Security Threat Modeling for Emerging AI-Agent Protocols: A Comparative Analysis of MCP, A2A, Agora, and ANP

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11327v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 19:58:23 GMT
• Title: Security Threat Modeling for Emerging AI-Agent Protocols: A Comparative Analysis of MCP, A2A, Agora, and ANP
• Authors: Zeynab Anbiaee, Mahdi Rabbani, Mansur Mirani, Gunjan Piya, Igor Opushnyev, Ali Ghorbani, Sajjad Dadkhah,
• Abstract summary: Model Context Protocol (MCP), Agent2Agent (A2A), Agora, and Agent Network Protocol (ANP) are emerging AI agent communication protocols.<n>This paper presents a systematic security analysis of four emerging AI agent communication protocols.
• Score: 0.14239589514817486
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid development of the AI agent communication protocols, including the Model Context Protocol (MCP), Agent2Agent (A2A), Agora, and Agent Network Protocol (ANP), is reshaping how AI agents communicate with tools, services, and each other. While these protocols support scalable multi-agent interaction and cross-organizational interoperability, their security principles remain understudied, and standardized threat modeling is limited; no protocol-centric risk assessment framework has been established yet. This paper presents a systematic security analysis of four emerging AI agent communication protocols. First, we develop a structured threat modeling analysis that examines protocol architectures, trust assumptions, interaction patterns, and lifecycle behaviors to identify protocol-specific and cross-protocol risk surfaces. Second, we introduce a qualitative risk assessment framework that identifies twelve protocol-level risks and evaluates security posture across the creation, operation, and update phases through systematic assessment of likelihood, impact, and overall protocol risk, with implications for secure deployment and future standardization. Third, we provide a measurement-driven case study on MCP that formalizes the risk of missing mandatory validation/attestation for executable components as a falsifiable security claim by quantifying wrong-provider tool execution under multi-server composition across representative resolver policies. Collectively, our results highlight key design-induced risk surfaces and provide actionable guidance for secure deployment and future standardization of agent communication ecosystems.

Related papers

• SMCP: Secure Model Context Protocol [12.950842281962101]
  We introduce the Secure Model Context Protocol (SMCP), which builds on the Model Context Protocol (MCP)<n>MCP has emerged as a standard to unify tool access, allowing agents to discover, invoke, and coordinate with tools more flexibly.<n>SMCP adds unified identity management, robust mutual authentication, ongoing security context propagation, fine-grained policy enforcement, and comprehensive audit logging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T09:59:57Z)
• ORCA -- An Automated Threat Analysis Pipeline for O-RAN Continuous Development [57.61878484176942]
  Open-Radio Access Network (O-RAN) integrates numerous software components in a cloud-like deployment, opening the radio access network to previously unconsidered security threats.<n>Current vulnerability assessment practices often rely on manual, labor-intensive, and subjective investigations, leading to inconsistencies in the threat analysis.<n>We propose an automated pipeline that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) to minimize human intervention and associated biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T07:31:59Z)
• Systematization of Knowledge: Security and Safety in the Model Context Protocol Ecosystem [0.0]
  The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as the de facto standard for connecting Large Language Models to external data and tools.<n>This paper provides a taxonomy of risks in the MCP ecosystem, distinguishing between adversarial security threats and safety hazards.<n>We demonstrate how "context" can be weaponized to trigger unauthorized operations in multi-agent environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T06:39:21Z)
• Towards Unifying Quantitative Security Benchmarking for Multi Agent Systems [0.0]
  Evolving AI systems increasingly deploy multi-agent architectures where autonomous agents collaborate, share information, and delegate tasks through developing protocols.<n>One such risk is a cascading risk: a breach in one agent can cascade through the system, compromising others by exploiting inter-agent trust.<n>In an ACI attack, a malicious input or tool exploit injected at one agent leads to cascading compromises and amplified downstream effects across agents that trust its outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T13:51:28Z)
• SafeMobile: Chain-level Jailbreak Detection and Automated Evaluation for Multimodal Mobile Agents [58.21223208538351]
  This work explores the security issues surrounding mobile multimodal agents.<n>It attempts to construct a risk discrimination mechanism by incorporating behavioral sequence information.<n>It also designs an automated assisted assessment scheme based on a large language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T15:10:00Z)
• From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows [1.202155693533555]
  Large language models (LLMs) with structured function-calling interfaces have dramatically expanded capabilities for real-time data retrieval and computation.<n>Yet, the explosive proliferation of plugins, connectors, and inter-agent protocols has outpaced discovery mechanisms and security practices.<n>We introduce the first unified, end-to-end threat model for LLM-agent ecosystems, spanning host-to-tool and agent-to-agent communications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T14:32:32Z)
• A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasures [59.43633341497526]
  Large-Language-Model-driven AI agents have exhibited unprecedented intelligence and adaptability.<n>Agent communication is regarded as a foundational pillar of the future AI ecosystem.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey of agent communication security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T14:44:28Z)
• AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructions [64.85086226439954]
  We present SAFE, a benchmark for assessing the safety of embodied VLM agents on hazardous instructions.<n> SAFE comprises three components: SAFE-THOR, SAFE-VERSE, and SAFE-DIAGNOSE.<n>We uncover systematic failures in translating hazard recognition into safe planning and execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T16:37:35Z)
• Agent Capability Negotiation and Binding Protocol (ACNBP) [0.0]
  This paper presents the Agent Capability Negotiation and Binding Protocol (ACNBP)<n>ACNBP is a framework designed to facilitate secure, efficient, and verifiable interactions between agents in heterogeneous multi-agent systems.<n>We show ACNBP's effectiveness through a comprehensive security analysis using the MAESTRO threat modeling framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T15:18:24Z)
• MCIP: Protecting MCP Safety via Model Contextual Integrity Protocol [47.98229326363512]
  This paper proposes a novel framework to enhance Model Context Protocol safety.<n>Based on the MAESTRO framework, we first analyze the missing safety mechanisms in MCP.<n>Next, we develop a fine-grained taxonomy that captures a diverse range of unsafe behaviors observed in MCP scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:41:45Z)
• A Survey and Comparative Analysis of Security Properties of CAN Authentication Protocols [92.81385447582882]
  The Controller Area Network (CAN) bus leaves in-vehicle communications inherently non-secure. This paper reviews and compares the 15 most prominent authentication protocols for the CAN bus. We evaluate protocols based on essential operational criteria that contribute to ease of implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T14:52:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.