Cognitive networks reconstruct mindsets about STEM subjects and educational contexts in almost 1000 high-schoolers, University students and LLM-based digital twins

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14749v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:49:21 GMT
• Title: Cognitive networks reconstruct mindsets about STEM subjects and educational contexts in almost 1000 high-schoolers, University students and LLM-based digital twins
• Authors: Francesco Gariboldi, Emma Franchino, Edith Haim, Gianluca Lattanzi, Alessandro Grecucci, Massimo Stella,
• Abstract summary: We use cognitive network science to reconstruct group mindsets as behavioural forma mentis networks (BFMNs)<n>Across student groups, science and research are consistently framed positively, while their core quantitative subjects exhibit more negative and anxiety related auras.<n>Human networks show greater overlapping between mathematics and anxiety than GPT-oss.
• Score: 35.18016233072556
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Attitudes toward STEM develop from the interaction of conceptual knowledge, educational experiences, and affect. Here we use cognitive network science to reconstruct group mindsets as behavioural forma mentis networks (BFMNs). In this case, nodes are cue words and free associations, edges are empirical associative links, and each concept is annotated with perceived valence. We analyse BFMNs from N = 994 observations spanning high school students, university students, and early-career STEM experts, alongside LLM (GPT-oss) "digital twins" prompted to emulate comparable profiles. Focusing also on semantic neighbourhoods ("frames") around key target concepts (e.g., STEM subjects or educational actors/places), we quantify frames in terms of valence auras, emotional profiles, network overlap (Jaccard similarity), and concreteness relative to null baselines. Across student groups, science and research are consistently framed positively, while their core quantitative subjects (mathematics and statistics) exhibit more negative and anxiety related auras, amplified in higher math-anxiety subgroups, evidencing a STEM-science cognitive and emotional dissonance. High-anxiety frames are also less concrete than chance, suggesting more abstract and decontextualised representations of threatening quantitative domains. Human networks show greater overlapping between mathematics and anxiety than GPT-oss. The results highlight how BFMNs capture cognitive-affective signatures of mindsets towards the target domains and indicate that LLM-based digital twins approximate cultural attitudes but miss key context-sensitive, experience-based components relevant to replicate human educational anxiety.

Related papers

• Toward Cognitive Supersensing in Multimodal Large Language Model [67.15559571626747]
  We introduce Cognitive Supersensing, a training paradigm that endows MLLMs with human-like visual imagery capabilities.<n>In experiments, MLLMs trained with Cognitive Supersensing significantly outperform state-of-the-art baselines on CogSense-Bench.<n>We will open-source the CogSense-Bench and our model weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T02:19:50Z)
• A Brain-like Synergistic Core in LLMs Drives Behaviour and Learning [50.68188138112555]
  We show that large language models spontaneously develop synergistic cores.<n>We find that areas in middle layers exhibit synergistic processing while early and late layers rely on redundancy.<n>This convergence suggests that synergistic information processing is a fundamental property of intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T10:48:35Z)
• Identifying Quantum Structure in AI Language: Evidence for Evolutionary Convergence of Human and Artificial Cognition [0.0]
  We present the results of cognitive tests on conceptual combinations, performed using specific Large Language Models (LLMs) as test subjects.<n>In the first test, performed with ChatGPT and Gemini, we show that Bell's inequalities are significantly violated, which indicates the presence of 'quantum entanglement' in the tested concepts.<n>In the second test, also performed using ChatGPT and Gemini, we identify the presence of 'Bose-Einstein statistics', rather than the intuitively expected 'Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics', in the distribution of the words contained in large-size texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T08:22:49Z)
• Mind Meets Space: Rethinking Agentic Spatial Intelligence from a Neuroscience-inspired Perspective [53.556348738917166]
  Recent advances in agentic AI have led to systems capable of autonomous task execution and language-based reasoning.<n>Human spatial intelligence, rooted in integrated multisensory perception, spatial memory, and cognitive maps, enables flexible, context-aware decision-making in unstructured environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T05:23:22Z)
• Concept-Guided Interpretability via Neural Chunking [64.6429903327095]
  We show that neural networks exhibit patterns in their raw population activity that mirror regularities in the training data.<n>We propose three methods to extract recurring chunks on a neural population level.<n>Our work points to a new direction for interpretability, one that harnesses both cognitive principles and the structure of naturalistic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T13:49:43Z)
• SITE: towards Spatial Intelligence Thorough Evaluation [121.1493852562597]
  Spatial intelligence (SI) represents a cognitive ability encompassing the visualization, manipulation, and reasoning about spatial relationships.<n>We introduce SITE, a benchmark dataset towards SI Thorough Evaluation.<n>Our approach to curating the benchmark combines a bottom-up survey about 31 existing datasets and a top-down strategy drawing upon three classification systems in cognitive science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T17:45:44Z)
• MATHGLANCE: Multimodal Large Language Models Do Not Know Where to Look in Mathematical Diagrams [65.02628814094639]
  Diagrams serve as a fundamental form of visual language, representing complex concepts and their inter-relationships through structured symbols, shapes, and spatial arrangements.<n>Current benchmarks conflate perceptual and reasoning tasks, making it difficult to assess whether Multimodal Large Language Models genuinely understand mathematical diagrams beyond superficial pattern recognition.<n>We introduce MATHGLANCE, a benchmark specifically designed to isolate and evaluate mathematical perception in MLLMs.<n>We construct GeoPeP, a perception-oriented dataset of 200K structured geometry image-text annotated with geometric primitives and precise spatial relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T17:30:41Z)
• Cognitive networks highlight differences and similarities in the STEM mindsets of human and LLM-simulated trainees, experts and academics [0.0]
  This study uses behavioural forma mentis networks to investigate the STEM-focused mindset.<n>Human forma mentis networks exhibited significantly higher clustering coefficients compared to GPT-3.5.<n>Human experts, in particular, demonstrated robust clustering coefficients, reflecting better integration of STEM concepts into their cognitive networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T20:02:51Z)
• Multi-task Collaborative Pre-training and Individual-adaptive-tokens Fine-tuning: A Unified Framework for Brain Representation Learning [3.1453938549636185]
  We propose a unified framework that combines Collaborative pre-training and Individual--Tokens fine-tuning. The proposed MCIAT achieves state-of-the-art diagnosis performance on the ADHD-200 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:38:17Z)
• Network psychometrics and cognitive network science open new ways for detecting, understanding and tackling the complexity of math anxiety: A review [0.0]
  Math anxiety is a clinical pathology impairing cognitive processing in math-related contexts. It affects roughly 20% of students in 63 out of 64 worldwide educational systems but correlates weakly with academic performance. It poses a concrete threat to students' well-being, computational literacy and career prospects in science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T12:43:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.