Are Multimodal Large Language Models Good Annotators for Image Tagging?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20972v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:53:16 GMT
• Title: Are Multimodal Large Language Models Good Annotators for Image Tagging?
• Authors: Ming-Kun Xie, Jia-Hao Xiao, Zhiqiang Kou, Zhongnian Li, Gang Niu, Masashi Sugiyama,
• Abstract summary: This paper aims to analyze the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations.<n>We propose TagLLM, a novel framework for image tagging, which aims to narrow the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations.
• Score: 62.01475514488922
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Image tagging, a fundamental vision task, traditionally relies on human-annotated datasets to train multi-label classifiers, which incurs significant labor and costs. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer promising potential to automate annotation, their capability to replace human annotators remains underexplored. This paper aims to analyze the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations and to propose an effective solution that enables MLLM-based annotation to replace manual labeling. Our analysis of MLLM annotations reveals that, under a conservative estimate, MLLMs can reduce annotation cost to as low as one-thousandth of the human cost, mainly accounting for GPU usage, which is nearly negligible compared to manual efforts. Their annotation quality reaches about 50\% to 80\% of human performance, while achieving over 90\% performance on downstream training tasks.Motivated by these findings, we propose TagLLM, a novel framework for image tagging, which aims to narrow the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations. TagLLM comprises two components: Candidates generation, which employs structured group-wise prompting to efficiently produce a compact candidate set that covers as many true labels as possible while reducing subsequent annotation workload; and label disambiguation, which interactively calibrates the semantic concept of categories in the prompts and effectively refines the candidate labels. Extensive experiments show that TagLLM substantially narrows the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations, especially in downstream training performance, where it closes about 60\% to 80\% of the difference.

Related papers

• Prompt Candidates, then Distill: A Teacher-Student Framework for LLM-driven Data Annotation [35.1208076670736]
  We propose a novel candidate annotation paradigm wherein large language models are encouraged to output all possible labels when incurring uncertainty.<n>To ensure unique labels are provided for downstream tasks, we develop a teacher-student framework CanDist that distills candidate annotations with a Small Language Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T11:42:37Z)
• Large Language Models as Span Annotators [5.488183187190419]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) can serve as flexible and cost-effective span annotation backbones.<n>We demonstrate that LLMs achieve inter-annotator agreement (IAA) comparable to human annotators at a fraction of a cost per output annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T17:04:51Z)
• Utility-Focused LLM Annotation for Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [96.18720164390699]
  This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for annotating document utility in training retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems.<n>Our results show that LLM-generated annotations enhance out-of-domain retrieval performance and improve RAG outcomes compared to models trained solely on human annotations or downstream QA metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T16:05:52Z)
• SegAgent: Exploring Pixel Understanding Capabilities in MLLMs by Imitating Human Annotator Trajectories [52.57696897619189]
  We introduce the Human-Like Mask Modeling Task (HLMAT), a new paradigm where MLLMs mimic human annotators using interactive segmentation tools.<n>HLMAT enables MLLMs to iteratively generate text-based click points, achieving high-quality masks without architectural changes or implicit tokens.<n>HLMAT provides a protocol for assessing fine-grained pixel understanding in MLLMs and introduces a vision-centric, multi-step decision-making task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:08:54Z)
• SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs. SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions. We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z)
• CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
  We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale. Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z)
• MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models [111.51612340032052]
  Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) relies on the powerful LLM to perform multimodal tasks.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive MLLM Evaluation benchmark MME.<n>It measures both perception and cognition abilities on a total of 14 subtasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T09:22:36Z)
• Generation-driven Contrastive Self-training for Zero-shot Text Classification with Instruction-following LLM [31.25193238045053]
  We introduce a novel method, namely GenCo, which leverages the strong generative power of large language models to assist in training a smaller language model. In our method, an LLM plays an important role in the self-training loop of a smaller model in two important ways. It helps crafting additional high-quality training pairs, by rewriting input texts conditioned on predicted labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T07:35:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.