DUCX: Decomposing Unfairness in Tool-Using Chest X-ray Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00777v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 18:46:45 GMT
• Title: DUCX: Decomposing Unfairness in Tool-Using Chest X-ray Agents
• Abstract summary: Tool-using medical agents can improve chest X-ray question answering by orchestrating specialized vision and language modules.<n>We present ours (Decomposing Unfairness in Chest X-ray agents), a systematic audit of chest X-ray agents instantiated with MedRAX.
• Score: 35.69412546569078
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Tool-using medical agents can improve chest X-ray question answering by orchestrating specialized vision and language modules, but this added pipeline complexity also creates new pathways for demographic bias beyond standalone models. We present ours (Decomposing Unfairness in Chest X-ray agents), a systematic audit of chest X-ray agents instantiated with MedRAX. To localize where disparities arise, we introduce a stage-wise fairness decomposition that separates end-to-end bias from three agent-specific sources: tool exposure bias (utility gaps conditioned on tool presence), tool transition bias (subgroup differences in tool-routing patterns), and model reasoning bias (subgroup differences in synthesis behaviors). Extensive experiments on tool-used based agentic frameworks across five driver backbones reveal that (i) demographic gaps persist in end-to-end performance, with equalized odds up to 20.79%, and the lowest fairness-utility tradeoff down to 28.65%, and (ii) intermediate behaviors, tool usage, transition patterns, and reasoning traces exhibit distinct subgroup disparities that are not predictable from end-to-end evaluation alone (e.g., conditioned on segmentation-tool availability, the subgroup utility gap reaches as high as 50%). Our findings underscore the need for process-level fairness auditing and debiasing to ensure the equitable deployment of clinical agentic systems. Code is available here: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DUCK-E5FE/README.md

Related papers

• A Multi-Agent Audit Framework for High-Stakes Reasoning: Evaluation and Interpretability in Clinical Mental Health Screening [0.8758828205574085]
  We propose a Multi-Agent Audit Framework that simulates a collaborative, multi-step verification process.<n>We empirically validate this architecture in the sensitive domain of clinical mental health screening.<n>Our framework decomposes the reasoning process into a Perception Agent, Knowledge Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), Chain-of-Thought (CoT) clinical inference, and a critical Audit verification stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T05:51:03Z)
• AgentFairBench: Do LLM Agents Discriminate When They Act? [2.3004655342211078]
  AgentFairBench is a cheap, reproducible, multi-domain benchmark for demographic disparity in the actions of LLM agents.<n>It spans three regulator-anchored domains: hiring, lending, and medical triage.<n>A NumPy-only harness computes counterfactual flip rate, mean absolute score difference (MASD), action-rate disparity, and tool-invocation disparity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T13:50:26Z)
• UltrasoundAgents: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Evidence-Chain Reasoning for Breast Ultrasound Diagnosis [14.027321451902734]
  We propose a hierarchical multi-agent framework, termed UltrasoundAgents.<n>A main agent localizes the lesion in the full image and triggers a crop-and-zoom operation.<n>A sub-agent analyzes the local view and predicts four clinically relevant attributes, namely echogenicity pattern, calcification, boundary type, and edge morphology.<n>The main agent then integrates these structured attributes to perform evidence-based reasoning and output the BI-RADS category and the malignancy prediction, while producing reviewable intermediate evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T15:03:52Z)
• Developing Fairness-Aware Task Decomposition to Improve Equity in Post-Spinal Fusion Complication Prediction [3.860970992977915]
  We propose a fairness-aware multitask learning framework for postoperative complication prediction.<n> FAIR-MTL employs a data-driven subgroup inference mechanism.<n>It achieves an AUC of 0.86 and an accuracy of 75%, outperforming single-task baselines while substantially reducing bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T19:06:07Z)
• CXRAgent: Director-Orchestrated Multi-Stage Reasoning for Chest X-Ray Interpretation [62.0150409256153]
  We propose CXRAgent, a director-orchestrated, multi-stage agent for CXR interpretation.<n>The agent strategically orchestrates a set of CXR-analysis tools, with outputs normalized and verified by the Evidence-driven Validator.<n>Experiments on various CXR interpretation tasks show that CXRAgent delivers strong performance, providing visual evidence and generalizes well to clinical tasks of different complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T10:31:30Z)
• From Detection to Mitigation: Addressing Bias in Deep Learning Models for Chest X-Ray Diagnosis [3.9236980712240217]
  We present a comprehensive bias detection and mitigation framework targeting sex, age, and race-based disparities when performing diagnostic tasks with chest X-rays.<n>We show that replacing the final layer of CNN with an eXtreme Gradient Boosting classifier improves the fairness of the subgroup while maintaining or improving the overall predictive performance.<n>We further compare this lightweight adapter training method with traditional full-model training bias mitigation techniques, including adversarial training, reweighting, data augmentation, and active learning, and find that our approach offers competitive or superior bias reduction at a fraction of the computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T22:20:08Z)
• Using Backbone Foundation Model for Evaluating Fairness in Chest Radiography Without Demographic Data [2.7436483977171333]
  This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of using the backbone of Foundation Models as an embedding extractor. We propose utilizing these groups in different stages of bias mitigation, including pre-processing, in-processing, and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T20:35:38Z)
• (Predictable) Performance Bias in Unsupervised Anomaly Detection [3.826262429926079]
  Unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) models promise to aid in the crucial first step of disease detection. Our study quantified the disparate performance of UAD models against certain demographic subgroups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T14:57:43Z)
• The Role of Subgroup Separability in Group-Fair Medical Image Classification [18.29079361470428]
  We find a relationship between subgroup separability, subgroup disparities, and performance degradation when models are trained on data with systematic bias such as underdiagnosis. Our findings shed new light on the question of how models become biased, providing important insights for the development of fair medical imaging AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T06:06:47Z)
• Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentation using Diffusion Models [60.378180265885945]
  We introduce a single diffusion model-based approach that produces multiple plausible outputs by learning a distribution over group insights. Our proposed model generates a distribution of segmentation masks by leveraging the inherent sampling process of diffusion. Comprehensive results show that our proposed approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art ambiguous segmentation networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:58:22Z)
• Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective [51.70661197256033]
  We propose ARCO, a semi-supervised contrastive learning framework with stratified group theory for medical image segmentation. We first propose building ARCO through the concept of variance-reduced estimation and show that certain variance-reduction techniques are particularly beneficial in pixel/voxel-level segmentation tasks. We experimentally validate our approaches on eight benchmarks, i.e., five 2D/3D medical and three semantic segmentation datasets, with different label settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T13:50:25Z)
• Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift [94.31956965507085]
  We define and analyze robust and spurious representations using the information-theoretic concept of minimal sufficient statistics. We prove that even when there is only bias of the input distribution, models can still pick up spurious features from their training data. Inspired by our analysis, we demonstrate that group DRO can fail when groups do not directly account for various spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T05:39:09Z)
• Chest x-ray automated triage: a semiologic approach designed for clinical implementation, exploiting different types of labels through a combination of four Deep Learning architectures [83.48996461770017]
  This work presents a Deep Learning method based on the late fusion of different convolutional architectures. We built four training datasets combining images from public chest x-ray datasets and our institutional archive. We trained four different Deep Learning architectures and combined their outputs with a late fusion strategy, obtaining a unified tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-23T14:38:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.