Conformal Prediction for Risk-Controlled Medical Entity Extraction Across Clinical Domains
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00924v2
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 06:54:54 GMT
- Title: Conformal Prediction for Risk-Controlled Medical Entity Extraction Across Clinical Domains
- Abstract summary: We present a conformal prediction framework that provides finite-sample coverage guarantees for medical entity extraction.<n>First, we extract structured entities from 1,000 FDA drug labels across eight sections using GPT-4.1, verified via FactScore-based atomic statement evaluation.<n>Second, we extract radiological entities from MIMIC-CXR reports using the RadGraph schema with GPT-4.1 and Llama-4-Maverick, evaluated against physician annotations.
- Score: 2.744879848686032
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for medical entity extraction, yet their confidence scores are often miscalibrated, limiting safe deployment in clinical settings. We present a conformal prediction framework that provides finite-sample coverage guarantees for LLM-based extraction across two clinical domains. First, we extract structured entities from 1,000 FDA drug labels across eight sections using GPT-4.1, verified via FactScore-based atomic statement evaluation (97.7\% accuracy over 128,906 entities). Second, we extract radiological entities from MIMIC-CXR reports using the RadGraph schema with GPT-4.1 and Llama-4-Maverick, evaluated against physician annotations (entity F1: 0.81 to 0.84). Our central finding is that miscalibration direction reverses across domains: on well-structured FDA labels, models are underconfident, requiring modest conformal thresholds ($τ\approx 0.06$), while on free-text radiology reports, models are overconfident, demanding strict thresholds ($τ$ up to 0.99). Despite this heterogeneity, conformal prediction achieves target coverage ($\geq 90\%$) in both settings with manageable rejection rates (9--13\%). These results demonstrate that calibration is not a global model property but depends on document structure, extraction category, and model architecture, motivating domain-specific conformal calibration for safe clinical deployment.
Related papers
- A Domain-Structured Ensemble Framework for Perioperative Outcome Prediction Using Electronic Health Record Data [0.0]
Perioperative risk prediction models are often limited by narrow surgical populations, incomplete data, and limited interpretability.<n>We present a domain-structured ensemble framework for outcome prediction using routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data.<n>We demonstrate the framework using postoperative delirium in a case-control sample of 5,386 surgical encounters from a statewide health information exchange.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-09T21:15:12Z) - When Calibration Fails the Vulnerable Hospital: Federated Conformal Risk Control via Risk-Curve Shrinkage [0.0]
Conformal risk control (CRC) provides distribution-free guarantees on segmentation quality.<n>In federated deployments, the standard approach pools calibration scores across sites into a single threshold.<n>We show that this naive pooled CRC protects the average hospital but violates coverage at 40% of individual institutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-18T11:39:44Z) - Confidence is Not Reliability: Rethinking MC Dropout in Brain Tumour Segmentation [2.104759809264928]
A segmentation model that fails silently on treatment-critical sub-regions represents a patient safety risk.<n>We ask whether voxel-level uncertainty estimation via Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout can reliably identify segmentation errors.<n>We evaluate a high-performance pretrained SegResNet and a locally trained UNet with residual units.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T17:24:41Z) - Beyond Scalar Scores: Exploring LLM-based Metrics for Clinical Significance Evaluation in Radiology Reports [49.5225801722164]
Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar.<n>We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T08:10:30Z) - A Multi-Stage Validation Framework for Trustworthy Large-scale Clinical Information Extraction using Large Language Models [1.9110728489340625]
Large language models (LLMs) show promise for extracting clinically meaningful information from unstructured health records.<n>We propose a multi-stage validation framework for LLM-based clinical information extraction.<n>We applied this framework to extraction of substance use disorder diagnoses across 11 substance categories from 919,783 clinical notes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T16:23:52Z) - Suppressing Prior-Comparison Hallucinations in Radiology Report Generation via Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering [94.37535002230504]
We develop a training-free, inference-time control framework termed Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering.<n>Our approach constructs a semantic-free intervention vector via large language model (LLM)-driven semantic decomposition.<n>We show that our approach significantly reduces the probability of historical hallucinations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T04:49:01Z) - Automated Rubrics for Reliable Evaluation of Medical Dialogue Systems [19.880569341968023]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for clinical decision support, where hallucinations and unsafe suggestions may pose direct risks to patient safety.<n>We propose a retrieval-augmented multi-agent framework designed to automate the generation of instance-specific evaluation rubrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-21T16:40:41Z) - CTest-Metric: A Unified Framework to Assess Clinical Validity of Metrics for CT Report Generation [8.08950963137043]
