MO-MIX: Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making With Deep Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00730v1
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 16:25:22 GMT
- Title: MO-MIX: Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making With Deep Reinforcement Learning
- Authors: Tianmeng Hu, Biao Luo, Chunhua Yang, Tingwen Huang,
- Abstract summary: Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has been applied extensively to solve complex decision-making problems.<n>Existing approaches are limited to separate fields and can only handle multi-agent decision-making with a single objective.<n>We propose MO-mix to solve the multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning (MOMARL) problem.
- Score: 68.91090643731987
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has been applied extensively to solve complex decision-making problems. In many real-world scenarios, tasks often have several conflicting objectives and may require multiple agents to cooperate, which are the multi-objective multi-agent decision-making problems. However, only few works have been conducted on this intersection. Existing approaches are limited to separate fields and can only handle multi-agent decision-making with a single objective, or multi-objective decision-making with a single agent. In this paper, we propose MO-MIX to solve the multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning (MOMARL) problem. Our approach is based on the centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE) framework. A weight vector representing preference over the objectives is fed into the decentralized agent network as a condition for local action-value function estimation, while a mixing network with parallel architecture is used to estimate the joint action-value function. In addition, an exploration guide approach is applied to improve the uniformity of the final non-dominated solutions. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively solve the multi-objective multi-agent cooperative decision-making problem and generate an approximation of the Pareto set. Our approach not only significantly outperforms the baseline method in all four kinds of evaluation metrics, but also requires less computational cost.
Related papers
- An Efficient Approach for Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning Problems [0.8287206589886881]
We propose a central framework for learning a policy that models the simultaneous behavior of multiple agents.<n>Our approach addresses the coordination problem via a sequential abstraction, which overcomes the scalability problems typical to centralized methods.<n>Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach successfully coordinates agents across a variety of Multi-Agent Learning environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T09:03:35Z) - Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models.<n>Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining.<n>We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z) - Learning Emergence of Interaction Patterns across Independent RL Agents in Multi-Agent Environments [3.0284592792243794]
Bottom Up Network (BUN) treats the collective of multi-agents as a unified entity.
Our empirical evaluations across a variety of cooperative multi-agent scenarios, including tasks such as cooperative navigation and traffic control, consistently demonstrate BUN's superiority over baseline methods with substantially reduced computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T14:25:02Z) - UCB-driven Utility Function Search for Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning [51.00436121587591]
In Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) agents are tasked with optimising decision-making behaviours.<n>We focus on the case of linear utility functions parametrised by weight vectors w.<n>We introduce a method based on Upper Confidence Bound to efficiently search for the most promising weight vectors during different stages of the learning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T09:34:42Z) - Many-Objective Multi-Solution Transport [36.07360460509921]
Many-objective multi-solution Transport (MosT) is a framework that finds multiple diverse solutions in the Pareto front of many objectives.
MosT formulates the problem as a bi-level optimization of weighted objectives for each solution, where the weights are defined by an optimal transport between the objectives and solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T23:03:12Z) - A Scale-Independent Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with
Convergence Analysis [0.6091702876917281]
Many sequential decision-making problems need optimization of different objectives which possibly conflict with each other.
We develop a single-agent scale-independent multi-objective reinforcement learning on the basis of the Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C) algorithm.
A convergence analysis is then done for the devised multi-objective algorithm providing a convergence-in-mean guarantee.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T16:38:55Z) - Efficient Model-Based Multi-Agent Mean-Field Reinforcement Learning [89.31889875864599]
We propose an efficient model-based reinforcement learning algorithm for learning in multi-agent systems.
Our main theoretical contributions are the first general regret bounds for model-based reinforcement learning for MFC.
We provide a practical parametrization of the core optimization problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-08T18:01:02Z) - F2A2: Flexible Fully-decentralized Approximate Actor-critic for
Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [110.35516334788687]
Decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms are sometimes unpractical in complicated applications.
We propose a flexible fully decentralized actor-critic MARL framework, which can handle large-scale general cooperative multi-agent setting.
Our framework can achieve scalability and stability for large-scale environment and reduce information transmission.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T14:56:29Z) - FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradients [103.30380537282517]
We propose FACtored Multi-Agent Centralised policy gradients (FACMAC)
It is a new method for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning in both discrete and continuous action spaces.
We evaluate FACMAC on variants of the multi-agent particle environments, a novel multi-agent MuJoCo benchmark, and a challenging set of StarCraft II micromanagement tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-14T21:29:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.