offs between competing fairness criteria across different discrimination measures.<n>We propose a novel multi-objective optimization framework that jointly optimize all four criteria via the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II)<n>Our results show that XGBoost outperforms GLM in accuracy but amplifies fairness disparities; the Orthogonal model excels in group fairness, while Synthetic Control leads in individual and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T09:42:03Z)
• Producer-Fairness in Sequential Bundle Recommendation [62.22091013241362]
  We formalize producer-fairness, that seeks to achieve desired exposure of different item groups across users in a recommendation session.<n>We propose an exact solution that caters to small instances of our problem.<n>We then examine twos, quality-first and fairness-first, and an adaptive variant that determines on-the-fly the right balance between bundle fairness and quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T11:24:52Z)
• OptiGrad: A Fair and more Efficient Price Elasticity Optimization via a Gradient Based Learning [7.145413681946911]
  This paper presents a novel approach to optimizing profit margins in non-life insurance markets through a gradient descent-based method. It targets three key objectives: 1) maximizing profit margins, 2) ensuring conversion rates, and 3) enforcing fairness criteria such as demographic parity (DP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T04:21:59Z)
• Bidding Strategies for Proportional Representation in Advertisement Campaigns [8.269283912626873]
  We show that equitable bidding may not result in equitable outcomes due to heterogeneous levels of competition for different types of individuals. We consider alterations that make no change to the platform mechanism and instead change the bidding strategies used by advertisers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T23:29:05Z)
• DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
  This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations. Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z)
• Regulatory Instruments for Fair Personalized Pricing [34.986747852934634]
  We investigate the optimal pricing strategy of a profit-maximizing monopoly under both regulatory constraints and the impact of imposing them on consumer surplus, producer surplus, and social welfare. Our findings and insights shed light on regulatory policy design for the increasingly monopolized business in the digital era.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T03:07:08Z)
• Fairness, Welfare, and Equity in Personalized Pricing [88.9134799076718]
  We study the interplay of fairness, welfare, and equity considerations in personalized pricing based on customer features. We show the potential benefits of personalized pricing in two settings: pricing subsidies for an elective vaccine, and the effects of personalized interest rates on downstream outcomes in microcredit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T01:01:56Z)
• Beyond Individual and Group Fairness [90.4666341812857]
  We present a new data-driven model of fairness that is guided by the unfairness complaints received by the system. Our model supports multiple fairness criteria and takes into account their potential incompatibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T14:14:44Z)
• FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platforms [36.35034531426411]
  We investigate the problem of fair recommendation in the context of two-sided online platforms. Our approach involves a novel mapping of the fair recommendation problem to a constrained version of the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods. Our proposed FairRec algorithm guarantees at least Maximin Share (MMS) of exposure for most of the producers and Envy-Free up to One item (EF1) fairness for every customer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T09:43:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.