Robust Bias Evaluation with FilBBQ: A Filipino Bias Benchmark for Question-Answering Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14466v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 05:03:15 GMT
• Title: Robust Bias Evaluation with FilBBQ: A Filipino Bias Benchmark for Question-Answering Language Models
• Authors: Lance Calvin Lim Gamboa, Yue Feng, Mark Lee,
• Abstract summary: Bias Benchmark for Question-Answering (BBQ) has grown to be an important benchmark format for evaluating stereotypical associations exhibited by generative models.<n>We construct FilBBQ through a four-phase development process consisting of template categorization, culturally aware translation, new template construction, and prompt generation.<n>We apply FilBBQ on models trained in Filipino but do so with a robust evaluation protocol that improves upon the reliability and accuracy of previous BBQ implementations.
• Score: 5.756606441319472
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With natural language generation becoming a popular use case for language models, the Bias Benchmark for Question-Answering (BBQ) has grown to be an important benchmark format for evaluating stereotypical associations exhibited by generative models. We expand the linguistic scope of BBQ and construct FilBBQ through a four-phase development process consisting of template categorization, culturally aware translation, new template construction, and prompt generation. These processes resulted in a bias test composed of more than 10,000 prompts which assess whether models demonstrate sexist and homophobic prejudices relevant to the Philippine context. We then apply FilBBQ on models trained in Filipino but do so with a robust evaluation protocol that improves upon the reliability and accuracy of previous BBQ implementations. Specifically, we account for models' response instability by obtaining prompt responses across multiple seeds and averaging the bias scores calculated from these distinctly seeded runs. Our results confirm both the variability of bias scores across different seeds and the presence of sexist and homophobic biases relating to emotion, domesticity, stereotyped queer interests, and polygamy. FilBBQ is available via GitHub.

Related papers

• PakBBQ: A Culturally Adapted Bias Benchmark for QA [3.4455728937232597]
  We introduce PakBBQ, a culturally and regionally adapted extension of the original Bias Benchmark for Question Answering dataset.<n> PakBBQ comprises over 214 templates, 17180 QA pairs across 8 categories in both English and Urdu, covering eight bias dimensions including age, disability, appearance, gender, socio-economic status, religious, regional affiliation, and language formality that are relevant in Pakistan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T20:42:44Z)
• HeQ: a Large and Diverse Hebrew Reading Comprehension Benchmark [54.73504952691398]
  We set out to deliver a Hebrew Machine Reading dataset as extractive Questioning.<n>The morphologically rich nature of Hebrew poses a challenge to this endeavor.<n>We devise a novel set of guidelines, a controlled crowdsourcing protocol, and revised evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T15:53:01Z)
• EsBBQ and CaBBQ: The Spanish and Catalan Bias Benchmarks for Question Answering [1.6630304911300329]
  This paper introduces the Spanish and the Catalan Bias Benchmarks for Question Answering (EsBBQ and CaBBQ)<n>Based on the original BBQ, these two parallel datasets are designed to assess social bias across 10 categories using a multiple-choice QA setting.<n>We report evaluation results on different Large Language Models, factoring in model family, size and variant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T11:37:30Z)
• Beyond Early-Token Bias: Model-Specific and Language-Specific Position Effects in Multilingual LLMs [50.07451351559251]
  We present a study across five typologically distinct languages (English, Russian, German, Hindi, and Vietnamese)<n>We examine how position bias interacts with prompt strategies and affects output entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T02:23:00Z)
• A Probability--Quality Trade-off in Aligned Language Models and its Relation to Sampling Adaptors [50.046717886067555]
  We show that when sampling corpora from an aligned language model, there exists a trade-off between the strings' average reward and average log-likelihood. We provide a formal treatment of this phenomenon and demonstrate how a choice of sampling adaptor allows for a selection of how much likelihood we exchange for the reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:38:21Z)
• MBBQ: A Dataset for Cross-Lingual Comparison of Stereotypes in Generative LLMs [6.781972039785424]
  Generative large language models (LLMs) have been shown to exhibit harmful biases and stereotypes. We present MBBQ, a dataset that measures stereotypes commonly held across Dutch, Spanish, and Turkish languages. Our results confirm that some non-English languages suffer from bias more than English, even when controlling for cultural shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T13:23:14Z)
• Mitigating Bias for Question Answering Models by Tracking Bias Influence [84.66462028537475]
  We propose BMBI, an approach to mitigate the bias of multiple-choice QA models. Based on the intuition that a model would lean to be more biased if it learns from a biased example, we measure the bias level of a query instance. We show that our method could be applied to multiple QA formulations across multiple bias categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T00:49:09Z)
• KoBBQ: Korean Bias Benchmark for Question Answering [28.091808407408823]
  The Bias Benchmark for Question Answering (BBQ) is designed to evaluate social biases of language models (LMs) We present KoBBQ, a Korean bias benchmark dataset. We propose a general framework that addresses considerations for cultural adaptation of a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T15:44:15Z)
• CBBQ: A Chinese Bias Benchmark Dataset Curated with Human-AI Collaboration for Large Language Models [52.25049362267279]
  We present a Chinese Bias Benchmark dataset that consists of over 100K questions jointly constructed by human experts and generative language models. The testing instances in the dataset are automatically derived from 3K+ high-quality templates manually authored with stringent quality control. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the dataset in detecting model bias, with all 10 publicly available Chinese large language models exhibiting strong bias in certain categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T14:14:44Z)
• BiasTestGPT: Using ChatGPT for Social Bias Testing of Language Models [73.29106813131818]
  bias testing is currently cumbersome since the test sentences are generated from a limited set of manual templates or need expensive crowd-sourcing. We propose using ChatGPT for the controllable generation of test sentences, given any arbitrary user-specified combination of social groups and attributes. We present an open-source comprehensive bias testing framework (BiasTestGPT), hosted on HuggingFace, that can be plugged into any open-source PLM for bias testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T22:07:57Z)
• BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering [25.108222728383236]
  It is well documented that NLP models learn social biases present in the world, but little work has been done to show how these biases manifest in actual model outputs for applied tasks like question answering (QA) We introduce the Bias Benchmark for QA (BBQ), a dataset consisting of question-sets constructed by the authors that highlight textitattested social biases against people belonging to protected classes along nine different social dimensions relevant for U.S. English-speaking contexts. We find that models strongly rely on stereotypes when the context is ambiguous, meaning that the model's outputs consistently reproduce harmful biases in this setting
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T16:43:46Z)
• UnQovering Stereotyping Biases via Underspecified Questions [68.81749777034409]
  We present UNQOVER, a framework to probe and quantify biases through underspecified questions. We show that a naive use of model scores can lead to incorrect bias estimates due to two forms of reasoning errors. We use this metric to analyze four important classes of stereotypes: gender, nationality, ethnicity, and religion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T01:49:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.