Retrieving the Baby: Reichenbach's Principle, Bell Locality, and Selection Bias

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16985v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 01:06:54 GMT
• Title: Retrieving the Baby: Reichenbach's Principle, Bell Locality, and Selection Bias
• Authors: Huw Price,
• Abstract summary: John Bell describes the steps from an intuitive, informal principle of locality to a mathematical rule called Factorizability.<n>Bell shows that Factorizability conflicts with predictions of QM, predictions since confirmed in many experiments.<n>Here we retrieve and identify it: it is selection bias.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In his late piece 'La nouvelle cuisine' (Bell 1990), John Bell describes the steps from an intuitive, informal principle of locality to a mathematical rule called Factorizability. This rule stipulates that when possible past causes are held fixed, the joint probabilities of outcomes of spacelike separated measurements, conditional on measurement settings, be the product of the local conditional probabilities individually. Bell shows that Factorizability conflicts with predictions of QM, predictions since confirmed in many experiments. However, Bell warns his readers that the steps leading to Factorizability should 'be viewed with the utmost suspicion'. He says that 'it is precisely in cleaning up intuitive ideas for mathematics that one is likely to throw the baby out with the bathwater' (1990, 239). Bell's suspicions were well-founded, for he himself misses an important baby. Here we retrieve and identify it: it is selection bias. We explain how failure of Factorizability may be regarded as a selection artefact, requiring no violation of locality in the intuitive, conceptual sense with which Bell begins his analysis. The argument begins with a central principle of causal discovery, Reichenbach's Principle of Common Cause (PCC). It is well known that correlations due to selection bias are not subject to PCC. Several writers have proposed that EPR-Bell correlations are also an exception to PCC, but it has not been noticed that they fall under this well-known exclusion. The point is relevant not only to the status of Bell nonlocality, but also for statistics and causal modeling. For these fields, the news is that selection effects play a ubiquitous role in quantum phenomena, in a form akin to collider bias.

Related papers

• A relational critique of Bell locality [0.0]
  This paper provides a systematic analysis of Bell experiments from the perspective of quantum mechanics.<n>We show that when Bell experiments are properly analysed through individual observer accounts, all measurements remain strictly local.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T10:53:29Z)
• Bell vs Bell: a ding-dong battle over quantum incompleteness [0.0]
  John Bell gave the first demonstration that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden variables. This paper aims to bring clarity to the debate via simple examples and rigorous results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T11:11:28Z)
• Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
  Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed. In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z)
• Bell's theorem is an exercise in the statistical theory of causality [0.0]
  I derive the Bell-CHSH inequalities as an result in the present-day theory of statistical causality based on graphical models or Bayes' nets. Case of contextual setting-dependent hidden variables is covered, despite recent claims that Bell's conclusions can be circumvented in this way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T13:47:08Z)
• Kupczynski's Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are constrained by Bell's theorem [0.0]
  Kupczynski has argued that Bell's theorem can be circumvented if one takes correct account of contextual setting-dependent parameters describing measuring instruments. We show that this is not true. Even if one takes account of contextuality in the way he suggests, the Bell-CHSH inequality can still be derived.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-21T17:44:30Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Experimentally adjudicating between different causal accounts of Bell inequality violations via statistical model selection [0.0]
  Bell inequalities follow from a set of seemingly natural assumptions about how to provide a causal model of a Bell experiment. Two types of causal models that modify some of these assumptions have been proposed. We seek to adjudicate between these alternatives based on their predictive power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T19:33:02Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics' predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
  Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic. "Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected. "Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z)
• Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
  An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false. The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z)
• Quantum-like modeling of the order effect in decision making: POVM viewpoint on the Wang-Busemeyer QQ-equality [77.34726150561087]
  Wang and Busemeyer invented a quantum model and approach as well as non-parametric equality (so-called QQ-equality) This note is to test the possibility to expand the Wang-Busemeyer model by considering questions which are mathematically represented by positive operator valued measures. But, we also showed that, in principle, it is possible to reduce expanded model to the original Wang-Busemeyer model by expanding the context of the questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-10-31T18:11:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.