EarthSpatialBench: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs on Earth Imagery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15918v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 06:08:43 GMT
• Title: EarthSpatialBench: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs on Earth Imagery
• Abstract summary: Existing benchmarks for Earth imagery primarily focus on 2D spatial grounding, image captioning, and coarse spatial relations.<n>We propose textbfEarthSpatialBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating spatial reasoning in MLLMs on Earth imagery.<n>The benchmark contains over 325K question-answer pairs spanning: (1) qualitative and quantitative reasoning about spatial distance and direction; (2) systematic topological relations; (3) single-object queries, object-pair queries, and compositional aggregate group queries; and (4) object references expressed via textual descriptions, visual overlays, and explicit geometry coordinates, including 2D bounding boxes, polylines, and polygons
• Score: 16.896854321525918
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Benchmarking spatial reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has attracted growing interest in computer vision due to its importance for embodied AI and other agentic systems that require precise interaction with the physical world. However, spatial reasoning on Earth imagery has lagged behind, as it uniquely involves grounding objects in georeferenced images and quantitatively reasoning about distances, directions, and topological relations using both visual cues and vector geometry coordinates (e.g., 2D bounding boxes, polylines, and polygons). Existing benchmarks for Earth imagery primarily focus on 2D spatial grounding, image captioning, and coarse spatial relations (e.g., simple directional or proximity cues). They lack support for quantitative direction and distance reasoning, systematic topological relations, and complex object geometries beyond bounding boxes. To fill this gap, we propose \textbf{EarthSpatialBench}, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating spatial reasoning in MLLMs on Earth imagery. The benchmark contains over 325K question-answer pairs spanning: (1) qualitative and quantitative reasoning about spatial distance and direction; (2) systematic topological relations; (3) single-object queries, object-pair queries, and compositional aggregate group queries; and (4) object references expressed via textual descriptions, visual overlays, and explicit geometry coordinates, including 2D bounding boxes, polylines, and polygons. We conducted extensive experiments on both open-source and proprietary models to identify limitations in the spatial reasoning of MLLMs.

Related papers

• GeoAnchor: Collaborative Reasoning via Latent Decomposition for 3D Spatial Understanding [45.67186918674009]
  GeoAnchor is an interleaved text-latent reasoning framework for 3D spatial relationships.<n>It decomposes 3D spatial information into three complementary components: position latents for object grounding, direction latents for relational orientation, and geometry latents for scene structure.<n>Experiments on diverse and complex 3D reasoning tasks demonstrate that GeoAnchor outperforms the state of the art, validating its effectiveness and generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T05:27:37Z)
• G$^2$TAM: Geometry Grounded Track Anything Model [49.05553245076823]
  We propose a unified framework for promptable instance tracking in 3D using only unordered RGB images or videos.<n>G$2$TAM employs spatially aligned geometric representations as implicit memory, ensuring stable instance identity and localization across frames and views.<n>At its core is a cross-modal spatial encoder that integrates visual and textual prompts into a shared geometric space, enabling end-to-end spatial reconstruction and instance-consistent mask prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-04T09:32:13Z)
• OmniView-Space: Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning via Multi-Perspective Spatial Mapping [69.48762031013514]
  We propose OmniView-Space, a framework designed to maintain spatial consistency through multimodal egocentric evidence.<n>Our approach consists of three core components: (1) Multi-Perspective Spatial Mapping (MPSM), which re-anchors reconstructed geometry into a query-aligned visual cognitive map and a textual spatial graph; (2) Tool-Guided Egocentric Reasoning, an interleaved policy trained to actively select the ego anchor required by the query and request the corresponding MPSM evidence; and (3) Cognitive-Map Distillation, which uses MPSM-generated trajectories and ego-frame rewards to train the model to reason with self-generated cognitive maps
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T12:45:12Z)
• TerraScope: Pixel-Grounded Visual Reasoning for Earth Observation [71.39112735716172]
