MATHGLANCE: Multimodal Large Language Models Do Not Know Where to Look in Mathematical Diagrams
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20745v1
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:30:41 GMT
- Title: MATHGLANCE: Multimodal Large Language Models Do Not Know Where to Look in Mathematical Diagrams
- Authors: Yanpeng Sun, Shan Zhang, Wei Tang, Aotian Chen, Piotr Koniusz, Kai Zou, Yuan Xue, Anton van den Hengel,
- Abstract summary: Diagrams serve as a fundamental form of visual language, representing complex concepts and their inter-relationships through structured symbols, shapes, and spatial arrangements.<n>Current benchmarks conflate perceptual and reasoning tasks, making it difficult to assess whether Multimodal Large Language Models genuinely understand mathematical diagrams beyond superficial pattern recognition.<n>We introduce MATHGLANCE, a benchmark specifically designed to isolate and evaluate mathematical perception in MLLMs.<n>We construct GeoPeP, a perception-oriented dataset of 200K structured geometry image-text annotated with geometric primitives and precise spatial relationships.
- Score: 65.02628814094639
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Diagrams serve as a fundamental form of visual language, representing complex concepts and their inter-relationships through structured symbols, shapes, and spatial arrangements. Unlike natural images, their inherently symbolic and abstract nature poses significant challenges for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, current benchmarks conflate perceptual and reasoning tasks, making it difficult to assess whether MLLMs genuinely understand mathematical diagrams beyond superficial pattern recognition. To address this gap, we introduce MATHGLANCE, a benchmark specifically designed to isolate and evaluate mathematical perception in MLLMs. MATHGLANCE comprises 1.2K images and 1.6K carefully curated questions spanning four perception tasks: shape classification, object counting, relationship identification, and object grounding, covering diverse domains including plane geometry, solid geometry, and graphical representations. Our evaluation of MLLMs reveals that their ability to understand diagrams is notably limited, particularly in fine-grained grounding tasks. In response, we construct GeoPeP, a perception-oriented dataset of 200K structured geometry image-text pairs explicitly annotated with geometric primitives and precise spatial relationships. Training MLLM on GeoPeP leads to significant gains in perceptual accuracy, which in turn substantially improves mathematical reasoning. Our benchmark and dataset establish critical standards for evaluating and advancing multimodal mathematical understanding, providing valuable resources and insights to foster future MLLM research.
Related papers
- Enhancing the Geometric Problem-Solving Ability of Multimodal LLMs via Symbolic-Neural Integration [57.95306827012784]
We propose GeoGen, a pipeline that can automatically generate step-wise reasoning paths for geometry diagrams.
By leveraging the precise symbolic reasoning, textbfGeoGen produces large-scale, high-quality question-answer pairs.
We train textbfGeoLogic, a Large Language Model (LLM), using synthetic data generated by GeoGen.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-17T09:13:46Z) - Do Large Language Models Truly Understand Geometric Structures? [15.915781154075615]
We introduce the GeomRel dataset to evaluate large language models' understanding of geometric structures.<n>We propose the Geometry Chain-of-Thought (GeoCoT) method, which enhances LLMs' ability to identify geometric relationships.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-23T15:52:34Z) - MAPS: Advancing Multi-Modal Reasoning in Expert-Level Physical Science [62.96434290874878]
Current Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLM) have shown strong capabilities in general visual reasoning tasks.<n>We develop a new framework, named Multi-Modal Scientific Reasoning with Physics Perception and Simulation (MAPS) based on an MLLM.<n>MAPS decomposes expert-level multi-modal reasoning task into physical diagram understanding via a Physical Perception Model (PPM) and reasoning with physical knowledge via a simulator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-18T13:54:00Z) - Open Eyes, Then Reason: Fine-grained Visual Mathematical Understanding in MLLMs [62.875934732547435]
Current large language models (MLLMs) often underperform on mathematical problem-solving tasks that require fine-grained visual understanding.<n>In this paper, we evaluate the visual grounding capabilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs and reveal a significant negative correlation between visual grounding accuracy and problem-solving performance.<n>We propose a novel approach, SVE-Math, featuring a geometric-grounded vision encoder and a feature router that dynamically adjusts the contribution of hierarchical visual feature maps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-11T04:08:44Z) - GePBench: Evaluating Fundamental Geometric Perception for Multimodal Large Language Models [34.647839550142834]
We introduce GePBench, a novel benchmark designed to assess the geometric perception abilities of MLLMs.<n>Our evaluations reveal that current state-of-the-art MLLMs exhibit significant deficiencies in geometric perception tasks.<n>We show that models trained with GePBench data demonstrate substantial improvements on a wide range of benchmark tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-30T16:01:43Z) - Diagram Formalization Enhanced Multi-Modal Geometry Problem Solver [11.69164802295844]
We introduce a new framework that integrates visual features, geometric formal language, and natural language representations.
We propose a novel synthetic data approach and create a large-scale geometric dataset, SynthGeo228K, annotated with both formal and natural language captions.
Our framework improves MLLMs' ability to process geometric diagrams and extends their application to open-ended tasks on the formalgeo7k dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-06T12:11:06Z) - GeomVerse: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Models for Geometric
Reasoning [17.61621287003562]
We evaluate vision language models (VLMs) along various axes through the lens of geometry problems.
We procedurally create a synthetic dataset of geometry questions with controllable difficulty levels along multiple axes.
The empirical results obtained using our benchmark for state-of-the-art VLMs indicate that these models are not as capable in subjects like geometry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T15:25:39Z) - G-LLaVA: Solving Geometric Problem with Multi-Modal Large Language Model [124.68242155098189]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in human-level reasoning and generation capabilities.
G-LLaVA demonstrates exceptional performance in solving geometric problems, significantly outperforming GPT-4-V on the MathVista benchmark with only 7B parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T17:36:20Z) - MAML and ANIL Provably Learn Representations [60.17417686153103]
We prove that two well-known meta-learning methods, MAML and ANIL, are capable of learning common representation among a set of given tasks.
Specifically, in the well-known multi-task linear representation learning setting, they are able to recover the ground-truth representation at an exponentially fast rate.
Our analysis illuminates that the driving force causing MAML and ANIL to recover the underlying representation is that they adapt the final layer of their model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-07T19:43:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.