Multimodal Belief-Space Covariance Steering with Active Probing and Influence for Interactive Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14540v2
• Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 04:59:29 GMT
• Title: Multimodal Belief-Space Covariance Steering with Active Probing and Influence for Interactive Driving
• Abstract summary: We introduce a hierarchical belief model that structures human behavior across coarse discrete intents and fine motion modes.<n>We develop an active probing strategy that identifies when multimodal ambiguity in human predictions may compromise safety.<n>Finally, a runtime risk-evaluation layer based on Conditional Value-at-Risk ensures that all probing actions remain within human risk tolerance during influence.
• Score: 14.159772216001954
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous driving in complex traffic requires reasoning under uncertainty. Common approaches rely on prediction-based planning or risk-aware control, but these are typically treated in isolation, limiting their ability to capture the coupled nature of action and inference in interactive settings. This gap becomes especially critical in uncertain scenarios, where simply reacting to predictions can lead to unsafe maneuvers or overly conservative behavior. Our central insight is that safe interaction requires not only estimating human behavior but also shaping it when ambiguity poses risks. To this end, we introduce a hierarchical belief model that structures human behavior across coarse discrete intents and fine motion modes, updated via Bayesian inference for interpretable multi-resolution reasoning. On top of this, we develop an active probing strategy that identifies when multimodal ambiguity in human predictions may compromise safety and plans disambiguating actions that both reveal intent and gently steer human decisions toward safer outcomes. Finally, a runtime risk-evaluation layer based on Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) ensures that all probing actions remain within human risk tolerance during influence. Our simulations in lane-merging and unsignaled intersection scenarios demonstrate that our approach achieves higher success rates and shorter completion times compared to existing methods. These results highlight the benefit of coupling belief inference, probing, and risk monitoring, yielding a principled and interpretable framework for planning under uncertainty.

Related papers

• Active Interaction-Aware Model Predictive Path Integral via Ego-Conditioned Generative Predictions [15.278521134124077]
  We propose a planning framework that integrates an ego-conditioned generative autoregressive prediction model within Model Predictive Path Integral control.<n>The generative prediction model outputs, multi-modal predictions of surrounding agents conditioned on each of the ego's considered future actions.<n>We show that closed-loop simulations demonstrate improved safety and efficiency compared to conventional predict-then-plan and passive interaction-aware approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T22:51:26Z)
• Bridging Predictive Uncertainty and Safe Action: Sample-Conditioned Differentiable Planning for Autonomous Driving [46.91409391705346]
  Complex, dynamic, and interactive driving environments pose significant challenges for autonomous driving.<n>A fundamental bottleneck in current systems is the disconnect between highly expressive uncertainty modeling and interpretable, safe motion planning.<n>We propose a novel sample-conditioned differentiable planning framework that bridges this gap by explicitly incorporating diffusion-generated future trajectories into the optimization process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T08:10:02Z)
• Action-Conditioned Risk Gating for Safety-Critical Control under Partial Observability [79.08785366532287]
  We propose a lightweight risk-gated reinforcement learning approximation for risk-sensitive control under partial observability.<n>We evaluate the approach in two safety-critical partially observable domains: automated glucose regulation and safety-constrained navigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T01:23:09Z)
• C-CoT: Counterfactual Chain-of-Thought with Vision-Language Models for Safe Autonomous Driving [5.963051368087439]
  We propose a counterfactual chain-of-thought (C-CoT) framework to decompose driving decisions into five sequential stages.<n>Within the counterfactual reasoning stage, we introduce a structured meta-action evaluation tree to explicitly assess the potential consequences of alternative action combinations.<n>This self-reflective reasoning establishes causal links between action choices and safety outcomes, improving robustness in long-tail and out-of-distribution scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T15:45:00Z)
• Risk-Aware World Model Predictive Control for Generalizable End-to-End Autonomous Driving [82.69496624372944]
  "Only driving like the expert" suffers from limited generalization.<n>Can an E2E-AD system make reliable decisions without any expert action supervision?<n>We propose a unified framework named Risk-aware World Model Predictive Control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T17:32:30Z)
• RiskNet: Interaction-Aware Risk Forecasting for Autonomous Driving in Long-Tail Scenarios [6.024186631622774]
  RiskNet is an interaction-aware risk forecasting framework for autonomous vehicles.<n>It integrates deterministic risk modeling with probabilistic behavior prediction for comprehensive risk assessment.<n>It supports real-time, scenario-adaptive risk forecasting and demonstrates strong generalization across uncertain driving environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T02:36:54Z)
• Criticality and Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We seek to define a criticality framework with both a quantifiable ground truth and a clear significance to users.<n>We introduce true criticality as the expected drop in reward when an agent deviates from its policy for n consecutive random actions.<n>We also introduce the concept of proxy criticality, a low-overhead metric that has a statistically monotonic relationship to true criticality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T21:00:45Z)
• On Minimizing Adversarial Counterfactual Error in Adversarial RL [18.044879441434432]
  adversarial noise poses significant risks in safety-critical scenarios.<n>We introduce a novel objective called Adversarial Counterfactual Error (ACoE)<n>Our method significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art approaches for addressing adversarial RL challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T08:14:24Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• Safe Explicable Planning [3.3869539907606603]
  We propose Safe Explicable Planning (SEP) to support the specification of a safety bound. Our approach generalizes the consideration of multiple objectives stemming from multiple models. We provide formal proofs that validate the desired theoretical properties of these methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T21:49:02Z)
• Empirical Estimates on Hand Manipulation are Recoverable: A Step Towards Individualized and Explainable Robotic Support in Everyday Activities [80.37857025201036]
  Key challenge for robotic systems is to figure out the behavior of another agent. Processing correct inferences is especially challenging when (confounding) factors are not controlled experimentally. We propose equipping robots with the necessary tools to conduct observational studies on people.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T22:15:56Z)
• Risk-Constrained Interactive Safety under Behavior Uncertainty for Autonomous Driving [0.0]
  Safety envelopes which restrict the allowed planning region yield interpretable safety under the presence of behavior uncertainty. Humans balance safety and efficiency in dense traffic by accepting a probabilistic risk of violating the safety envelope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T08:33:39Z)
• Risk-Sensitive Sequential Action Control with Multi-Modal Human Trajectory Forecasting for Safe Crowd-Robot Interaction [55.569050872780224]
  We present an online framework for safe crowd-robot interaction based on risk-sensitive optimal control, wherein the risk is modeled by the entropic risk measure. Our modular approach decouples the crowd-robot interaction into learning-based prediction and model-based control. A simulation study and a real-world experiment show that the proposed framework can accomplish safe and efficient navigation while avoiding collisions with more than 50 humans in the scene.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T02:02:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.