  We introduce TerraScope, a unified vision-language model that delivers pixel-grounded geospatial reasoning.<n>We also propose TerraScope-Bench, the first benchmark for pixel-grounded geospatial reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T15:38:02Z)
• Thinking with Geometry: Active Geometry Integration for Spatial Reasoning [68.59084007360615]
  We propose GeoThinker, a framework that shifts paradigm passive fusion to active perception.<n>Instead of feature mixing, GeoThinker enables the model to selectively retrieve geometric evidence conditioned on its internal reasoning demands.<n>Our results indicate that the ability to actively integrate spatial structures is essential for next-generation spatial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T18:59:32Z)
• Seeing through Imagination: Learning Scene Geometry via Implicit Spatial World Modeling [68.14113731953971]
  This paper introduces MILO, an Implicit spatIaL wOrld modeling paradigm that simulates human-like imagination.<n>We show that our approach significantly enhances spatial reasoning capabilities across multiple baselines and benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T16:01:41Z)
• Video2Layout: Recall and Reconstruct Metric-Grounded Cognitive Map for Spatial Reasoning [19.549136366694572]
  Video2 is a framework for reconstructing metric-grounded spatial layouts from video.<n>The framework employs continuous object boundary coordinates to quantify inter-object physical and object size.<n>Our model, V2LO-7B, achieves an average improvement of 4.92% over the model trained on grid maps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T08:57:14Z)
• DynaSolidGeo: A Dynamic Benchmark for Genuine Spatial Mathematical Reasoning of VLMs in Solid Geometry [21.08408074777344]
  DynaSolidGeo is a benchmark for evaluating genuine spatial reasoning in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>It contains 503 expert-curated seed questions that can, in principle, dynamically generate an unbounded number of diverse multimodal text-visual instances.<n>We incorporate process evaluation based on expert-annotated reasoning chains to measure logical validity and causal coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-25T15:49:45Z)
• GRACE: Estimating Geometry-level 3D Human-Scene Contact from 2D Images [54.602947113980655]
  Estimating the geometry level of human-scene contact aims to ground specific contact surface points at 3D human geometries.<n> GRACE (Geometry-level Reasoning for 3D Human-scene Contact Estimation) is a new paradigm for 3D human contact estimation.<n>It incorporates a point cloud encoder-decoder architecture along with a hierarchical feature extraction and fusion module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T09:25:46Z)
• MATHGLANCE: Multimodal Large Language Models Do Not Know Where to Look in Mathematical Diagrams [65.02628814094639]
  Diagrams serve as a fundamental form of visual language, representing complex concepts and their inter-relationships through structured symbols, shapes, and spatial arrangements.<n>Current benchmarks conflate perceptual and reasoning tasks, making it difficult to assess whether Multimodal Large Language Models genuinely understand mathematical diagrams beyond superficial pattern recognition.<n>We introduce MATHGLANCE, a benchmark specifically designed to isolate and evaluate mathematical perception in MLLMs.<n>We construct GeoPeP, a perception-oriented dataset of 200K structured geometry image-text annotated with geometric primitives and precise spatial relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T17:30:41Z)
• Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
  We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning.<n>We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z)
• Space3D-Bench: Spatial 3D Question Answering Benchmark [49.259397521459114]
  We present Space3D-Bench - a collection of 1000 general spatial questions and answers related to scenes of the Replica dataset. We provide an assessment system that grades natural language responses based on predefined ground-truth answers. Finally, we introduce a baseline called RAG3D-Chat integrating the world understanding of foundation models with rich context retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T16:05:22Z)
• Benchmarking Spatial Relationships in Text-to-Image Generation [102.62422723894232]
  We investigate the ability of text-to-image models to generate correct spatial relationships among objects. We present VISOR, an evaluation metric that captures how accurately the spatial relationship described in text is generated in the image. Our experiments reveal a surprising finding that, although state-of-the-art T2I models exhibit high image quality, they are severely limited in their ability to generate multiple objects or the specified spatial relations between them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T06:03:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.