We present CTest-Metric, a first unified metric assessment framework with three modules determining the clinical feasibility of metrics for CT RRG.<n>The modules test: (i) Writing Style Generalizability (WSG) via LLM-based rephrasing; (ii) Synthetic Error Injection (SEI) at graded severities; and (iii) Metrics-vs-Expert correlation (MvE) using clinician ratings on 175 "disagreement" cases.<n>Eight widely used metrics (BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, BERTScore-F1, F1-RadGraph, Ra
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T18:09:19Z) - Conditional Coverage Diagnostics for Conformal Prediction [47.93989136542648]
We show that conditional coverage estimation can be a classification problem.<n>We call the resulting family of metrics excess risk of the target coverage (ERT)<n>We release an open-source package for ERT as well as previous conditional coverage metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-12T18:47:39Z) - COPE: Chain-Of-Thought Prediction Engine for Open-Source Large Language Model Based Stroke Outcome Prediction from Clinical Notes [23.044580867637105]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Outcome Prediction Engine (COPE) is a reasoning-enhanced large language model framework for predicting outcomes from unstructured clinical notes.<n>This study included 464 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with discharge summaries and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores.<n>COPE achieved an MAE of 1.01 ( 95% CI 0.92-1.11), +/-1 accuracy of 74.4% (69.9, 78.8%), and exact accuracy of 32.8% (28.0, 37.6%).
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-02T07:44:20Z) - Conformal Lesion Segmentation for 3D Medical Images [82.92159832699583]
We propose a risk-constrained framework that calibrates data-driven thresholds via conformalization to ensure the test-time FNR remains below a target tolerance.<n>We validate the statistical soundness and predictive performance of CLS on six 3D-LS datasets across five backbone models, and conclude with actionable insights for deploying risk-aware segmentation in clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-19T08:21:00Z) - Large Language Model-Based Uncertainty-Adjusted Label Extraction for Artificial Intelligence Model Development in Upper Extremity Radiography [1.1994929325702173]
GPT-4o filled out structured templates by indicating imaging findings as present ("true"), absent ("false"), or "uncertain"<n>To assess the impact of label uncertainty, "uncertain" labels of the training and validation sets were automatically reassigned to "true" (inclusive) or "false"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T08:19:18Z) - A Modular Approach for Clinical SLMs Driven by Synthetic Data with Pre-Instruction Tuning, Model Merging, and Clinical-Tasks Alignment [46.776978552161395]
Small language models (SLMs) offer a cost-effective alternative to large language models such as GPT-4.<n>SLMs offer a cost-effective alternative, but their limited capacity requires biomedical domain adaptation.<n>We propose a novel framework for adapting SLMs into high-performing clinical models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-15T21:40:21Z) - Statistical Management of the False Discovery Rate in Medical Instance Segmentation Based on Conformal Risk Control [2.4578723416255754]
Instance segmentation plays a pivotal role in medical image analysis by enabling precise localization and delineation of lesions, tumors, and anatomical structures.<n>Deep learning models such as Mask R-CNN and BlendMask have achieved remarkable progress, but their application in high-risk medical scenarios remains constrained by confidence calibration issues.<n>We propose a robust quality control framework based on conformal prediction theory to address this challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-06T13:31:19Z) - CRTRE: Causal Rule Generation with Target Trial Emulation Framework [47.2836994469923]
We introduce a novel method called causal rule generation with target trial emulation framework (CRTRE)
CRTRE applies randomize trial design principles to estimate the causal effect of association rules.
We then incorporate such association rules for the downstream applications such as prediction of disease onsets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-10T02:40:06Z) - Learning to diagnose cirrhosis from radiological and histological labels
with joint self and weakly-supervised pretraining strategies [62.840338941861134]
We propose to leverage transfer learning from large datasets annotated by radiologists, to predict the histological score available on a small annex dataset.
We compare different pretraining methods, namely weakly-supervised and self-supervised ones, to improve the prediction of the cirrhosis.
This method outperforms the baseline classification of the METAVIR score, reaching an AUC of 0.84 and a balanced accuracy of 0.75.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T17:06:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.