Benchmarking Self-Supervised Models for Cardiac Ultrasound View Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15339v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 04:00:16 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Models for Cardiac Ultrasound View Classification
• Authors: Youssef Megahed, Salma I. Megahed, Robin Ducharme, Inok Lee, Adrian D. C. Chan, Mark C. Walker, Steven Hawken,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate and compare two self-supervised learning frameworks, USFMAE, developed by our team, and MoCo v3, on the recently introduced CACTUS dataset (37,736 images) for automated simulated cardiac view (A4C, PL, PSAV, PSMV, Random, and SC) classification.<n>Our results indicate that USF-MAE consistently outperforms MoCo v3 across metrics.
• Score: 0.19544534628180868
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reliable interpretation of cardiac ultrasound images is essential for accurate clinical diagnosis and assessment. Self-supervised learning has shown promise in medical imaging by leveraging large unlabelled datasets to learn meaningful representations. In this study, we evaluate and compare two self-supervised learning frameworks, USF-MAE, developed by our team, and MoCo v3, on the recently introduced CACTUS dataset (37,736 images) for automated simulated cardiac view (A4C, PL, PSAV, PSMV, Random, and SC) classification. Both models used 5-fold cross-validation, enabling robust assessment of generalization performance across multiple random splits. The CACTUS dataset provides expert-annotated cardiac ultrasound images with diverse views. We adopt an identical training protocol for both models to ensure a fair comparison. Both models are configured with a learning rate of 0.0001 and a weight decay of 0.01. For each fold, we record performance metrics including ROC-AUC, accuracy, F1-score, and recall. Our results indicate that USF-MAE consistently outperforms MoCo v3 across metrics. The average testing AUC for USF-MAE is 99.99% (+/-0.01% 95% CI), compared to 99.97% (+/-0.01%) for MoCo v3. USF-MAE achieves a mean testing accuracy of 99.33% (+/-0.18%), higher than the 98.99% (+/-0.28%) reported for MoCo v3. Similar trends are observed for the F1-score and recall, with improvements statistically significant across folds (paired t-test, p=0.0048 < 0.01). This proof-of-concept analysis suggests that USF-MAE learns more discriminative features for cardiac view classification than MoCo v3 when applied to this dataset. The enhanced performance across multiple metrics highlights the potential of USF-MAE for improving automated cardiac ultrasound classification.

Related papers

• Automated Classification of First-Trimester Fetal Heart Views Using Ultrasound-Specific Self-Supervised Learning [0.205246094017924]
  We evaluate a self-supervised ultrasound foundation model, USF-MAE, for first-trimester fetal heart view classification.<n> USF-MAE is pretrained using masked autoencoding modelling on more than 370,000 unlabelled ultrasound images.<n>It achieved the highest performance across all evaluation metrics, with 90.57% accuracy, 91.15% precision, 90.57% recall, and 90.71% F1-score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T22:24:26Z)
• Improved cystic hygroma detection from prenatal imaging using ultrasound-specific self-supervised representation learning [0.18058404137575482]
  Cystic hygroma is a high-risk prenatal ultrasound finding that portends high rates of chromosomal abnormalities, structural malformations, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.<n>This study assesses whether ultrasound-specific self-supervised pretraining can facilitate accurate, robust deep learning detection of cystic hygroma in first-trimester ultrasound images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T00:07:26Z)
• Deep learning-based segmentation of T1 and T2 cardiac MRI maps for automated disease detection [0.2593137041747032]
  Tissue mapping enables quantitative cardiac tissue characterization but is limited by interobserver variability during manual delineation.<n>Traditional approaches relying on average relaxation values and single cutoffs may oversimplify complexity.<n>This study evaluates whether machine learning can achieve segmentation accuracy comparable to inter-observer variability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T16:08:54Z)
• Brain Tumor Classification on MRI in Light of Molecular Markers [56.99710477905796]
  Co-deletion of the 1p/19q gene is associated with clinical outcomes in low-grade gliomas.<n>This study aims to utilize a specially MRI-based convolutional neural network for brain cancer detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T07:04:26Z)
• A Federated Learning Framework for Stenosis Detection [70.27581181445329]
  This study explores the use of Federated Learning (FL) for stenosis detection in coronary angiography images (CA) Two heterogeneous datasets from two institutions were considered: dataset 1 includes 1219 images from 200 patients, which we acquired at the Ospedale Riuniti of Ancona (Italy) dataset 2 includes 7492 sequential images from 90 patients from a previous study available in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T11:13:40Z)
• Vision Transformer for Efficient Chest X-ray and Gastrointestinal Image Classification [2.3293678240472517]
  This study uses different CNNs and transformer-based methods with a wide range of data augmentation techniques. We evaluated their performance on three medical image datasets from different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T04:07:03Z)
• Attention-based Saliency Maps Improve Interpretability of Pneumothorax Classification [52.77024349608834]
  To investigate chest radiograph (CXR) classification performance of vision transformers (ViT) and interpretability of attention-based saliency. ViTs were fine-tuned for lung disease classification using four public data sets: CheXpert, Chest X-Ray 14, MIMIC CXR, and VinBigData. ViTs had comparable CXR classification AUCs compared with state-of-the-art CNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T12:05:41Z)
• Self-supervised contrastive learning of echocardiogram videos enables label-efficient cardiac disease diagnosis [48.64462717254158]
  We developed a self-supervised contrastive learning approach, EchoCLR, to catered to echocardiogram videos. When fine-tuned on small portions of labeled data, EchoCLR pretraining significantly improved classification performance for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and aortic stenosis (AS) EchoCLR is unique in its ability to learn representations of medical videos and demonstrates that SSL can enable label-efficient disease classification from small, labeled datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T19:17:26Z)
• Vision Transformers for femur fracture classification [59.99241204074268]
  The Vision Transformer (ViT) was able to correctly predict 83% of the test images. Good results were obtained in sub-fractures with the largest and richest dataset ever.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-07T10:12:42Z)
• Deep learning-based COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest CT images: model generalizability [54.86482395312936]
  Deep learning (DL) classification models were trained to identify COVID-19-positive patients on 3D computed tomography (CT) datasets from different countries. We trained nine identical DL-based classification models by using combinations of the datasets with a 72% train, 8% validation, and 20% test data split. The models trained on multiple datasets and evaluated on a test set from one of the datasets used for training performed better.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T21:14:52Z)
• How well do U-Net-based segmentation trained on adult cardiac magnetic resonance imaging data generalise to rare congenital heart diseases for surgical planning? [2.330464988780586]
  Planning the optimal time of intervention for pulmonary valve replacement surgery in patients with the congenital heart disease Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is mainly based on ventricular volume and function according to current guidelines. In several grand challenges in the last years, U-Net architectures have shown impressive results on the provided data. However, in clinical practice, data sets are more diverse considering individual pathologies and image properties derived from different scanner properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T08:50:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.