Learning Complex Physical Regimes via Coverage-oriented Uncertainty Quantification: An application to the Critical Heat Flux

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21701v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:04:15 GMT
• Title: Learning Complex Physical Regimes via Coverage-oriented Uncertainty Quantification: An application to the Critical Heat Flux
• Authors: Michele Cazzola, Alberto Ghione, Lucia Sargentini, Julien Nespoulous, Riccardo Finotello,
• Abstract summary: Uncertainty quantification (UQ) should not be viewed as a safety assessment, but as a support to the learning task itself.<n>We focus on the Critical Heat Flux benchmark and dataset presented by the OECD/NEA Expert Group on Reactor Systems Multi-Physics.<n>We show that while post-hoc methods ensure statistical calibration, coverage-oriented learning effectively reshapes the model's representation to match the complex physical regimes.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A central challenge in scientific machine learning (ML) is the correct representation of physical systems governed by multi-regime behaviours. In these scenarios, standard data analysis techniques often fail to capture the nature of the data, as the system's response varies significantly across the state space due to its stochasticity and the different physical regimes. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) should thus not be viewed merely as a safety assessment, but as a support to the learning task itself, guiding the model to internalise the behaviour of the data. We address this by focusing on the Critical Heat Flux (CHF) benchmark and dataset presented by the OECD/NEA Expert Group on Reactor Systems Multi-Physics. This case study represents a test for scientific ML due to the non-linear dependence of CHF on the inputs and the existence of distinct microscopic physical regimes. These regimes exhibit diverse statistical profiles, a complexity that requires UQ techniques to internalise the data behaviour and ensure reliable predictions. In this work, we conduct a comparative analysis of UQ methodologies to determine their impact on physical representation. We contrast post-hoc methods, specifically conformal prediction, against end-to-end coverage-oriented pipelines, including (Bayesian) heteroscedastic regression and quality-driven losses. These approaches treat uncertainty not as a final metric, but as an active component of the optimisation process, modelling the prediction and its behaviour simultaneously. We show that while post-hoc methods ensure statistical calibration, coverage-oriented learning effectively reshapes the model's representation to match the complex physical regimes. The result is a model that delivers not only high predictive accuracy but also a physically consistent uncertainty estimation that adapts dynamically to the intrinsic variability of the CHF.

Related papers

• Towards a data-scale independent regulariser for robust sparse identification of non-linear dynamics [0.0]
  Data normalisation can severely distort the discovery of governing equations by magnitudebased sparse regression methods.<n>We introduce the Sequential Thresholding of Coefficient of Variation (STCV), a novel, computationally efficient sparse regression algorithm.<n>We show that STCV-based methods can successfully identify the correct, sparse physical laws even when other methods fail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T14:11:22Z)
• Equivariant Evidential Deep Learning for Interatomic Potentials [55.6997213490859]
  Uncertainty quantification is critical for assessing the reliability of machine learning interatomic potentials in molecular dynamics simulations.<n>Existing UQ approaches for MLIPs are often limited by high computational cost or suboptimal performance.<n>We propose textitEquivariant Evidential Deep Learning for Interatomic Potentials ($texte2$IP), a backbone-agnostic framework that models atomic forces and their uncertainty jointly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T02:00:25Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Regression using Proper Scoring Rules [76.24649098854219]
  We introduce a unified UQ framework for regression based on proper scoring rules, such as CRPS, logarithmic, squared error, and quadratic scores.<n>We derive closed-form expressions for the uncertainty measures under practical parametric assumptions and show how to estimate them using ensembles of models.<n>Our broad evaluation on synthetic and real-world regression datasets provides guidance for selecting reliable UQ measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T17:52:12Z)
• From Physics to Machine Learning and Back: Part II - Learning and Observational Bias in PHM [52.64097278841485]
  Review examines how incorporating learning and observational biases through physics-informed modeling and data strategies can guide models toward physically consistent and reliable predictions.<n>Fast adaptation methods including meta-learning and few-shot learning are reviewed alongside domain generalization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:15:43Z)
• Discovering Governing Equations in the Presence of Uncertainty [11.752763800308276]
  In this work, we theorize that accounting for system variability together with measurement noise is the key to consistently discover the governing equations underlying dynamical systems.<n>We show that SIP consistently identifies the correct equations by an average of 82% relative to the Sparse Identification Dynamics (SINDy) approach and its variant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T18:31:25Z)
• Plug-and-Play Physics-informed Learning using Uncertainty Quantified Port-Hamiltonian Models [5.1732651331429516]
  We introduce a Plug-and-Play Physics-In Machine Learning (PIML) framework to address this challenge.<n>Our method employs conformal prediction to identify outlier dynamics and switches from a nominal predictor to a physics-consistent model.<n>In this way, the proposed framework produces reliable physics-informed predictions even for the out-of-distribution scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T22:25:51Z)
• Conformal Prediction on Quantifying Uncertainty of Dynamic Systems [15.922642503804092]
  We introduce conformal prediction into the uncertainty assessment of dynamical systems.<n>This paper uses the conformal prediction method to assess uncertainties with benchmark operator learning methods.<n>We have also compared the Monte Carlo Dropout and Ensemble methods in the partial differential equations dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T10:45:02Z)
• FUSE: Fast Unified Simulation and Estimation for PDEs [11.991297011923004]
  We argue that solving both problems within the same framework can lead to consistent gains in accuracy and robustness. We present the capabilities of the proposed methodology for predicting continuous and discrete biomarkers in full-body haemodynamics simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T13:37:26Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Conformal Prediction Under Feedback Covariate Shift for Biomolecular Design [56.86533144730384]
  We introduce a method to quantify predictive uncertainty in settings where the training and test data are statistically dependent.<n>As a motivating use case, we demonstrate with several real data sets how our method quantifies uncertainty for the predicted fitness of designed proteins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T02:59:12Z)
• Stochastically forced ensemble dynamic mode decomposition for forecasting and analysis of near-periodic systems [65.44033635330604]
  We introduce a novel load forecasting method in which observed dynamics are modeled as a forced linear system. We show that its use of intrinsic linear dynamics offers a number of desirable properties in terms of interpretability and parsimony. Results are presented for a test case using load data from an electrical grid.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T20:25:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.