EMPA: Evaluating Persona-Aligned Empathy as a Process
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00552v1
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 09:04:06 GMT
- Title: EMPA: Evaluating Persona-Aligned Empathy as a Process
- Abstract summary: EMPA is a process-oriented framework that evaluates persona-aligned support as sustained intervention rather than isolated replies.<n>It distills real interactions into controllable, psychologically grounded scenarios.<n>It scores trajectories in a latent psychological space by directional alignment, cumulative impact, and stability.
- Score: 2.6558732808569805
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Evaluating persona-aligned empathy in LLM-based dialogue agents remains challenging. User states are latent, feedback is sparse and difficult to verify in situ, and seemingly supportive turns can still accumulate into trajectories that drift from persona-specific needs. We introduce EMPA, a process-oriented framework that evaluates persona-aligned support as sustained intervention rather than isolated replies. EMPA distills real interactions into controllable, psychologically grounded scenarios, couples them with an open-ended multi-agent sandbox that exposes strategic adaptation and failure modes, and scores trajectories in a latent psychological space by directional alignment, cumulative impact, and stability. The resulting signals and metrics support reproducible comparison and optimization of long-horizon empathic behavior, and they extend to other agent settings shaped by latent dynamics and weak, hard-to-verify feedback.
Related papers
- How Affect Propagates among LLM Agents: Emergent Emotional Contagion in Crowd Simulation [0.0]
We study how affect propagates among agents that perceive and appraise one another in a multi-agent crowd simulation.<n>The architecture contains no hand-authored mechanism for directly transferring affective state between agents.<n>We show that the system produces emotional contagion dynamics with spatial, temporal, and personality-dependent structure in sparse, small crowds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-27T23:22:17Z) - Learning to Watch: Active Video Anomaly Understanding via Interleaved Policy Optimization [56.150184676745205]
Video anomaly understanding (VAU) relies on sparse, context-dependent cues.<n>We propose $Anomtext-$, a closed-loop framework that reconceptualizes video understanding as an active sequential decision-making process.<n>Inspired by human video-reviewing behavior, this framework unifies internal cognitive reasoning and strategic evidence acquisition into an interleaved policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T08:41:49Z) - HERO: Hindsight-Enhanced Reflection from Environment Observations for Agentic Self-Distillation [50.53459634301361]
HERO is a hindsight-enhanced self-distillation framework that uses next environment observations as locally aligned feedback.<n> HERO improves task success and reduces unnecessary turns over environment-feedback-only self-distillation and GRPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-10T01:35:34Z) - When Clients Stop Following: A Cognitive Conceptualization Diagram-driven Framework for Strategic Counseling [7.733715213738371]
Existing benchmarks rely heavily on highly cooperative simulated clients.<n>These clients often rapidly shift from resistance to compliance after only a few turns.<n>We propose a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-grounded resistance-aware framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T03:09:10Z) - The Illusion of Intervention: Your LLM-Simulated Experiment is an Observational Study [56.649987197786096]
Large language models (LLMs) show potential as simulators of human behavior.<n>LLMs can induce unintended shifts in latent user attributes, causing user drift.<n>We formalize the confounding or selection bias that can arise due to user drift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T06:09:41Z) - ALSO: Adversarial Online Strategy Optimization for Social Agents [63.84788516416339]
We propose textbfALSO (textbfAdrial ontextbfLine textbfStrategy textbfOptimization) as the first framework for online strategy optimization in social simulation.<n> ALSO formulates multi-turn interaction as an adversarial bandit problem, where combinations of static personas and dynamic strategy instructions are treated as arms.<n>Also introduces a lightweight neural surrogate to predict rewards from interaction histories, enabling sample-efficient exploration and continuous online adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T09:25:15Z) - Multimodal Hidden Markov Models for Persistent Emotional State Tracking [0.0]
Tracking an interpretable emotional arc of a conversation via the sentiment of individual utterances processed as a whole is central to both understanding and guiding communication.<n>We propose a lightweight framework that models conversational emotion as a sequence of latent emotional regimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T00:16:05Z) - Decoding the Human Factor: High Fidelity Behavioral Prediction for Strategic Foresight [0.0]
