On Theoretically-Driven LLM Agents for Multi-Dimensional Discourse Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13713v1
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:30:39 GMT
- Title: On Theoretically-Driven LLM Agents for Multi-Dimensional Discourse Analysis
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a comparative multi-agent framework designed to quantify the benefits of incorporating explicit theoretical knowledge for this task.<n>We utilise a dataset of annotated political debates to establish a new standard encompassing four distinct rephrase functions.<n>We evaluate two parallel LLM-based agent systems: one enhanced by argumentation theory via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and an identical zero-shot baseline.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Identifying the strategic uses of reformulation in discourse remains a key challenge for computational argumentation. While LLMs can detect surface-level similarity, they often fail to capture the pragmatic functions of rephrasing, such as its role within rhetorical discourse. This paper presents a comparative multi-agent framework designed to quantify the benefits of incorporating explicit theoretical knowledge for this task. We utilise an dataset of annotated political debates to establish a new standard encompassing four distinct rephrase functions: Deintensification, Intensification, Specification, Generalisation, and Other, which covers all remaining types (D-I-S-G-O). We then evaluate two parallel LLM-based agent systems: one enhanced by argumentation theory via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and an identical zero-shot baseline. The results reveal a clear performance gap: the RAG-enhanced agents substantially outperform the baseline across the board, with particularly strong advantages in detecting Intensification and Generalisation context, yielding an overall Macro F1-score improvement of nearly 30\%. Our findings provide evidence that theoretical grounding is not only beneficial but essential for advancing beyond mere paraphrase detection towards function-aware analysis of argumentative discourse. This comparative multi-agent architecture represents a step towards scalable, theoretically informed computational tools capable of identifying rhetorical strategies in contemporary discourse.
Related papers
- Func-R1: Incentivizing Mathematical Function Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [47.0185752409638]
We propose Func-R1, which harmonizes precise visual perception and rigorous logical reasoning.<n>Func-R1 delivers the optimal performance among open-source MLLMs, even surpassing GPT-5 with an 8.4% improvement on MathVerse's function-oriented tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-13T20:39:43Z) - Understanding Textual Capability Degradation in Speech LLMs via Parameter Importance Analysis [54.53152524778821]
integration of speech into Large Language Models (LLMs) has substantially expanded their capabilities, but often at the cost of weakening their core textual competence.<n>We propose an analytical framework based on parameter importance estimation, which reveals that fine-tuning for speech introduces a textual importance distribution shift.<n>We investigate two mitigation strategies: layer-wise learning rate scheduling and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)<n> Experimental results show that both approaches better maintain textual competence than full fine-tuning, while also improving downstream spoken question answering performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T09:04:40Z) - Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [67.53966514728383]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong generalization across a wide range of tasks.<n>Recent studies have shifted attention from explicit chain-of-thought prompting toward implicit reasoning.<n>This survey introduces a taxonomy centered on execution paradigms, shifting the focus from representational forms to computational strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T14:16:02Z) - HOID-R1: Reinforcement Learning for Open-World Human-Object Interaction Detection Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Model [13.82578761807402]
We introduce HOID-R1, the first HOI detection framework that integrates chain-of-thought (CoT) guided fine-tuning with group relative policy optimization.<n>To mitigate hallucinations in the CoT reasoning, we introduce an "MLLM-as-a-judge" mechanism that supervises the CoT outputs.<n>Experiments show that HOID-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance on HOI detection benchmarks and outperforms existing methods in open-world generalization to novel scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-15T09:28:57Z) - PrismRAG: Boosting RAG Factuality with Distractor Resilience and Strategized Reasoning [57.89188317734747]
PrismRAG trains the model with distractor-aware QA pairs mixing gold evidence with subtle distractor passages.<n>It instills reasoning-centric habits that make the LLM plan, rationalize, and synthesize without relying on extensive human engineered instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-25T00:15:31Z) - Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs [69.10441885629787]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) lifts the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by injecting external knowledge.<n>It falls short on problems that demand multi-step inference; conversely, purely reasoning-oriented approaches often hallucinate or mis-ground facts.<n>This survey synthesizes both strands under a unified reasoning-retrieval perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-13T03:29:41Z) - Learning Efficient and Generalizable Graph Retriever for Knowledge-Graph Question Answering [75.12322966980003]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong inductive reasoning ability across various domains.<n>Most existing RAG pipelines rely on unstructured text, limiting interpretability and structured reasoning.<n>Recent studies have explored integrating knowledge graphs with LLMs for knowledge graph question answering.<n>We propose RAPL, a novel framework for efficient and effective graph retrieval in KGQA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-11T12:03:52Z) - Argumentation Computation with Large Language Models : A Benchmark Study [6.0682923348298194]
Large language models (LLMs) have made significant advancements in neuro-symbolic computing.<n>We aim to investigate the capability of LLMs in determining the extensions of various abstract argumentation semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-21T18:23:06Z) - Synergies between Disentanglement and Sparsity: Generalization and
Identifiability in Multi-Task Learning [79.83792914684985]
We prove a new identifiability result that provides conditions under which maximally sparse base-predictors yield disentangled representations.
Motivated by this theoretical result, we propose a practical approach to learn disentangled representations based on a sparsity-promoting bi-level optimization problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-26T21:02:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.