Information Sources and Anxiety among Refugees in Kenya during COVID-19

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09935v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 05:08:51 GMT
• Title: Information Sources and Anxiety among Refugees in Kenya during COVID-19
• Authors: Matthew A. McGee, Carleen Maitland and Dorothy Njoroge
• Abstract summary: Social distancing requirements disrupt traditional in-person communication. Differences in media types and information sources may be related to anxieties arising from the virus. We examine these relationships with survey data from 1,000 refugees living in both camps and non-camp settings in Kenya.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In the COVID-19 pandemic, refugees' access to information has become increasingly important given the rapid change in the scientific and public health knowledge-base. However, this access is complicated by social distancing requirements that disrupt traditional in-person communication. Many refugees must then rely on alternative information sources to stay informed. Differences in media types and information sources in turn may be related to anxieties arising from the virus and perceptions of others' adherence to recommended protective behaviors. We examine these relationships with survey data from 1,000 refugees living in both camps and non-camp settings in Kenya. Using logit models, we test relationships between information source and anxiety and the effect of these variables on refugees' expected behaviors of community members. Our primary contributions include the finding that information sources consistently exacerbate (e.g., Facebook) or ameliorate (e.g., news from the internet) different anxieties, or can have mixed effects (e.g., radio). We also find that anxiety and information have significant impacts on refugees' expectations of compliance by others and that, whether between camps or between camps and non-camp locales, findings vary by location. Our results have implications for refugee media and infectious disease anxiety scholarship as well as for managing infectious disease response.

Related papers

• News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
  This study investigated information consumption in four European countries. It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z)
• Coronavirus statistics causes emotional bias: a social media text mining perspective [4.042350304426975]
  This paper proposes a deep learning model which classifies texts related to the pandemic from text data with place labels. Next, it conducts a sentiment analysis based on multi-task learning. Finally, it carries out a fixed-effect panel regression with outputs of the sentiment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T03:36:13Z)
• Taking a Language Detour: How International Migrants Speaking a Minority Language Seek COVID-Related Information in Their Host Countries [24.55750970846402]
  The current paper presents an interview study with two cohorts of Chinese migrants living in Japan and the United States. Our data indicated that participants often took language detours, or visits to Mandarin resources for information about the COVID outbreak in their host countries. We discussed solutions to improve international migrants' COVID-related information seeking in their non-native language and cultural environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T03:28:48Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Know it to Defeat it: Exploring Health Rumor Characteristics and Debunking Efforts on Chinese Social Media during COVID-19 Crisis [65.74516068984232]
  We conduct a comprehensive analysis of four months of rumor-related online discussion during COVID-19 on Weibo, a Chinese microblogging site. Results suggest that the dread (cause fear) type of health rumors provoked significantly more discussions and lasted longer than the wish (raise hope) type. We show the efficacy of debunking in suppressing rumor discussions, which is time-sensitive and varies across rumor types and debunkers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-25T14:02:29Z)
• Misinformation, Believability, and Vaccine Acceptance Over 40 Countries: Takeaways From the Initial Phase of The COVID-19 Infodemic [11.737540072863405]
  This paper presents findings from a global survey on the extent of worldwide exposure to the COVID-19 infodemic. We find a strong association between perceived believability of misinformation and vaccination hesitancy. We discuss implications of our findings on public campaigns that proactively spread accurate information to countries that are more susceptible to the infodemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T05:09:25Z)
• Challenges and Opportunities in Rapid Epidemic Information Propagation with Live Knowledge Aggregation from Social Media [2.4181367387692947]
  Social media can complement physical test data due to faster and higher coverage, but they present a different challenge: significant amounts of noise, misinformation and disinformation. We apply evidence-based knowledge acquisition approach to collect, filter, and update live knowledge through the integration of social media sources with authoritative sources. We describe the EDNA/LITMUS tools that implement EBKA, integrating social media such as Twitter and Facebook with authoritative sources such as WHO and CDC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T04:15:44Z)
• Migration and Refugee Crisis: a Critical Analysis of Online Public Perception [2.9005223064604078]
  The migration rate and the level of resentments towards migrants are an important issue in modern civilisation. We analyse sentiment and the associated context of expressions in a vast collection of tweets related to the EU refugee crisis. Our study reveals a marginally higher proportion of negative sentiments vis-a-vis migrants and a large proportion of the negative sentiments is more reflected among the ordinary users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-20T02:04:01Z)
• Cross-lingual Transfer Learning for COVID-19 Outbreak Alignment [90.12602012910465]
  We train on Italy's early COVID-19 outbreak through Twitter and transfer to several other countries. Our experiments show strong results with up to 0.85 Spearman correlation in cross-country predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T02:04:25Z)
• COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
  Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.