No Absolute Hierarchy of Quantum Complementarity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22792v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:29:00 GMT
• Title: No Absolute Hierarchy of Quantum Complementarity
• Authors: Kunika Agarwal, Sahil Gopalkrishna Naik, Ananya Chakraborty, Guruprasad Kar, Ram Krishna Patra, Snehasish Roy Chowdhury, Manik Banik,
• Abstract summary: Bohr's principle of complementarity prohibits simultaneous access to certain physical properties within a single experimental arrangement.<n>We show that this hierarchy ceases to be absolute in the multi-copy regime.<n>We uncover a configuration-dependent structure of complementarity, reveal a subtle role of entanglement in shaping the structure of measurement limitations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Bohr's principle of complementarity, prohibiting simultaneous access to certain physical properties within a single experimental arrangement, is considered to be a defining feature of quantum mechanics. It is commonly viewed as inducing an intrinsic hierarchy among incompatible observables: some sets of quantum properties are fundamentally more incompatible than others, as quantified by the maximal sharpness permitting their joint measurement. We show that this hierarchy ceases to be absolute in the multi-copy regime. Analyzing qubit spin observables, we prove a No-Comparison Theorem establishing that no global ordering of incompatible observable sets is preserved across all finite-copy configurations. In particular, two sets of observables can exhibit reversed complementarity ordering depending solely on whether the available resources are arranged as identical copies or as parallel-antiparallel pairs. Thus, the degree of quantum incompatibility is not an intrinsic property of observables alone but depends on the global configuration of the prepared quantum probes. Our results uncover a configuration-dependent structure of complementarity, reveal a subtle role of entanglement in shaping the structure of measurement limitations, and call for a reassessment of quantum information protocols under finite resources.

Related papers

• Quantum complementarity [41.99844472131922]
  Two properties of a system are considered complementary if they cannot be simultaneously well defined.<n>In quantum theory, this notion is equivalent to the incompatibility of operations -- that is, their inability to be performed simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T20:37:06Z)
• Compatibility of Quantum Measurements and the Emergence of Classical Objectivity [0.0]
  We consider the KDQ distributions describing arbitrary collections of measurements on disjoint components of some generic multipartite system. We show that the system dynamics ensures that these distributions are classical if and only if the Hamiltonian supports Quantum Darwinism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T19:01:30Z)
• Form of Contextuality Predicting Probabilistic Equivalence between Two Sets of Three Mutually Noncommuting Observables [0.0]
  We introduce a contextual quantum system comprising mutually complementary observables organized into two or more collections of pseudocontexts with the same probability sums of outcomes. These pseudocontexts constitute non-orthogonal bases within the Hilbert space, featuring a state-independent sum of probabilities. The measurement contextuality in this setup arises from the quantum realizations of the hypergraph, which adhere to a specific bound on the linear combination of probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T08:51:34Z)
• A Universal Quantum Certainty Relation for Arbitrary Number of Observables [0.0]
  We derive by lattice theory a universal quantum certainty relation for arbitrary $M$ observables in $N$-dimensional system.<n>It is found that one cannot prepare a quantum state with probability vectors of incompatible observables spreading out arbitrarily.<n>We also explore the connections between quantum uncertainty and quantum coherence, and obtain a complementary relation for the quantum coherence as well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-10T16:44:10Z)
• Step-by-step derivation of the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics (or from nondisturbing to quantum correlations by connecting incompatible observables) [0.0]
  This paper provides a step-by-step derivation of the quantum formalism. It helps us to understand why this formalism is as it is.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T19:27:24Z)
• Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information theories [68.8204255655161]
  We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory. We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z)
• Non-standard entanglement structure of local unitary self-dual models as a saturated situation of repeatability in general probabilistic theories [61.12008553173672]
  We show the existence of infinite structures of quantum composite system such that it is self-dual with local unitary symmetry. We also show the existence of a structure of quantum composite system such that non-orthogonal states in the structure are perfectly distinguishable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T23:37:58Z)
• Quantum coherence with incomplete set of pointers and corresponding wave-particle duality [0.0]
  Quantum coherence quantifies the amount of superposition in a quantum system. We develop the corresponding resource theory, identifying the free states and operations. We obtain a complementarity relation between the so-defined quantum coherence and the which-path information in an interferometric set-up.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-12T16:55:40Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
  This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators. Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.