Understanding Textual Capability Degradation in Speech LLMs via Parameter Importance Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23755v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 09:04:40 GMT
• Title: Understanding Textual Capability Degradation in Speech LLMs via Parameter Importance Analysis
• Authors: Chao Wang, Rui-Chen Zheng, Yang Ai, Zhen-Hua Ling,
• Abstract summary: integration of speech into Large Language Models (LLMs) has substantially expanded their capabilities, but often at the cost of weakening their core textual competence.<n>We propose an analytical framework based on parameter importance estimation, which reveals that fine-tuning for speech introduces a textual importance distribution shift.<n>We investigate two mitigation strategies: layer-wise learning rate scheduling and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)<n> Experimental results show that both approaches better maintain textual competence than full fine-tuning, while also improving downstream spoken question answering performance.
• Score: 54.53152524778821
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The integration of speech into Large Language Models (LLMs) has substantially expanded their capabilities, but often at the cost of weakening their core textual competence. This degradation limits the ability of speech-enabled LLMs to fully exploit their pre-trained text-based knowledge. In this work, we analyze the underlying mechanisms of this issue through a focused study of the widely used encoder-adaptor paradigm. We propose an analytical framework based on parameter importance estimation, which reveals that fine-tuning for speech introduces a textual importance distribution shift: the layer-wise allocation of parameters critical to textual reasoning is disrupted. Building on this insight, we investigate two mitigation strategies: layer-wise learning rate scheduling and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), both aim to preserve the original parameter distribution. Experimental results show that both approaches better maintain textual competence than full fine-tuning, while also improving downstream spoken question answering performance. Furthermore, our analysis offers a principled explanation for the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation strategies, linking their benefits to the structural properties of textual knowledge in LLMs.

Related papers

• On Theoretically-Driven LLM Agents for Multi-Dimensional Discourse Analysis [0.0]
  This paper presents a comparative multi-agent framework designed to quantify the benefits of incorporating explicit theoretical knowledge for this task.<n>We utilise a dataset of annotated political debates to establish a new standard encompassing four distinct rephrase functions.<n>We evaluate two parallel LLM-based agent systems: one enhanced by argumentation theory via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and an identical zero-shot baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T10:30:39Z)
• Factors That Support Grounded Responses in LLM Conversations: A Rapid Review [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) may generate outputs that are misaligned with user intent, lack contextual grounding, or exhibit hallucinations during conversation.<n>This review aimed to identify and analyze techniques that align LLM responses with conversational goals, ensure grounding, and reduce hallucination and topic drift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T21:18:46Z)
• Behind the Scenes: Mechanistic Interpretability of LoRA-adapted Whisper for Speech Emotion Recognition [5.343939245180883]
  Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a popular parameter-efficient fine-tuning method.<n>We conduct the first systematic mechanistic interpretability study of LoRA within the Whisper encoder for speech emotion recognition.<n>Our findings clarify how LoRA reshapes encoder hierarchies, providing both empirical insights and a deeper mechanistic understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T09:54:27Z)
• Integration of Explainable AI Techniques with Large Language Models for Enhanced Interpretability for Sentiment Analysis [0.5120567378386615]
  Interpretability remains a key difficulty in sentiment analysis with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This research introduces a technique that applies SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) by breaking down LLMs into components such as embedding layer,encoder,decoder and attention layer.<n>The method is evaluated using the Stanford Sentiment Treebank (SST-2) dataset, which shows how different sentences affect different layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-15T01:37:54Z)
• Semantic Consistency Regularization with Large Language Models for Semi-supervised Sentiment Analysis [20.503153899462323]
  We propose a framework for semi-supervised sentiment analysis.<n>We introduce two prompting strategies to semantically enhance unlabeled text.<n> Experiments show our method achieves remarkable performance over prior semi-supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T12:03:11Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Agents with Interactive Environments: Quantifying and Mitigating Prompt Overfitting [31.8820901475938]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising approach for aligning large language models (LLMs) knowledge with sequential decision-making tasks.<n>We propose a novel framework to analyze the sensitivity of LLMs to prompt formulations following RL training in a textual environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T18:25:35Z)
• Deconfounded Causality-aware Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Problem-Solving Improvement of LLMs [12.48241058167222]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in tackling various tasks based on human instructions. But studies reveal that they often struggle with tasks requiring reasoning, such as math or physics limitation. This raises questions about whether LLMs truly comprehend embedded knowledge or merely learn to replicate the token distribution without a true understanding of the content. We propose Decon Causal Adaptation (DCA), a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method to enhance the model's reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T13:17:09Z)
• Evaluating Human Alignment and Model Faithfulness of LLM Rationale [66.75309523854476]
  We study how well large language models (LLMs) explain their generations through rationales. We show that prompting-based methods are less "faithful" than attribution-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T20:06:30Z)
• LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
  Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges. Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model. This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z)
• Enhancing Systematic Decompositional Natural Language Inference Using Informal Logic [51.967603572656266]
  We introduce a consistent and theoretically grounded approach to annotating decompositional entailment. We find that our new dataset, RDTE, has a substantially higher internal consistency (+9%) than prior decompositional entailment datasets. We also find that training an RDTE-oriented entailment classifier via knowledge distillation and employing it in an entailment tree reasoning engine significantly improves both accuracy and proof quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T18:55:17Z)
• Sparsity-Guided Holistic Explanation for LLMs with Interpretable Inference-Time Intervention [53.896974148579346]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented breakthroughs in various natural language processing domains. The enigmatic black-box'' nature of LLMs remains a significant challenge for interpretability, hampering transparent and accountable applications. We propose a novel methodology anchored in sparsity-guided techniques, aiming to provide a holistic interpretation of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T19:55:58Z)
• How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
  The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges. We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z)
• Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models [87.46256176508376]
  We introduce a simple, yet general and effective prompting method, Re2, to enhance the reasoning capabilities of off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs) Unlike most thought-eliciting prompting methods, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Re2 shifts the focus to the input by processing questions twice, thereby enhancing the understanding process. We evaluate Re2 on extensive reasoning benchmarks across 14 datasets, spanning 112 experiments, to validate its effectiveness and generality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T14:36:23Z)
• Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
  Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.