Multi-Agent Debate: A Unified Agentic Framework for Tabular Anomaly Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14251v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2026 17:44:32 GMT
• Title: Multi-Agent Debate: A Unified Agentic Framework for Tabular Anomaly Detection
• Authors: Pinqiao Wang, Sheng Li,
• Abstract summary: Multi-Agent Debating framework (MAD) treats disagreement as a first-class signal.<n> MAD produces a normalized anomaly score, confidence, and structured evidence, augmented by a large language model (LLM)-based critic.<n>We show how conformal calibration can wrap the debated score to control false positives under exchangeability.
• Score: 7.807411603618987
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Tabular anomaly detection is often handled by single detectors or static ensembles, even though strong performance on tabular data typically comes from heterogeneous model families (e.g., tree ensembles, deep tabular networks, and tabular foundation models) that frequently disagree under distribution shift, missingness, and rare-anomaly regimes. We propose MAD, a Multi-Agent Debating framework that treats this disagreement as a first-class signal and resolves it through a mathematically grounded coordination layer. Each agent is a machine learning (ML)-based detector that produces a normalized anomaly score, confidence, and structured evidence, augmented by a large language model (LLM)-based critic. A coordinator converts these messages into bounded per-agent losses and updates agent influence via an exponentiated-gradient rule, yielding both a final debated anomaly score and an auditable debate trace. MAD is a unified agentic framework that can recover existing approaches, such as mixture-of-experts gating and learning-with-expert-advice aggregation, by restricting the message space and synthesis operator. We establish regret guarantees for the synthesized losses and show how conformal calibration can wrap the debated score to control false positives under exchangeability. Experiments on diverse tabular anomaly benchmarks show improved robustness over baselines and clearer traces of model disagreement

Related papers

• Graph-theoretic Agreement Framework for Multi-agent LLM Systems [0.228438857884398]
  This paper establishes a rigorous graph-theoretic framework for analyzing consensus in signed, directed interaction networks.<n>We show how unbalanced critique cycles produce logical frustration and persistent reasoning oscillations.<n>We prove that rank-one spectral edge perturbations deterministically break symmetry by shifting eigenvalues into the stable left-half plane.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T02:30:48Z)
• The Emergence of Lab-Driven Alignment Signatures: A Psychometric Framework for Auditing Latent Bias and Compounding Risk in Generative AI [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel auditing framework to quantify latent trait estimation under ordinal uncertainty.<n>The research audits nine leading models across dimensions including Optimization Bias, Sycophancy, and Status-Quo Legitimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:56:01Z)
• Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
  We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z)
• Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text Detection [105.14032334647932]
  Machine-generated texts (MGTs) pose risks such as disinformation and phishing, highlighting the need for reliable detection.<n> Metric-based methods, which extract statistically distinguishable features of MGTs, are often more practical than complex model-based methods that are prone to overfitting.<n>We propose a Markov-informed score calibration strategy that models two relationships of context detection scores that may aid calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T16:06:12Z)
• Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction via Transformer-Based Models [45.08545174556591]
  We propose an unsupervised anomaly detection framework based on a multi-agent Transformer.<n>A dual evaluation scheme has been proposed to assess both detection stability and physical alignment.<n>Our framework identifies 388 unique anomalies missed by Time-to-Collision and statistical baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T08:33:10Z)
• Cascading multi-agent anomaly detection in surveillance systems via vision-language models and embedding-based classification [0.0]
  This work introduces a cascading multi-agent framework that unifies complementary paradigms into a coherent and interpretable architecture.<n>Early modules perform reconstruction-gated filtering and object-level assessment, while higher-level reasoning agents are selectively invoked to interpret semantically ambiguous events.<n>The framework advances beyond conventional detection pipelines by combining early-exit efficiency, adaptive multi-agent reasoning, and explainable anomaly attribution, establishing a reproducible and energy-efficient foundation for scalable intelligent visual monitoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T11:31:47Z)
• Explainable and Fine-Grained Safeguarding of LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Bi-Level Graph Anomaly Detection [76.91230292971115]
  Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown strong capabilities in solving complex tasks.<n>XG-Guard is an explainable and fine-grained safeguarding framework for detecting malicious agents in MAS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T13:46:36Z)
• AgentIAD: Tool-Augmented Single-Agent for Industrial Anomaly Detection [9.208080780536504]
  AgentIAD is a tool-driven framework that enables multi-stage visual inspection.<n>AgentIAD achieves a new state-of-the-art 97.62% classification accuracy on MMAD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T18:57:04Z)
• SetAD: Semi-Supervised Anomaly Learning in Contextual Sets [25.628827917857603]
  Semi-supervised anomaly detection has shown great promise by effectively leveraging limited labeled data.<n>We propose SetAD, a novel framework that reframes semi-supervised AD as a Set-level Anomaly Detection task.<n>To enhance robustness and score calibration, we propose a context-calibrated anomaly scoring mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T13:27:59Z)
• Metacognitive Self-Correction for Multi-Agent System via Prototype-Guided Next-Execution Reconstruction [58.51530390018909]
  Large Language Model based multi-agent systems excel at collaborative problem solving but remain brittle to cascading errors.<n>We present MASC, a metacognitive framework that endows MAS with real-time, unsupervised, step-level error detection and self-correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T05:35:37Z)
• Detecting Multilevel Manipulation from Limit Order Book via Cascaded Contrastive Representation Learning [4.11124360246468]
  Spoofing is one of the most covert and deceptive TBM strategies.<n>These patterns are usually concealed within the rich, hierarchical information of the Limit Order Book.<n>We propose a representation learning framework combining a cascaded LOB representation architecture with supervised contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-23T16:57:32Z)
• Generate Aligned Anomaly: Region-Guided Few-Shot Anomaly Image-Mask Pair Synthesis for Industrial Inspection [53.137651284042434]
  Anomaly inspection plays a vital role in industrial manufacturing, but the scarcity of anomaly samples limits the effectiveness of existing methods.<n>We propose Generate grained Anomaly (GAA), a region-guided, few-shot anomaly image-mask pair generation framework.<n>GAA generates realistic, diverse, and semantically aligned anomalies using only a small number of samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T12:56:59Z)
• Generating and Reweighting Dense Contrastive Patterns for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection [59.34318192698142]
  We introduce a prior-less anomaly generation paradigm and develop an innovative unsupervised anomaly detection framework named GRAD. PatchDiff effectively expose various types of anomaly patterns. experiments on both MVTec AD and MVTec LOCO datasets also support the aforementioned observation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:08:06Z)
• Hard-normal Example-aware Template Mutual Matching for Industrial Anomaly Detection [78.734927709231]
  Anomaly detectors are widely used in industrial manufacturing to detect and localize unknown defects in query images.<n>These detectors are trained on anomaly-free samples and have successfully distinguished anomalies from most normal samples.<n>However, hard-normal examples are scattered and far apart from most normal samples, and thus they are often mistaken for anomalies by existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T17:54:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.