Benchmarking Computational Pathology Foundation Models For Semantic Segmentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18747v1
• Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:00:46 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Computational Pathology Foundation Models For Semantic Segmentation
• Authors: Lavish Ramchandani, Aashay Tinaikar, Dev Kumar Das, Rohit Garg, Tijo Thomas,
• Abstract summary: Concatenating features from CONCH, PathDino and CellViT outperformed individual models across all the datasets by 7.95%.<n>We show that the vision language foundation model, CONCH performed the best across datasets when compared to vision-only foundation models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, foundation models such as CLIP, DINO,and CONCH have demonstrated remarkable domain generalization and unsupervised feature extraction capabilities across diverse imaging tasks. However, systematic and independent evaluations of these models for pixel-level semantic segmentation in histopathology remain scarce. In this study, we propose a robust benchmarking approach to asses 10 foundational models on four histopathological datasets covering both morphological tissue-region and cellular/nuclear segmentation tasks. Our method leverages attention maps of foundation models as pixel-wise features, which are then classified using a machine learning algorithm, XGBoost, enabling fast, interpretable, and model-agnostic evaluation without finetuning. We show that the vision language foundation model, CONCH performed the best across datasets when compared to vision-only foundation models, with PathDino as close second. Further analysis shows that models trained on distinct histopathology cohorts capture complementary morphological representations, and concatenating their features yields superior segmentation performance. Concatenating features from CONCH, PathDino and CellViT outperformed individual models across all the datasets by 7.95% (averaged across the datasets), suggesting that ensembles of foundation models can better generalize to diverse histopathological segmentation tasks.

Related papers

• Comparing Computational Pathology Foundation Models using Representational Similarity Analysis [0.6660458629649825]
  We systematically analyze the representational spaces of six CPath foundation models using techniques in computational neuroscience.<n>We find that UNI2 and Virchow2 have the most distinct representational structures, whereas Prov-Gigapath has the highest average similarity across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T23:01:13Z)
• Evaluating Vision Language Models (VLMs) for Radiology: A Comprehensive Analysis [4.803310914375717]
  This study evaluates three vision-language foundation models (RAD-DINO, CheXagent, and BiomedCLIP) on their ability to capture fine-grained imaging features for radiology tasks.<n>The models were assessed across classification, segmentation, and regression tasks for pneumothorax and cardiomegaly on chest radiographs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T17:20:34Z)
• PathSegDiff: Pathology Segmentation using Diffusion model representations [63.20694440934692]
  We propose PathSegDiff, a novel approach for histopathology image segmentation that leverages Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) as pre-trained featured extractors.<n>Our method utilizes a pathology-specific LDM, guided by a self-supervised encoder, to extract rich semantic information from H&E stained histopathology images.<n>Our experiments demonstrate significant improvements over traditional methods on the BCSS and GlaS datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T14:58:21Z)
• AI-Assisted Colonoscopy: Polyp Detection and Segmentation using Foundation Models [0.10037949839020764]
  In colonoscopy, 80% of the missed polyps could be detected with the help of Deep Learning models.<n>In the search for algorithms capable of addressing this challenge, foundation models emerge as promising candidates.<n>Their zero-shot or few-shot learning capabilities, facilitate generalization to new data or tasks without extensive fine-tuning.<n>A comprehensive evaluation of foundation models for polyp segmentation was conducted, assessing both detection and delimitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T14:20:53Z)
• Mind the Gap: Evaluating Patch Embeddings from General-Purpose and Histopathology Foundation Models for Cell Segmentation and Classification [0.20971479389679332]
  We implement an encoder-decoder architecture with a consistent decoder and various encoders.<n>We evaluate instance-level detection, segmentation accuracy, and cell-type classification.<n>This study provides insights into the comparative strengths and limitations of general-purpose vs. histopathology foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T16:47:00Z)
• GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models [56.63218531256961]
  We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T08:01:05Z)
• UniCell: Universal Cell Nucleus Classification via Prompt Learning [76.11864242047074]
  We propose a universal cell nucleus classification framework (UniCell) It employs a novel prompt learning mechanism to uniformly predict the corresponding categories of pathological images from different dataset domains. In particular, our framework adopts an end-to-end architecture for nuclei detection and classification, and utilizes flexible prediction heads for adapting various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:50:27Z)
• The Importance of Downstream Networks in Digital Pathology Foundation Models [1.689369173057502]
  We evaluate seven feature extractor models across three different datasets with 162 different aggregation model configurations. We find that the performance of many current feature extractor models is notably similar.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T16:54:25Z)
• Learning from Temporal Spatial Cubism for Cross-Dataset Skeleton-based Action Recognition [88.34182299496074]
  Action labels are only available on a source dataset, but unavailable on a target dataset in the training stage. We utilize a self-supervision scheme to reduce the domain shift between two skeleton-based action datasets. By segmenting and permuting temporal segments or human body parts, we design two self-supervised learning classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-17T07:05:39Z)
• Domain Adaptive Nuclei Instance Segmentation and Classification via Category-aware Feature Alignment and Pseudo-labelling [65.40672505658213]
  We propose a novel deep neural network, namely Category-Aware feature alignment and Pseudo-Labelling Network (CAPL-Net) for UDA nuclei instance segmentation and classification. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art UDA methods with a remarkable margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T07:05:06Z)
• A multi-stage machine learning model on diagnosis of esophageal manometry [50.591267188664666]
  The framework includes deep-learning models at the swallow-level stage and feature-based machine learning models at the study-level stage. This is the first artificial-intelligence-style model to automatically predict CC diagnosis of HRM study from raw multi-swallow data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T20:09:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.