Finding the Signal in the Noise: An Exploratory Study on Assessing the Effectiveness of AI and Accessibility Forums for Blind Users' Support Needs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18623v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 21:29:18 GMT
• Title: Finding the Signal in the Noise: An Exploratory Study on Assessing the Effectiveness of AI and Accessibility Forums for Blind Users' Support Needs
• Abstract summary: We interviewed 14 blind users who regularly engage with forums and GenAI tools.<n>Findings revealed that forums often overwhelm users with multiple overlapping topics.<n>GenAI tools, while offering more direct assistance, introduce new barriers by producing unreliable answers.
• Score: 14.757509817838965
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Accessibility forums and, more recently, generative AI tools have become vital resources for blind users seeking solutions to computer-interaction issues and learning about new assistive technologies, screen reader features, tutorials, and software updates. Understanding user experiences with these resources is essential for identifying and addressing persistent support gaps. Towards this, we interviewed 14 blind users who regularly engage with forums and GenAI tools. Findings revealed that forums often overwhelm users with multiple overlapping topics, redundant or irrelevant content, and fragmented responses that must be mentally pieced together, increasing cognitive load. GenAI tools, while offering more direct assistance, introduce new barriers by producing unreliable answers, including overly verbose or fragmented guidance, fabricated information, and contradictory suggestions that fail to follow prompts, thereby heightening verification demands. Based on these insights, we outlined design opportunities to improve the reliability of assistive resources, aiming to provide blind users with more trustworthy and cognitively-manageable support.

Related papers

• Explainable AI for Blind and Low-Vision Users: Navigating Trust, Modality, and Interpretability in the Agentic Era [0.9741676285072485]
  For blind and low-vision (BLV) users, the lack of accessible explanations creates a fundamental barrier to the independent use of AI-driven assistive technologies.<n>This paper investigates the unique XAI requirements of the BLV community through a comprehensive analysis of user interviews and contemporary research.<n> Empirical evidence suggests that while BLV users highly value conversational explanations, they frequently experience "self-blame" for AI failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T19:39:52Z)
• MetaCues: Enabling Critical Engagement with Generative AI for Information Seeking and Sensemaking [7.495555759291]
  We developed a novel GenAI-based interactive tool for information seeking that delivers metacognitive cues alongside AI responses and a note-taking interface to guide users' search and associated learning.<n>Preliminary findings regarding participants' search behavior show that MetaCues leads to increased confidence in attitudinal judgments about the search topic as well as broader inquiry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T04:34:19Z)
• FeedAIde: Guiding App Users to Submit Rich Feedback Reports by Asking Context-Aware Follow-Up Questions [6.85181982998051]
  We propose FeedAIde, a context-aware, interactive feedback approach.<n>FeedAIde captures contextual information, such as the screenshot where the issue emerges.<n>It uses it for adaptive follow-up questions to collaboratively refine with the user a rich feedback report.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T16:31:55Z)
• Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users [8.54162000547885]
  We show how users can customize visual question answering (VQA) tools with a real-world conversational VQA system.<n>The system lacked verbosity controls, was limited in estimating distance in space and time, relied on inaccessible image framing, and offered little to no camera guidance.<n>We discuss how customization techniques such as prompt engineering can help participants work around these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T22:44:43Z)
• PromptHelper: A Prompt Recommender System for Encouraging Creativity in AI Chatbot Interactions [19.138748420166557]
  We introduce prompt recommender systems (PRS) as an interaction approach that supports exploration, suggesting contextually relevant follow-up prompts.<n>We present PromptHelper, a PRS prototype integrated into an AI chatbots that surfaces semantically diverse prompt suggestions while users work on real writing tasks.<n>Results show that PromptHelper significantly increases users' perceived exploration and expressiveness without increasing cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T01:44:51Z)
• Embracing Trustworthy Brain-Agent Collaboration as Paradigm Extension for Intelligent Assistive Technologies [51.93721053301417]
  This paper argues that the field is poised for a paradigm extension from Brain-Computer Interfaces to Brain-Agent Collaboration.<n>We emphasize reframing agents as active and collaborative partners for intelligent assistance rather than passive brain signal data processors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-25T00:25:45Z)
• WebWatcher: Breaking New Frontier of Vision-Language Deep Research Agent [68.3311163530321]
  Web agents such as Deep Research have demonstrated cognitive abilities, capable of solving highly challenging information-seeking problems.<n>This makes multimodal Deep Research highly challenging, as such agents require much stronger reasoning abilities in perception, logic, knowledge.<n>We introduce WebWatcher, a multi-modal Agent for Deep Research equipped with enhanced visual-language reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T18:03:50Z)
• Enhancing Discoverability in Enterprise Conversational Systems with Proactive Question Suggestions [5.356008176627551]
  This paper proposes a framework to enhance question suggestions in conversational enterprise AI systems.<n>Our approach combines periodic user intent analysis at the population level with chat session-based question generation.<n>We evaluate the framework using real-world data from the AI Assistant for Adobe Experience Platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-14T19:04:16Z)
• Challenges in Human-Agent Communication [55.53932430345333]
  We identify and analyze twelve key communication challenges that these systems pose.<n>These include challenges in conveying information from the agent to the user, challenges in enabling the user to convey information to the agent, and overarching challenges that need to be considered across all human-agent communication.<n>Our findings serve as an urgent call for new design patterns, principles, and guidelines to support transparency and control in these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T01:21:26Z)
• Can Users Detect Biases or Factual Errors in Generated Responses in Conversational Information-Seeking? [13.790574266700006]
  We investigate the limitations of response generation in conversational information-seeking systems. The study addresses the problem of query answerability and the challenge of response incompleteness. Our analysis reveals that it is easier for users to detect response incompleteness than query answerability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T20:55:00Z)
• Decoding the Digital Fine Print: Navigating the potholes in Terms of service/ use of GenAI tools against the emerging need for Transparent and Trustworthy Tech Futures [0.0]
  The research investigates the crucial role of clear and intelligible terms of service in cultivating user trust and facilitating informed decision-making in the context of AI, in specific GenAI. It highlights the obstacles presented by complex legal terminology and detailed fine print, which impede genuine user consent and recourse. Findings indicate inconsistencies and variability in document quality, signaling a pressing demand for uniformity in disclosure practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T04:54:53Z)
• Are Akpans Trick or Treat: Unveiling Helpful Biases in Assistant Systems [55.09907990139756]
  Information-seeking AI assistant systems aim to answer users' queries about knowledge in a timely manner.<n>In this paper, we study computational measurements of helpfulness.<n> Experiments with state-of-the-art dialogue systems reveal that existing systems tend to be more helpful for questions regarding concepts from highly-developed countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T07:58:38Z)
• Bringing Cognitive Augmentation to Web Browsing Accessibility [69.62988485669146]
  We explore opportunities brought by cognitive augmentation to provide a more natural and accessible web browsing experience. We develop a conceptual framework for supporting BVIP conversational web browsing needs. We describe our early work and prototype that leverages that consider structural and content features only.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T14:40:52Z)
• On the Social and Technical Challenges of Web Search Autosuggestion Moderation [118.47867428272878]
  Autosuggestions are typically generated by machine learning (ML) systems trained on a corpus of search logs and document representations. While current search engines have become increasingly proficient at suppressing such problematic suggestions, there are still persistent issues that remain. We discuss several dimensions of problematic suggestions, difficult issues along the pipeline, and why our discussion applies to the increasing number of applications beyond web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T19:22:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.