Security at the Border? The Lived Experiences of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17280v1
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 11:30:35 GMT
- Title: Security at the Border? The Lived Experiences of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK
- Authors: Arshia Dutta, Rikke Bjerg Jensen,
- Abstract summary: We show how some asylum seekers and refugees arriving in the UK experience border control and wider immigration systems.<n>Our findings show how the first meeting with the border, combined with a 'hostile' immigration system, has a longer-term impact on their sense of belonging.
- Score: 6.703429330486276
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: We bring to light how some asylum seekers and refugees arriving in the UK experience border control and wider immigration systems, as well as the impact that these have on their subsequent lives in the UK. We do so through participant observation in a support organisation and interviews with caseworkers, asylum seekers and refugees. Specifically, our findings show how the first meeting with the border, combined with a 'hostile' immigration system, has a longer-term impact on their sense of belonging. Our observations highlight feelings of insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty that accompanied participants' experiences with immigration systems and processes. We contribute to the growing body of HCI scholarship on the tensions between immigration and (security) technology. In so doing, we point to future directions for participatory and collaborative design practices that centre on the lived experiences and everyday security of asylum seekers and refugees.
Related papers
- Frontier AI Auditing: Toward Rigorous Third-Party Assessment of Safety and Security Practices at Leading AI Companies [57.521647436515785]
We define frontier AI auditing as rigorous third-party verification of frontier AI developers' safety and security claims.<n>We introduce AI Assurance Levels (AAL-1 to AAL-4), ranging from time-bounded system audits to continuous, deception-resilient verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T18:44:09Z) - International Students and Scams: At Risk Abroad [13.445752079381869]
International students (IntlS) in the US refer to foreign students who acquire student visas to study in the US, primarily in higher education.<n>As IntlS arrive in the US, they face several challenges, such as adjusting to a new country and culture, securing housing remotely, and arranging finances for tuition and personal expenses.<n>Recent events such as visa revocations and the cessation of new visas, compound IntlS' risk of being targeted by and falling victim to online scams.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T15:16:28Z) - Oyster-I: Beyond Refusal -- Constructive Safety Alignment for Responsible Language Models [93.5740266114488]
Constructive Safety Alignment (CSA) protects against malicious misuse while actively guiding vulnerable users toward safe and helpful results.<n>Oy1 achieves state-of-the-art safety among open models while retaining high general capabilities.<n>We release Oy1, code, and the benchmark to support responsible, user-centered AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T03:04:27Z) - A Systematic Review of Security Communication Strategies: Guidelines and Open Challenges [47.205801464292485]
We identify user difficulties including information overload, technical comprehension, and balancing security awareness with comfort.<n>Our findings reveal consistent communication paradoxes: users require technical details for credibility yet struggle with jargon and need risk awareness without experiencing anxiety.<n>This work contributes to more effective security communication practices that enable users to recognize and respond to cybersecurity threats appropriately.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T20:18:38Z) - Multimodal Situational Safety [73.63981779844916]
We present the first evaluation and analysis of a novel safety challenge termed Multimodal Situational Safety.<n>For an MLLM to respond safely, whether through language or action, it often needs to assess the safety implications of a language query within its corresponding visual context.<n>We develop the Multimodal Situational Safety benchmark (MSSBench) to assess the situational safety performance of current MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T16:16:07Z) - A Chatbot for Asylum-Seeking Migrants in Europe [14.060846768281705]
ACME aims to help migrants identify the highest level of protection they can apply for.<n>This would contribute to a more sustainable migration by reducing the load on territorial commissions, Courts, and humanitarian organizations supporting asylum applicants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T11:53:40Z) - PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safety [70.84902425123406]
Multi-agent systems, when enhanced with Large Language Models (LLMs), exhibit profound capabilities in collective intelligence.
However, the potential misuse of this intelligence for malicious purposes presents significant risks.
We propose a framework (PsySafe) grounded in agent psychology, focusing on identifying how dark personality traits in agents can lead to risky behaviors.
Our experiments reveal several intriguing phenomena, such as the collective dangerous behaviors among agents, agents' self-reflection when engaging in dangerous behavior, and the correlation between agents' psychological assessments and dangerous behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T12:11:55Z) - Investigating Concerns of Security and Privacy Among Rohingya Refugees
in Malaysia [3.706222947143855]
Rohingya refugees are a stateless Muslim minority group in Myanmar.
They were forced to flee their homes after conflict broke out.
Others migrated to Malaysia and those who arrive there live within the community as urban refugees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T08:14:41Z) - Towards Safer Generative Language Models: A Survey on Safety Risks,
Evaluations, and Improvements [76.80453043969209]
This survey presents a framework for safety research pertaining to large models.
We begin by introducing safety issues of wide concern, then delve into safety evaluation methods for large models.
We explore the strategies for enhancing large model safety from training to deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-18T09:32:55Z) - Information Sources and Anxiety among Refugees in Kenya during COVID-19 [0.0]
Social distancing requirements disrupt traditional in-person communication.
Differences in media types and information sources may be related to anxieties arising from the virus.
We examine these relationships with survey data from 1,000 refugees living in both camps and non-camp settings in Kenya.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-23T05:08:51Z) - Conservative Safety Critics for Exploration [120.73241848565449]
We study the problem of safe exploration in reinforcement learning (RL)
We learn a conservative safety estimate of environment states through a critic.
We show that the proposed approach can achieve competitive task performance while incurring significantly lower catastrophic failure rates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-27T17:54:25Z) - Migration and Refugee Crisis: a Critical Analysis of Online Public
Perception [2.9005223064604078]
The migration rate and the level of resentments towards migrants are an important issue in modern civilisation.
We analyse sentiment and the associated context of expressions in a vast collection of tweets related to the EU refugee crisis.
Our study reveals a marginally higher proportion of negative sentiments vis-a-vis migrants and a large proportion of the negative sentiments is more reflected among the ordinary users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-20T02:04:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.