Bizarre Love Triangle: Generative AI, Art, and Kitsch
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11353v3
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:45:55 GMT
- Title: Bizarre Love Triangle: Generative AI, Art, and Kitsch
- Abstract summary: I review five types of kitsch-engendering expressive flaws in AI art.<n>I discuss the normalization of these blunders through GenAI art's good standing within the art world.<n>I emphasize that recognizing different facets of artists' uncritical embrace of techno-cultural trends is crucial for reaching relevance and responsibility in AI art.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has engrossed the mainstream culture, expanded AI's creative user base, and catalyzed economic, legal, and aesthetic issues that stir a lively public debate. Unsurprisingly, GenAI tools proliferate kitsch in the hands of amateurs and hobbyists, but various shortcomings also induce kitsch into a more ambitious, professional artists' production with GenAI. I explore them in this paper. Following the introductory outline of digital kitsch and AI art, I review GenAI artworks that manifest five interrelated types of kitsch-engendering expressive flaws: the superficial foregrounding or faulty circumvention of generative models' formal signatures, the feeble critique of AI, the mimetics, and the unacknowledged poetic similarities, all marked by an overreliance on AI as a cultural signifier. I discuss the normalization of these blunders through GenAI art's good standing within the art world and keen relationship with the AI industry, which contributes to the adulteration of AI discourse and the possible corruption of artistic literacy. In conclusion, I emphasize that recognizing different facets of artists' uncritical embrace of techno-cultural trends, comprehending their functions, and anticipating their unintended effects is crucial for reaching relevance and responsibility in AI art.
Related papers
- Incidental Reverberations: Poetic Similarities in AI Art [0.0]
I argue that expressive similarities in AI art are as detrimental to its cultural value as they are avoidable.<n>My critique takes the well-informed autonomy of expression and the socially responsible freedom of creative thinking to indicate some of AI art's related issues and challenges induced by its entanglements with AI science, technology, and industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-23T12:19:37Z) - Art Notions in the Age of (Mis)anthropic AI [0.0]
I take the cultural effects of generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) as a context for examining a broader perspective of AI's impact on contemporary art notions.<n>I summarize the distinct but often confused aspects of art notions and review the principal lines in which AI influences them.<n>I introduce several viewpoints for a further critique of AI's cultural zeitgeist.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-20T13:27:28Z) - Strange Undercurrents: A Critical Outlook on AI's Cultural Influence [0.0]
generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) is being examined extensively.<n>This paper summarizes a broader study of AI's influence on art notions focusing on the confluence of certain foundational concepts in computer science and ideological vectors of the AI industry that transfer into art, culture, and society.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T21:07:56Z) - The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Traditional Art Forms: A Disruption or Enhancement [0.0]
We look at the ways that recent technologies like Geneversarative Adrial Networks and Diffusion Models are changing the fields of painting, sculpture, calligraphy, dance, music, and the arts of craft.<n>Using examples and data, we illustrate the ways that AI can democratize creative expression, improve productivity, and preserve cultural heritage.<n>We advocate for the development of ethical guidelines, collaborative approaches, and inclusive technology development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-07T16:37:04Z) - AI as IA: The use and abuse of artificial intelligence (AI) for human enhancement through intellectual augmentation (IA) [45.88028371034407]
This paper offers an overview of the prospects and ethics of using AI to achieve human enhancement.<n>We discuss potential ethical problems, namely inadequate performance, safety, coercion and manipulation, privacy, cognitive liberty, authenticity, and fairness.<n>We conclude that while there are very significant technical hurdles to real human enhancement through AI, and significant ethical problems, there are also significant benefits that may realistically be achieved.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-18T09:39:11Z) - What's Behind the Magic? Audiences Seek Artistic Value in Generative AI's Contributions to a Live Dance Performance [4.281723404774888]
We developed two versions of a dance performance augmented by technology either with or without GenAI.<n>For each version we informed audiences of the performance's development either before or after a survey on their perceptions of the performance.<n>Results demonstrated that individuals were more inclined to attribute artistic merit to works made by GenAI when they were unaware of its use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T00:51:17Z) - The Ethical Implications of AI in Creative Industries: A Focus on AI-Generated Art [0.0]
This paper explores the complications and confusion around the ethics of generative AI art.<n>We step back from the excitement and observe the impossible conundrums that this impressive technology produces.<n>Our research found that generative AI art is responsible for increased carbon emissions, spreading misinformation, copyright infringement, unlawful depiction, and job displacement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-08T00:16:38Z) - The Shady Light of Art Automation [0.0]
The paper summarizes a broader study of the roles that AI's conceptual and ideological substrata play in influencing art notions.<n>The focus is on divergent but coalescing and often questionable ideas, values, and political views that generative AI and other art-related AI technologies propagate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T12:50:05Z) - Generative AI for Cel-Animation: A Survey [59.20171452237911]
GenAI is revolutionizing traditional animation by lowering technical barriers, broadening accessibility for a wider range of creators.<n>Despite its potential, challenges like consistency, stylistic coherence, and ethical considerations persist.<n>This paper explores future directions advancements in AI-assisted animation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-08T20:57:39Z) - "I Am the One and Only, Your Cyber BFF": Understanding the Impact of GenAI Requires Understanding the Impact of Anthropomorphic AI [55.99010491370177]
We argue that we cannot thoroughly map the social impacts of generative AI without mapping the social impacts of anthropomorphic AI.
anthropomorphic AI systems are increasingly prone to generating outputs that are perceived to be human-like.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T04:57:41Z) - Human Bias in the Face of AI: Examining Human Judgment Against Text Labeled as AI Generated [48.70176791365903]
This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content.<n>We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z) - Toward an Artist-Centred AI [0.0]
This paper contextualizes the notions of suitability and desirability of principles, practices, and tools related to the use of AI in the arts.
It was composed by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-13T09:43:23Z) - DeepfakeArt Challenge: A Benchmark Dataset for Generative AI Art Forgery and Data Poisoning Detection [57.51313366337142]
There has been growing concern over the use of generative AI for malicious purposes.
In the realm of visual content synthesis using generative AI, key areas of significant concern has been image forgery and data poisoning.
We introduce the DeepfakeArt Challenge, a large-scale challenge benchmark dataset designed specifically to aid in the building of machine learning algorithms for generative AI art forgery and data poisoning detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T05:11:27Z) - Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps.
We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches.
We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z) - Pathway to Future Symbiotic Creativity [76.20798455931603]
We propose a classification of the creative system with a hierarchy of 5 classes, showing the pathway of creativity evolving from a mimic-human artist to a Machine artist in its own right.
In art creation, it is necessary for machines to understand humans' mental states, including desires, appreciation, and emotions, humans also need to understand machines' creative capabilities and limitations.
We propose a novel framework for building future Machine artists, which comes with the philosophy that a human-compatible AI system should be based on the "human-in-the-loop" principle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-18T15:12:02Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.