When Pretty Isn't Useful: Investigating Why Modern Text-to-Image Models Fail as Reliable Training Data Generators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19946v2
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:29:33 GMT
• Title: When Pretty Isn't Useful: Investigating Why Modern Text-to-Image Models Fail as Reliable Training Data Generators
• Abstract summary: This work revisits the promise of synthetic data as a scalable substitute for real training sets.<n>We generate large-scale synthetic datasets using state-of-the-art T2I models released between 2022 and 2025.<n>Despite observable advances in visual fidelity and prompt adherence, classification accuracy on real test data consistently declines with newer T2I models as training data generators.
• Score: 8.125052877783043
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models produce visually stunning images and demonstrate excellent prompt following. But do they perform well as synthetic vision data generators? In this work, we revisit the promise of synthetic data as a scalable substitute for real training sets and uncover a surprising performance regression. We generate large-scale synthetic datasets using state-of-the-art T2I models released between 2022 and 2025, train standard classifiers solely on this synthetic data, and evaluate them on real test data. Despite observable advances in visual fidelity and prompt adherence, classification accuracy on real test data consistently declines with newer T2I models as training data generators. Our analysis reveals a hidden trend: These models collapse to a narrow, aesthetic-centric distribution that undermines diversity and label-image alignment. Overall, our findings challenge a growing assumption in vision research, namely that progress in generative realism implies progress in data realism. We thus highlight an urgent need to rethink the capabilities of modern T2I models as reliable training data generators.

Related papers

• A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops [55.07063067759609]
  High-quality data is essential for training large generative models, yet the vast reservoir of real data available online has become nearly depleted.<n>Models increasingly generate their own data for further training, forming Self-consuming Training Loops (STLs)<n>Some models degrade or even collapse, while others successfully avoid these failures, leaving a significant gap in theoretical understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T06:18:13Z)
• Will the Inclusion of Generated Data Amplify Bias Across Generations in Future Image Classification Models? [29.71939692883025]
  We investigate the effects of generated data on image classification tasks, with a specific focus on bias. Hundreds of experiments are conducted on Colorized MNIST, CIFAR-20/100, and Hard ImageNet datasets. Our findings contribute to the ongoing debate on the implications of synthetic data for fairness in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T05:07:06Z)
• Self-Consuming Generative Models with Curated Data Provably Optimize Human Preferences [20.629333587044012]
  We study the impact of data curation on iterated retraining of generative models. We prove that, if the data is curated according to a reward model, the expected reward of the iterative retraining procedure is maximized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T21:28:28Z)
• Is Synthetic Image Useful for Transfer Learning? An Investigation into Data Generation, Volume, and Utilization [62.157627519792946]
  We introduce a novel framework called bridged transfer, which initially employs synthetic images for fine-tuning a pre-trained model to improve its transferability. We propose dataset style inversion strategy to improve the stylistic alignment between synthetic and real images. Our proposed methods are evaluated across 10 different datasets and 5 distinct models, demonstrating consistent improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T22:25:05Z)
• Data-efficient Large Vision Models through Sequential Autoregression [58.26179273091461]
  We develop an efficient, autoregression-based vision model on a limited dataset. We demonstrate how this model achieves proficiency in a spectrum of visual tasks spanning both high-level and low-level semantic understanding. Our empirical evaluations underscore the model's agility in adapting to various tasks, heralding a significant reduction in the parameter footprint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T13:41:53Z)
• Learning Defect Prediction from Unrealistic Data [57.53586547895278]
  Pretrained models of code have become popular choices for code understanding and generation tasks. Such models tend to be large and require commensurate volumes of training data. It has become popular to train models with far larger but less realistic datasets, such as functions with artificially injected bugs. Models trained on such data tend to only perform well on similar data, while underperforming on real world programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T01:51:43Z)
• On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data [56.153542044045224]
  We study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T16:41:04Z)
• Leaving Reality to Imagination: Robust Classification via Generated Datasets [24.411444438920988]
  Recent research on robustness has revealed significant performance gaps between neural image classifiers trained on datasets similar to the test set. We study the question: How do generated datasets influence the natural robustness of image classifiers? We find that Imagenet classifiers trained on real data augmented with generated data achieve higher accuracy and effective robustness than standard training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-05T22:49:33Z)
• Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition? [69.42645602062024]
  We study whether and how synthetic images generated from state-of-the-art text-to-image generation models can be used for image recognition tasks. We showcase the powerfulness and shortcomings of synthetic data from existing generative models, and propose strategies for better applying synthetic data for recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:54:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.