Large Behavioral Model is a behavioral foundation model fine-tuned to predict individual strategic choices with high fidelity.<n>We trained on a proprietary dataset linking stable dispositions, motivational states, and situational constraints to observed choices.<n>We find that while prompting-based baselines exhibit a complexity ceiling, LBM continues to benefit from increasingly dense trait profiles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T10:13:17Z) - PsychePass: Calibrating LLM Therapeutic Competence via Trajectory-Anchored Tournaments [41.84590571482057]
We argue that current evaluation paradigms suffer from an unanchored defect, leading to two forms of instability.<n>We introduce Ps, a unified framework that calibrates the therapeutic competence of LLMs via trajectory-anchored tournaments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-28T07:48:39Z) - Structured Personality Control and Adaptation for LLM Agents [11.050618253938126]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly shaping human-computer interaction (HCI)<n>We present a framework that models LLM personality via Jungian psychological types.<n>This design allows the agent to maintain nuanced traits while dynamically adjusting to interaction demands.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T03:15:24Z) - PTCBENCH: Benchmarking Contextual Stability of Personality Traits in LLM Systems [30.449659477704543]
We introduce PTCBENCH, a benchmark designed to quantify the consistency of large language models (LLMs) personalities under controlled situational contexts.<n> PTCBENCH subjects models to 12 distinct external conditions spanning diverse location contexts and life events, and rigorously assesses the personality using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.<n>Our study on 39,240 personality trait records reveals that certain external scenarios can trigger significant personality changes of LLMs, and even alter their reasoning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T18:15:50Z) - LLM-MC-Affect: LLM-Based Monte Carlo Modeling of Affective Trajectories and Latent Ambiguity for Interpersonal Dynamic Insight [1.1119672724275114]
Emotional coordination is a core property of human interaction that shapes how meaning is constructed in real time.<n>We introduce a probabilistic framework that characterizes emotion not as a static label, but as a continuous latent probability distribution.<n>This work establishes a scalable and deployable pathway for understanding interpersonal dynamics, offering a generalizable solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T06:50:41Z) - Grounded Test-Time Adaptation for LLM Agents [75.62784644919803]
Large language model (LLM)-based agents struggle to generalize to novel and complex environments.<n>We propose two strategies for adapting LLM agents by leveraging environment-specific information available during deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-06T22:24:35Z) - Consistently Simulating Human Personas with Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning [52.07170679746533]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human users in interactive settings such as therapy, education, and social role-play.<n>We introduce a unified framework for evaluating and improving persona consistency in LLM-generated dialogue.<n>We define three automatic metrics: prompt-to-line consistency, line-to-line consistency, and Q&A consistency, that capture different types of persona drift and validate each against human annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T19:40:41Z) - Alignment Tipping Process: How Self-Evolution Pushes LLM Agents Off the Rails [103.05296856071931]
We identify the Alignment Tipping Process (ATP), a critical post-deployment risk unique to self-evolving Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>ATP arises when continual interaction drives agents to abandon alignment constraints established during training in favor of reinforced, self-interested strategies.<n>Our experiments show that alignment benefits erode rapidly under self-evolution, with initially aligned models converging toward unaligned states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T14:48:39Z) - Active Test-time Vision-Language Navigation [60.69722522420299]
ATENA is a test-time active learning framework that enables a practical human-robot interaction via episodic feedback on uncertain navigation outcomes.<n>In particular, ATENA learns to increase certainty in successful episodes and decrease it in failed ones, improving uncertainty calibration.<n>In addition, we propose a self-active learning strategy that enables an agent to evaluate its navigation outcomes based on confident predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-07T02:24:44Z) - Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on Conversational Recommender Systems: A Simulation with Large Language Models [70.180385882195]
This paper introduces a personality-aware user simulation for Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs)<n>The user agent induces customizable personality traits and preferences, while the system agent possesses the persuasion capability to simulate realistic interaction in CRSs.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art LLMs can effectively generate diverse user responses aligned with specified personality traits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-09T13:21:17Z) - AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven
Agents [65.16893197330589]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios.
However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored.
We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.