Governing Social Media as a Public Utility: A Case for Sovereign Digital Infrastructure

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12535v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 02:31:16 GMT
• Title: Governing Social Media as a Public Utility: A Case for Sovereign Digital Infrastructure
• Abstract summary: Social media platforms amplify societal harm through misinformation.<n>Current governance frameworks delegate content moderation to corporations.<n>We propose a public utility model for social media governance that prioritizes the public good over commercial incentives.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms connect billions, but their business models often amplify societal harm through misinformation, which is linked to polarization, violence, and declining mental health. Current governance frameworks, such as the U.S. Section 230 and the EU Digital Services Act, delegate content moderation to corporations. This creates structural conflicts of interest because misinformation drives engagement, and engagement drives profit. We propose a public utility model for social media governance that prioritizes the public good over commercial incentives. Integrating legislated content removal with democratic content moderation, the model protects free expression while mitigating societal harms. It frames social media as sovereign digital infrastructure governed through democratic oversight, transparent algorithms, and institutional safeguards.

Related papers

• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media [124.26693978503339]
  Social media platforms have traditionally relied on independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.<n>X (formerly Twitter) and Meta have shifted towards community-driven content moderation by launching their own versions of crowd-sourced fact-checking.<n>We examine the current approaches to misinformation detection across major platforms, explore the emerging role of community-driven moderation, and critically evaluate both the promises and challenges of crowd-checking at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:50:18Z)
• Generative AI as Digital Media [0.0]
  Generative AI is frequently portrayed as revolutionary or even apocalyptic.<n>This essay argues that such views are misguided.<n>Instead, generative AI should be understood as an evolutionary step in the broader algorithmic media landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T08:58:17Z)
• Trust and Friction: Negotiating How Information Flows Through Decentralized Social Media [1.1306212771477646]
  Decentralized social media protocols enable users in independent, user-hosted servers to interact with each other while they self-govern.<n>This community-based model of social media governance opens up new opportunities for tailored decision-making about information flows.<n>We conducted a semi-structured interview with 23 users of the Fediverse, a decentralized social media network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T00:29:32Z)
• Prosocial Media [0.8364301918204937]
  Social media empower distributed content creation by algorithmically harnessing "the social fabric"<n>This paper participates in open and ongoing considerations to translate social and political values and conventions, specifically social cohesion, into platform design.<n>We propose an alternative platform model that includes the social fabric an explicit output as well as input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T15:28:19Z)
• Content Moderation on Social Media in the EU: Insights From the DSA Transparency Database [0.0]
  Digital Services Act (DSA) requires large social media platforms in the EU to provide clear and specific information whenever they restrict access to certain content. Statements of Reasons (SoRs) are collected in the DSA Transparency Database to ensure transparency and scrutiny of content moderation decisions. We empirically analyze 156 million SoRs within an observation period of two months to provide an early look at content moderation decisions of social media platforms in the EU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T16:56:19Z)
• A User-Driven Framework for Regulating and Auditing Social Media [94.70018274127231]
  We propose that algorithmic filtering should be regulated with respect to a flexible, user-driven baseline. We require that the feeds a platform filters contain "similar" informational content as their respective baseline feeds. We present an auditing procedure that checks whether a platform honors this requirement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T17:53:34Z)
• Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest [70.02478301291264]
  Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse. Prior studies have used black-box methods to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes. We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T17:32:35Z)
• The Quest for Development: When Social Media-Brokered Political Power Encounters Political 'Flak Jackets' [0.0]
  Social media provides an extended space for collective action, as netizens leverage it as a tool for claim-making and for demanding the dividends of governance. Political regimes often greet expanding use of social media with censorship, which netizens often have to contend with. This research is conducted on the basis of key informant interviews with voices against social media censorship in Nigeria since the inception of Nigeria's ruling government in 2015.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T14:45:22Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy management challenge [58.720142291102135]
  In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data is crucial to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths. In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T13:19:38Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.