Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation as a Cooperative Decision-Making Problem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18734v1
• Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 06:32:36 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation as a Cooperative Decision-Making Problem
• Authors: Lichang Song, Ting Long, Yi Chang,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has demonstrated strong effectiveness in knowledge-intensive tasks by grounding language in external evidence.<n>We reformulate RAG as a cooperative multi-agent decision-making problem and propose Cooperative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CoRAG)<n> Experimental results demonstrate good generalization and improved generation stability of CoRAG, even when the model is trained on only around 10K PopQA samples.
• Score: 15.007187007351055
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has demonstrated strong effectiveness in knowledge-intensive tasks by grounding language generation in external evidence. Despite its success, many existing RAG systems are built based on a ranking-centric, asymmetric dependency paradigm, where the generation quality of the generator is highly dependent on reranking results of the reranker. To overcome this limitation, we reformulate RAG as a cooperative multi-agent decision-making problem and propose Cooperative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CoRAG), a framework in which the reranker and the generator act as peer decision-makers rather than being connected through an asymmetric dependency pipeline. By jointly optimizing their behaviors toward a shared task objective, the reranker and generator are encouraged to cooperate, ensuring that document reranking and generation work in concert to improve the final response. Experimental results demonstrate good generalization and improved generation stability of CoRAG, even when the model is trained on only around 10K PopQA samples. Our model released in https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CoRAG-D63F

Related papers

• Enhancing Retrieval Augmentation via Adversarial Collaboration [50.117273835877334]
  We propose the Adrial Collaboration RAG (AC-RAG) framework to address "Retrieval Hallucinations"<n>AC-RAG employs two heterogeneous agents: a generalist Detector that identifies knowledge gaps, and a domain-specialized Resolver that provides precise solutions.<n>Experiments show that AC-RAG significantly improves retrieval accuracy and outperforms state-of-the-art RAG methods across various vertical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T08:54:20Z)
• SIRAG: Towards Stable and Interpretable RAG with A Process-Supervised Multi-Agent Framework [7.37561751991963]
  We propose a process-supervised multi-agent framework to bridge the gap between retriever and generator.<n>The proposed framework is modular and plug-and-play, requiring no modification to the retriever or generator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T09:09:28Z)
• Joint-GCG: Unified Gradient-Based Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [11.300387488829035]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) by retrieving relevant documents from external corpora before generating responses.<n>Existing poisoning attack strategies treat the retrieval and generation stages as disjointed, limiting their effectiveness.<n>Joint-GCG is the first framework to unify gradient-based attacks across both retriever and generator models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T15:12:06Z)
• Attributing Response to Context: A Jensen-Shannon Divergence Driven Mechanistic Study of Context Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [52.3707788779464]
  We introduce a novel Jensen-Shannon Divergence driven method to Attribute Response to Context (ARC-JSD)<n>ARC-JSD enables efficient and accurate identification of essential context sentences without additional fine-tuning, gradient-calculation or surrogate modelling.<n> Evaluations on a wide range of RAG benchmarks, such as TyDi QA, Hotpot QA, and Musique, using instruction-tuned LLMs in different scales demonstrate superior accuracy and significant computational efficiency improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:04:03Z)
• CDF-RAG: Causal Dynamic Feedback for Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation [3.8808821719659763]
  We introduce Causal Dynamic Feedback for Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CDF-RAG)<n>CDF-RAG iteratively refines queries, retrieves structured causal graphs, and enables multi-hop causal reasoning across interconnected knowledge sources.<n>We evaluate CDF-RAG on four diverse datasets, demonstrating its ability to improve response accuracy and causal correctness over existing RAG-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T01:15:13Z)
• CoRAG: Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Generation [26.748765050034876]
  CoRAG is a framework extendingtrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models to collaborative settings.<n>We show CoRAG consistently outperforms both parametric collaborative learning methods and locally trained RAG models in low-resource scenarios.<n>This introduces a novel consideration in collaborative RAG: the trade-off between leveraging a collectively enriched knowledge base and the potential risk of incorporating detrimental passages from other clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T16:40:43Z)
• Chain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation [91.02950964802454]
  This paper introduces an approach for training o1-like RAG models that retrieve and reason over relevant information step by step before generating the final answer.<n>Our proposed method, CoRAG, allows the model to dynamically reformulate the query based on the evolving state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T09:12:52Z)
• Controlling Risk of Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Counterfactual Prompting Framework [77.45983464131977]
  We focus on how likely it is that a RAG model's prediction is incorrect, resulting in uncontrollable risks in real-world applications.<n>Our research identifies two critical latent factors affecting RAG's confidence in its predictions.<n>We develop a counterfactual prompting framework that induces the models to alter these factors and analyzes the effect on their answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T14:52:14Z)
• DuetRAG: Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Generation [57.440772556318926]
  Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework, DuetRAG, proposed. bootstrapping philosophy is to simultaneously integrate the domain fintuning and RAG models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T09:48:28Z)
• CCA: Collaborative Competitive Agents for Image Editing [55.500493143796405]
  This paper presents a novel generative model, Collaborative Competitive Agents (CCA)<n>It leverages the capabilities of multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) based agents to execute complex tasks.<n>The paper's main contributions include the introduction of a multi-agent-based generative model with controllable intermediate steps and iterative optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T11:46:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.