Addressing OSS Community Managers' Challenges in Contributor Retention

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11447v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 23:51:01 GMT
• Title: Addressing OSS Community Managers' Challenges in Contributor Retention
• Abstract summary: Current tools for managing contributor retention (e.g., dashboards) fall short by providing retrospective rather than predictive insights to identify potential disengagement early.<n>Our study offers (1) empirical insights into the challenges of contributor retention management in OSS, (2) actionable strategies that support OSS community managers' retention efforts, and (3) a practical framework for future research in developing or validating theories about OSS sustainability.
• Score: 17.01123608526415
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Open-source software (OSS) community managers face significant challenges in retaining contributors, as they must monitor activity and engagement while navigating complex dynamics of collaboration. Current tools designed for managing contributor retention (e.g., dashboards) fall short by providing retrospective rather than predictive insights to identify potential disengagement early. Without understanding how to anticipate and prevent disengagement, new solutions risk burdening community managers rather than supporting retention management. Following the Design Science Research paradigm, we employed a mixed-methods approach for problem identification and solution design to address contributor retention. To identify the challenges hindering retention management in OSS, we conducted semi-structured interviews, a multi-vocal literature review, and community surveys. Then through an iterative build-evaluate cycle, we developed and refined strategies for diagnosing retention risks and informing engagement efforts. We operationalized these strategies into a web-based prototype, incorporating feedback from 100+ OSS practitioners, and conducted an in situ evaluation across two OSS communities. Our study offers (1) empirical insights into the challenges of contributor retention management in OSS, (2) actionable strategies that support OSS community managers' retention efforts, and (3) a practical framework for future research in developing or validating theories about OSS sustainability.

Related papers

• Learning Agent-Compatible Context Management for Long-Horizon Tasks [79.09330817637205]
  We introduce Adaptive Context Management (AdaCoM), which trains an external LLM to manage the context of a frozen agent.<n>AdaCoM substantially improves performance by preserving task constraints and progress while pruning stale content.<n>The learned strategies reveal a Fidelity-Reliability Trade-off: agents with higher vanilla ReAct performance benefit from higher-fidelity context preservation, whereas lower-performing agents require more aggressive compression to stay within a reliable reasoning regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T03:21:08Z)
• The First Issue Matters: Linking Task-Level Characteristics to Long-Term Newcomer Retention in OSS [26.566968795185776]
  Sustaining newcomer participation is critical for the long-term health of open-source communities.<n>We combine predictive analysis, interpretability techniques, and causal inference to estimate the causal effects of issue characteristics on retention outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T04:55:06Z)
• Co-RedTeam: Orchestrated Security Discovery and Exploitation with LLM Agents [57.49020237126194]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in assisting cybersecurity tasks, yet existing approaches struggle with automatic vulnerability discovery and exploitation.<n>We propose Co-RedTeam, a security-aware multi-agent framework designed to mirror real-world red-teaming.<n>Co-RedTeam decomposes vulnerability analysis into coordinated discovery and exploitation stages, enabling agents to plan, execute, validate, and refine actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T14:38:45Z)
• AI That Helps Us Help Each Other: A Proactive System for Scaffolding Mentor-Novice Collaboration in Entrepreneurship Coaching [3.101600812051321]
  Entrepreneurship requires navigating open-ended, ill-defined problems.<n>We present a human-AI coaching system that scaffolds both novice and mentor thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T20:23:48Z)
• A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyond [88.5807076505261]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance gains by scaling up the length of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning during inference.<n>A growing concern lies in their tendency to produce excessively long reasoning traces.<n>This inefficiency introduces significant challenges for training, inference, and real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T15:36:30Z)
• The Role of the Retrospective Meetings in Detecting, Refactoring and Monitoring Community Smells [0.5219568203653523]
  The study focused on the four most cited Community Smells in the literature -- Lone Wolf, Organizational Silo, Radio Silence, and Black Cloud.<n>The findings indicate that retrospective meetings indeed enable the identification of core Community Smells.<n>An emphasis on positive aspects during these meetings may help in preventing Community Smells.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T21:50:13Z)
• Protocol Learning, Decentralized Frontier Risk and the No-Off Problem [56.74434512241989]
  We identify a third paradigm - Protocol Learning - where models are trained across decentralized networks of incentivized participants.<n>This approach has the potential to aggregate orders of magnitude more computational resources than any single centralized entity.<n>It also introduces novel challenges: heterogeneous and unreliable nodes, malicious participants, the need for unextractable models to preserve incentives, and complex governance dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T19:53:50Z)
• CROSS: A Contributor-Project Interaction Lifecycle Model for Open Source Software [2.9631016562930546]
  Cross model is a novel contributor-project interaction lifecycle model for open source software. It explains a range of archetypal cases of contributor engagement and highlights research gaps, especially in EoS/offboarding scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T17:57:12Z)
• A Mixed-Methods Study of Open-Source Software Maintainers On Vulnerability Management and Platform Security Features [6.814841205623832]
  This paper investigates the perspectives of OSS maintainers on vulnerability management and platform security features.<n>We find that supply chain mistrust and lack of automation for vulnerability management are the most challenging.<n> barriers to adopting platform security features include a lack of awareness and the perception that they are not necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T00:15:03Z)
• Devil's Advocate: Anticipatory Reflection for LLM Agents [53.897557605550325]
  Our approach prompts LLM agents to decompose a given task into manageable subtasks. We implement a three-fold introspective intervention:. Anticipatory reflection on potential failures and alternative remedy before action execution. Post-action alignment with subtask objectives and backtracking with remedy to ensure utmost effort in plan execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T19:20:15Z)
• How to Sustain a Scientific Open-Source Software Ecosystem: Learning from the Astropy Project [9.049664874474736]
  This study examines the challenges and opportunities to enhance the sustainability of scientific OSS. We conducted a case study on a widely-used software ecosystem in the astrophysics domain, the Astropy Project.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T03:54:53Z)
• On the Value of Myopic Behavior in Policy Reuse [67.37788288093299]
  Leveraging learned strategies in unfamiliar scenarios is fundamental to human intelligence. In this work, we present a framework called Selective Myopic bEhavior Control(SMEC) SMEC adaptively aggregates the sharable short-term behaviors of prior policies and the long-term behaviors of the task policy, leading to coordinated decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T03:59:37Z)
• L2Explorer: A Lifelong Reinforcement Learning Assessment Environment [49.40779372040652]
  Reinforcement learning solutions tend to generalize poorly when exposed to new tasks outside of the data distribution they are trained on. We introduce a framework for continual reinforcement-learning development and assessment using Lifelong Learning Explorer (L2Explorer) L2Explorer is a new, Unity-based, first-person 3D exploration environment that can be continuously reconfigured to generate a range of tasks and task variants structured into complex evaluation curricula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T19:20:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.