Three Concrete Challenges and Two Hopes for the Safety of Unsupervised Elicitation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20400v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 22:39:40 GMT
• Title: Three Concrete Challenges and Two Hopes for the Safety of Unsupervised Elicitation
• Authors: Callum Canavan, Aditya Shrivastava, Allison Qi, Jonathan Michala, Fabien Roger,
• Abstract summary: We argue that datasets used for evaluations could cause overoptimistic evaluation results.<n>Unlike many real-world datasets, they often have no features with more salience than truthfulness.<n>We construct datasets that lack each of these properties to stress-test a range of standard unsupervised elicitation and easy-to-hard generalization techniques.
• Score: 2.5107780917370985
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: To steer language models towards truthful outputs on tasks which are beyond human capability, previous work has suggested training models on easy tasks to steer them on harder ones (easy-to-hard generalization), or using unsupervised training algorithms to steer models with no external labels at all (unsupervised elicitation). Although techniques from both paradigms have been shown to improve model accuracy on a wide variety of tasks, we argue that the datasets used for these evaluations could cause overoptimistic evaluation results. Unlike many real-world datasets, they often (1) have no features with more salience than truthfulness, (2) have balanced training sets, and (3) contain only data points to which the model can give a well-defined answer. We construct datasets that lack each of these properties to stress-test a range of standard unsupervised elicitation and easy-to-hard generalization techniques. We find that no technique reliably performs well on any of these challenges. We also study ensembling and combining easy-to-hard and unsupervised techniques, and find they only partially mitigate performance degradation due to these challenges. We believe that overcoming these challenges should be a priority for future work on unsupervised elicitation.

Related papers

• When to retrain a machine learning model [0.0]
  A significant challenge in maintaining real-world machine learning models is responding to the continuous and unpredictable evolution of data.<n>We propose an uncertainty-based method that makes decisions by continually forecasting the evolution of model performance evaluated with a bounded metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T20:55:56Z)
• Large (Vision) Language Models are Unsupervised In-Context Learners [14.930827851769276]
  We introduce a joint inference framework for fully unsupervised adaptation.<n>Unlike zero-shot inference, the joint inference makes predictions simultaneously for all inputs in a given task.<n>Our experiments demonstrate substantial improvements over the standard zero-shot approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T07:33:02Z)
• Guiding Through Complexity: What Makes Good Supervision for Hard Math Reasoning Tasks? [74.88417042125985]
  We investigate various data-driven strategies that offer supervision data at different quality levels upon tasks of varying complexity.<n>We find that even when the outcome error rate for hard task supervision is high, training on such data can outperform perfectly correct supervision of easier subtasks.<n>Our results also reveal that supplementing hard task supervision with the corresponding subtask supervision can yield notable performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T17:55:27Z)
• Weak-to-Strong Reasoning [33.20094938292376]
  We introduce a progressive learning framework that enables the strong model to autonomously refine its training data. Our method significantly enhances the reasoning capabilities of Llama2-70b using three separate weak models. This work paves the way for a more scalable and sophisticated strategy to enhance AI reasoning powers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T16:25:17Z)
• Easy-to-Hard Generalization: Scalable Alignment Beyond Human Supervision [98.97575836717931]
  Current AI alignment methodologies rely on human-provided demonstrations or judgments.<n>This raises a challenging research question: How can we keep improving the systems when their capabilities have surpassed the levels of humans?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:12:38Z)
• Fantastic Gains and Where to Find Them: On the Existence and Prospect of General Knowledge Transfer between Any Pretrained Model [74.62272538148245]
  We show that for arbitrary pairings of pretrained models, one model extracts significant data context unavailable in the other. We investigate if it is possible to transfer such "complementary" knowledge from one model to another without performance degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:46Z)
• Robust Monocular Depth Estimation under Challenging Conditions [81.57697198031975]
  State-of-the-art monocular depth estimation approaches are highly unreliable under challenging illumination and weather conditions. We tackle these safety-critical issues with md4all: a simple and effective solution that works reliably under both adverse and ideal conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T17:59:01Z)
• Exploring Strategies for Generalizable Commonsense Reasoning with Pre-trained Models [62.28551903638434]
  We measure the impact of three different adaptation methods on the generalization and accuracy of models. Experiments with two models show that fine-tuning performs best, by learning both the content and the structure of the task, but suffers from overfitting and limited generalization to novel answers. We observe that alternative adaptation methods like prefix-tuning have comparable accuracy, but generalize better to unseen answers and are more robust to adversarial splits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T03:13:06Z)
• Hierarchical Few-Shot Imitation with Skill Transition Models [66.81252581083199]
  Few-shot Imitation with Skill Transition Models (FIST) is an algorithm that extracts skills from offline data and utilizes them to generalize to unseen tasks. We show that FIST is capable of generalizing to new tasks and substantially outperforms prior baselines in navigation experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T15:56:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.